Lol look at this totalitarian gulag. Human rights peaceful p

>>70290571
Welcome to Trump's America

>>70290571
>>70290654
http://www.cnbc.com/2017/01/20/mac-attack-trump-protesters-smash-window-at-mcdonalds-bank-of-america-other-businesses-ahead-of-presidential-swearing-in-dc.html

WTF I HATE TRUMP NOW

#FUCKTHELECTEDPRESIDENT

>Americans are so fat because fat helps them to absorb bullets when they get shooted.
That's smart.

File: Screenshot_2017-01-23_06-20-39.png (344KB, 503x548px) Image search: [Google]

344KB, 503x548px

wtf hate trump now

File: Screenshot_2017-01-23_06-21-01.png (303KB, 503x690px) Image search: [Google]

303KB, 503x690px

wtf, fuck trump #NOTMYPRESIDENT

File: Screenshot_2017-01-23_06-21-47.png (1MB, 1247x805px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1247x805px

>>70290571
>>70290654
why did the peaceful protesters do this?


why the fuck do the racist nazi police keep arresting peaceful protesters who just want to destroy things?

>>70290785
t. professional ukrainian.

File: Screenshot_2017-01-23_06-22-37.png (762KB, 624x899px) Image search: [Google]

762KB, 624x899px

>>70290571
>>70290654
WTF FUCK TRUMP NOW

WELCOME TO TRUMP'S AMERICA

#FREEMYFELLOWCRIMINALS
#FUCKTHEPIGS
#WEDINDUNUFFIN

File: Screenshot_2017-01-23_06-25-26.png (530KB, 508x801px) Image search: [Google]

530KB, 508x801px

>>70290809
#SMAASSSHFASCISM

NON-TOLERANCE IS NOT TOLERATED HERE

>before the election
>Lol lefties are total pussies who just cry on Tumblr, fucking numales have no balls to do anything IRL

>after the election
>OMG IM SO TRIGGERED THEY ACTUALLY LEFT THEIR BASEMENTS

File: Screenshot_2017-01-23_06-26-30.png (754KB, 639x867px) Image search: [Google]

754KB, 639x867px

wtf? can't peacefully protest in ameriKKKa anymore?

fuck trump, fuck WHITE PEOPLE

Good, good, now have a civil war.

>>70290852
>Destroying property in protest of a democratically elected president

Really makes me think...

>>70290785
t.thinks all protesters are the same person

so why arent these commies on the noose yet? i thought usa was the world leading commie slayer

>>70290856
>Trusting Igor Babic
Kremlin bot at his best.

>>70290892
No one said they were. But how can you claim that it's a peaceful protest when it quite clearly wasn't?

What's being protested anyways, a president getting elected by the people?

>>70290871
>democratically
Top kek

>>70290871
And? Rightists have been provoking leftists for years, constantly saying they don't have the balls to do anything.

Our riot police is a lot worse/better desu. They just starts beating everyone.

>>70290867
I heard California has the self identification right to arrange the referendum.

>>70290918
The Women's March had zero arrests. It was the inaugural protests that had all the violence. The women's march was far bigger than the inaugural protests.

People are protesting Trump's promises about what he's going to do and what he's done so far.

>>70290942
Hихyя нe бyдeт

>>70290925
Oh nice, really did a lot.

Broke some store windows and set trashcans on fire.

Meanwhile who won?

>>70290958
>The Women's March had zero arrests

what was the women's march for?

I saw some coverage of that in Canada, I'm confused what rights women are lacking here

>>70290867
It's overdue. The union must be dismantled.

>>70291000
A man who bragged about sexual assault is now in charge of the branch of government responsible for enforcing the law against sexual assaulters. Wouldn't you be afraid if you were a woman?

>>70290942
NACHALOS'

>>70291039
No.

>>70290971
The right won the presidency. The left won popular culture and public opinion.

i didnt know dc had so many white people

>>70291073
They came from out of state.

File: ca565780dd83d48d292141fd5dd77640.jpg (119KB, 960x640px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 960x640px

They beat innocent students just like Yanukovich regime.
American maidan when? Americans should self-organize.

>>70291039
explain how he bragged about sexual assault. quote: "And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.

Bush: Whatever you want.

Trump: Grab ’em by the pussy. You can do anything."

He said they let him do it, so it's not really assault.

>>70291060
Well you're not a woman. Most women don't think like you.

>>70291039
:^)

>>70291039
Why was there a women's march in Canada?

I didn't know that Trump or his representatives had any influence on Canadian laws

>>70291089
Your way of thinking is WHY women are afraid of Trump and his supporters. They don't want men to think they can just sexually assault women because they have enough status. Trump thinking they let him do it is not proof that women actually let men do that.

>>70291147
I think you're kind of taking what trump said out of context

>>70291105
Because of the US's enormous cultural hegemony.

>>70291164
In what context is what he said not an attempt to justify sexual assault?

>>70291089
I just kill niggers,they let me do it hehe
No need to be afraid niggers

>>70290571
It's amazing how they act like they're not doing anything and are just victims.
Fucking retards.

why do i even come to this board?

>>70291212
I dunno go back to you safe space babby leaf

>>70291275
Okay i'll go back to rebbit

File: 1482337631313.jpg (65KB, 982x789px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 982x789px

>>70291291
Dumb rabbitposter

>>70291039
If someone lets you grap them by the pussy then it isn't sexual assault.

Is confusion about this why you're still a virgin?

>>70291147
>Your way of thinking is WHY women are afraid of Trump and his supporters.
Speak for yourself you tranny faggot.

>>70291413
I'm not a virgin. And you're only considering that ONLY Trump said they let him do it. We don't know if the women *actually* let him do it.

>>70291440
This is why the rest of the nation hates you so much.

>>70291469
not enough of the nation hated him to not get him elected tbqh

>>70291093
This is our Minister of Agriculture http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/news/features/soya-king-wins-chainsaw/

Alexandre de Moraes is our Minister of Justice and seems to have some shady connections with PCC while he was the Secretary of Public Safety of SP

A guy doing standard "pedreiragem", men bragging or whatever is what you call that in English is literally nothing, Trump has no means nor will to change the laws about sexual assaults.

>>70291469
But we do know no women came out saying they didn't let him do it.

So obviously the logical thing to do is just assume rape in all circumstances.

>>70290785
Isn't it in their constitution that citizens have the right to clap violently in public? Looks like they are merely exercising their freedom and liberty.

>>70291500
He got elected by a minority. And most of the people who voted for him hate him, they just hated Hillary more.

>>70291538
In the USA, the executive branch's duty is to enforce the law. Yes, Trump can pardon people for sexual assault.

>>70290919
indeed
democracy is democracy only if your candidate wins

>>70291654
Well that sucks but I'm afraid that we're just going to have to see how the next 8 years pan out.

No point protesting and destroying property of businesses' that had nothing to do with it.

>>70291683
Why are you assuming he'll get re elected?

>>70291703
Oh that was a typo.

I'm sure Bernie Sanders will win next time and make everything free

>>70291738
Why do you assume I support Bernie?

>>70291775
Why do you assume I assume you support bernie?

*I* support Bernie, and I think he still has a chance

>>70291787
Stop shitposting.

>>70291039
Is he going to make sexual assaults legal?

>>70291806
I'm not shitposting, you're shitposting

>>70291806
He can't help it, look at the flag

>>70291813
No. He's going to make sexual assaults mandatory.

>>70291849

Taylor Swift, here I come!!!

>>70291813
If a female president was caught saying something degrading towards men, but couldn't act on it, would you let it effect your judgement of her?

>>70291667
America isn't a democracy.

>>70291892
I would support her making mandatory sexual assault on men mandatory

but only from pretty girls.

>>70291908
if not democracy what it is?

I swear, they're going to narrate it to their grandchildren one day, feeling as if they were one bit """"""""""""""brave""""""""""""""""" to do this.

>>70291952
"We kicked some trashcans over and broke an uninvolved stores' windows! #SMASHFASCISM"

lol

>>70291068
>Won popular culture
True. That's probably why your young easily influenced mind became a leftist
>Won public opinion
>Lost the elections
The fact that you don't seem to see how this two statments contradict each other is hilarious

>>70291940
The Wizard of Oz.

>>70292038
Those statements don't contradict each other. We have a system where you can lose the popular vote and win the election, which is what happened.

>>70292009
"Those police-officers, well wouldn't you believe it but they had batons and armors, and I swear that more than once I saw them flexing their arms! But our numbers were too great, and so Trump's fascist corps did not dare rain down us! I now know what it was like to be a Jew in Auschwitz!!!"

>>70292088
Is this system new? First election it's been here?

>>70292121
No. But what does that have to do with my point? I only said popular opinion is against Trump. The Israeli said that contradicts the election result, I explained how it doesn't.

>>70290809
>>70291088
this is high level russia shilling, I'm impressed.

>>70292172
All you've convinced me of it that California's popular opinion was against him.

Thank God the founders of our country had the foresight to insure that shitty date doesn't get to dictate to the rest of us by fiat.

>>70292286
It's not just California that's against him. It's women in all states, it's non whites in all states, it's young people in all states.

Can you justify the electoral college other than by saying you hate how urban people vote?

>>70292346
weren't like 42% of his votes women?

>>70292398
42% is not the majority.

>>70290571
good

>>70292172
Winning popular opinion implies someone/something being undoubtedly popular, not having a 1% advantage where it doesn't matter while having more money and dominance over media support.
And the way liberals chimpout right now before Trump has done anything really hurts their chance to change the minds of people that voted for Trump. It's litteraly an attak on their right to vote differently in the name of democratic values. Rerarded beyond belief. Your only hope is for Trump to do really badly but that's a retarded hope as well because than you're hoping for the very thing you are demonstrating against.

>>70292471
Wtf I love Jews now

>>70292414
it's not a neglegible minority, either, it's pretty close to half, you know.

>>70292172
>Popular opinion is against trump
>Less than 1% of the population
Wow

>>70292346
>It's women in all states,
Not me and not any of the other women in my family.
>it's non whites in all states, it's young people in all states.
And what's your point? I can just as easily reply that white people and mature people in all states did support him. That's how he won. Or are you making the argument that only the young and dumb and the hordes of brown be allowed to vote?

Maybe next time you idiots shouldn't take election day off if you actually want to win.

File: Screenshot_2017-01-23_07-30-31.png (723KB, 818x825px) Image search: [Google]

723KB, 818x825px

>>70292398
>>70292499
Women didn't really vote against trump

>>70292529
That fact that it was any percent in favour of the candidate that didn't win means it clearly wasn't a democratic election.

>>70292591
Probably because it wasn't a democratic election because america is not a democracy, but a republic. The system is that way so that two states don't decide the fate of the country for the rest of them because of population numbers.

>>70292471
>Winning popular opinion implies someone/something being undoubtedly popular, not having a 1% advantage where it doesn't matter
We're not talking about who has popular support, clearly nobody does, we're talking about who doesn't have popular support. Trump's approval rating is between 30 and 42 percent depending on which poll you believe. Even Fox's poll puts him at the lowest approval rating of any incoming president since they started taking polls.

>And the way liberals chimpout right now before Trump has done anything really hurts their chance to change the minds of people that voted for Trump.
Trump HAS done things already though. Unconstitutional things even.

>It's litteraly an attak on their right to vote differently in the name of democratic values
The vast majority of the protesters weren't violent. There were 230 arrests and millions of protesters. It's part of our constitution that people are allowed to protest the government, that IS democracy.

>>70292591
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representative_democracy

>>70292554
If 42% of women did vote for him, 56-58% or so didn't. Still a huge margin of difference for an election.

Which way is Trumps presidency going to go? Do you think these riots, looting, and mass vandalism will continue for his entire term? The whole country seems to have gone mad. Nobody likes it when their horse doesn't win, but it's not grounds for this shit. If the civil unrest continues until he is gone, it will set a precedent, that's effectively the death of democracy, caving to violent liberals and their unrealistic ideals. I'm interested to see how it all pans out

>>70292646
>Probably because it wasn't a democratic election because america is not a democracy, but a republic
America is a liberal democracy with a two party system.
>The system is that way so that two states don't decide the fate of the country for the rest of them because of population numbers.
Yet that's exactly what happens with the electoral colleges.

>>70292666
Yes, and in a two party system the fact that the elected outcome isn't actually representative of the majority means it is a failed system.

Are Americans somehow conditioned to feel disgust towards anything which doesn't fit their worldview? Both sides of the election are just so hostile towards each other while here it's mostly just a bit of banter.

>>70292549
>Not me and not any of the other women in my family.
Wow, I have a conservative family too. Big deal. That doesn't mean the majority of women voted for Trump, they didn't.

>And what's your point?
You tried to downplay the amount of people who opposed Trump with your comment about California.

>I can just as easily reply that white people and mature people in all states did support him.
They aren't the majority, why do you assume 60 year olds are more mature than 30 year olds?

>Or are you making the argument that only the young and dumb and the hordes of brown be allowed to vote?
No, I never implied that. How old are you btw? Why do you hate young people? And what's wrong with the "brown hordes"?

>>70292763
>Yes, and in a two party system the fact that the elected outcome isn't actually representative of the majority means it is a failed system.

Then the 3 largest states would pretty much dictate every single election campaign. Which means the candidates wouldn't even bother campaigning to the other states.

How would that make sense to you? This isn't a new system in the US, and both candidates knew this going in, which is why their campaigns were setup the way they were.

>>70292745
While this was unheard of in the past few elections, I don't think these will continue for too long or be expressive in any way. The biggest feud in his term will be vs the mainstream media.

America will change, but not through this nonsensical violence.

>>70292815
Except all the swing states are very populous too. You don't see candidates spending much time in Wyoming and Rhode Island.

Why should the opinion of someone be worth less based on where they live? Can you justify it without falling back on just not liking how urban people vote?

>>70292860
>Why should the opinion of someone be worth less based on where they live? Can you justify it without falling back on just not liking how urban people vote?

I just told you. Because there's more parts to a country than California and New York.

>>70292860
And in this case someone's vote is worth less, in your preferred way someone's vote means absolutely nothing because they can never affect any election.

Isn't that FAR worse in your opinion?

>>70292745
They'll get their gibs, one way or another. :^)

>>70292890
If California was a swing state, it would be the only state candidates cared about. Your point makes no sense. I still don't understand your reasoning.

>>70292928
>in your preferred way someone's vote means absolutely nothing because they can never affect any election.
But that's not true. My vote means nothing under the current system because I'm a Democrat in a red state. Republicans in California can't influence anything under the current system either. That isn't the case based on the popular vote.

>>70292779
>You tried to downplay the amount of people who opposed Trump with your comment about California.
Because when you remove that one state Clinton loses the popular vote, bigly. Your majority argument completely falls apart and it only propped up by a state where coincidentally illegals are allowed to vote. What are coincidence.
>And what's wrong with the "brown hordes"?
Aside from many of them being illegals? Probably the culture of parasitism where their voting decisions are not made on what's best for the country as a whole but made based on who will take as much from white people and direct it into their pockets as possible.

>>70292745
They'll settle down and realize Trump isn't a nazi or wants to kill women and hispanics and blacks.

Nothing much will change really

>>70290571
>amerifats in charge of demonstrating

>>70292989
>Because when you remove that one state Clinton loses the popular vote, bigly.
But that state IS a part of the Union. You don't see me arguing that Texas's opinion shouldn't matter because they're big.

> Your majority argument completely falls apart and it only propped up by a state where coincidentally illegals are allowed to vote.
Illegals are not allowed to vote in California. Your electoral college argument compeletely falls apart and it is only propped up untruths to support it. What a coincidence. http://www.snopes.com/california-motor-voter-act/

>Aside from many of them being illegals?
Illegals can't vote.

>Probably the culture of parasitism where their voting decisions are not made on what's best for the country as a whole but made based on who will take as much from white people and direct it into their pockets as possible.
Flip whites and non whites and that's exactly how people feel about Republicans. You aren't exactly helping dispel the notion that Trump supporters are racist...

>>70292659
>depending on which poll you believe
Why would I believe polls? The onse that are published support the view point of the publisher. According to them Hillary is president, Brexit never happened and Netanyahu lost the elections like 4 times already
>Trump HAS done things already though. Unconstitutional things even
He didn't do anything while in office. You are referring to claims of what he supposedly did that were part of the pre-election propoganda. Those claims were considered by the public and rejected as unreliable or unimportant by the vote.
>It's part of our constitution that people are allowed to protest the government, that IS democracy.
I didn't say they were not allowed. I said that they are counterproductive and undemocratic in spirit because the protest is against the results of free and fair elections. I mean, what is the aim of the protest? To make someone cancel the elections because you lost? It's just an attempt to demilitarize the president because you don't agree with him and it will backfire hugely. It will either make him even more popular by putting his voters on the defensive or make your sides's president illegitimate in a similar way if he wins next time.
The fact that someone you don't like won the election is not dangerous to democracy. Not accepting the results and deligitimising the voters of the winning side is.

>>70293120
I don't hate jews anymore.

>>70293120
>demilitarize
meant delegitimize

>>70293093
>Illegals are not allowed to vote in California.
Oh bull fuckinf shit.

Does California require a voted id card when voting? No? Well then legals are functionally allowed to vote.

>>70293120
I cited conservative polls. Is Fox news liberal now?

>He didn't do anything while in office.
He violated the emoluments clause of the constitution.

>I didn't say they were not allowed. I said that they are counterproductive and undemocratic in spirit because the protest is against the results of free and fair elections. I mean, what is the aim of the protest? To make someone cancel the elections because you lost?
No, the point isn't to get him impeached or anything. It's to give the government incentive to become popular by compromising on their agenda. If they want the protests to stop, they need to compromise with the public.

>Not accepting the results and deligitimising the voters of the winning side is.
But we did accept the results. That's why we're protesting them.

>>70293192
Show me a single instance of an illegal voting. You have to prove your citizenship when being registered to vote, and when you vote, you can't vote twice. If millions of illegals voted, then millions of legals wouldn't be able to vote. So show me the evidence.

>>70293215
>I cited conservative polls. Is Fox news liberal now?
Yeah and we all know how much the conservative estbalishment adores Trump.

Fuck off with your bullshit, no one believes you people's lies and propaganda anymore. That is why you lost.

>>70293280
>Yeah and we all know how much the conservative estbalishment adores Trump.
I watch Fox news a lot actually, they do adore Trump these days. A lot of their anchors had different opinions during the primaries, but that stopped after the primaries.

>Fuck off with your bullshit, no one believes you people's lies and propaganda anymore.
Fox news is not my people though. I watch them so I can learn about what people who disagree with me believe so I can become more well rounded.

File: 1485005237476.png (247KB, 575x526px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 575x526px

Didn't DC vote overwhelmingly for Hillary?

>>70293252
>Show me a single instance of an illegal voting.
Show me a single investigation that was allowed to go forward in California.

They did one in my state during the recount. Guess what they found? A shit ton of voter fraud in the Democratic precincts of Detroit.

Democrats have been voting with dead people and illegals for over 100 years and are the only ones who in this election who got doing exactly that. But yeah I guess I'll just believe you instead of a pattern of behavior that has been well known and well documented for over a century.

>>70293361
Was almost as good as when Niggers burned down and stole from stores in their community because another black criminal got killed by police.

>>70293361
>destroy neighbourhoods and cities
come on they only smashed a bank and a starbucks right?

>>70290942
NCR
C
R

>>70293361
Yep, literally 93%.

That alone stands on evidence why she never be allowed within 200 yards of the White House.

>>70291088

FUCKING THIS

MAIDAN NOW

>>70293381
>Show me a single investigation that was allowed to go forward in California.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/08/06/a-comprehensive-investigation-of-voter-impersonation-finds-31-credible-incidents-out-of-one-billion-ballots-cast/?utm_term=.29f7f866ef8f
They caught voter fraud in California. Clearly an investigation had to be done in California for them to find that one single instance of it in California.

>Democrats have been voting with dead people and illegals for over 100 years and are the only ones who in this election who got doing exactly that. But yeah I guess I'll just believe you instead of a pattern of behavior that has been well known and well documented for over a century.
Show me the proof.

File: 1485065563956.png (3MB, 1632x2686px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1632x2686px

>>70290571
Daily reminder that antifa are literally shit eating cucks.

>>70291088
>>70293447
>New England secedes
>It joins the European Reich
it truly activates your neural almonds

>>70293465
>2014
Irrelevant. This election fuckwad.

>proofs?
Here you go. The usual Democratic voting fraud tactics.

http://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/detroit/2016/12/18/detroit-ballots-vote-recount-election-stein/95570866/

>>70293215
No, Fox news supports the Republican establishment that wants Trump to fail. As an American you knew that already but choose to disregard it to make your argument stronger.
>>70293215
>emoluments
That's just an opinion not a fact. It's a deeply obscure legal matter and I'm sure that you didn't even know about emoluments until it was said to you that this has some small chance to get Trump impeached. Which I'm sure it can't because he is smart enough to have good lawyers that will not let him make a concision decision to fuck up his greatest achievement and simultaneously ruin their firms reputation. In any case, if you are right there is no need to protest. He can be legally impeached and you should be happy that he did that.
>It's to give the government incentive to become popular by compromising on their agenda. If they want the protests to stop, they need to compromise with the public.
So you are protesting in the hopes of making a politician go back on his election promises? Than we both agree that the protests are against the other side's voters, trying to make their vote to mean nothing.
>But we did accept the results. That's why we're protesting them.
That's one retarded word play. How did you accept the results if you are protesting against them? It's like saying that you are against rape, that's why you're fucking her by force

>>70293595
>Irrelevant. This election fuckwad.
You yourself just said that historical patterns of behavior can be used to draw conclusions about the present.

>http://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/detroit/2016/12/18/detroit-ballots-vote-recount-election-stein/95570866/
> Those small numbers, which add up to 782 total spread out across more than 200 precincts, tend to point to human or machine malfunction as the culprit, rather than widespread fraud.
I think we're done here.

how comes wh*ite people just cant stop chimping out?

>>70293647
>No, Fox news supports the Republican establishment that wants Trump to fail.
How often do you watch Fox? Because that's definitely not the case.

>That's just an opinion not a fact.
George W. Bush's chief ethics lawyer thinks it is unconstitutional.

>It's a deeply obscure legal matter and I'm sure that you didn't even know about emoluments until it was said to you that this has some small chance to get Trump impeached.
Nope. I was taught about it in high school government class.

>Which I'm sure it can't because he is smart enough to have good lawyers that will not let him make a concision decision to fuck up his greatest achievement and simultaneously ruin their firms reputation.
He was dumb enough to get in trouble over Trump University and have several businesses go bankrupt. Powerful people get greedy and it leads to their undoing all the time.

>So you are protesting in the hopes of making a politician go back on his election promises?
Sort of. Democracy is supposed to be about compromises. A minority government should try to appeal to the majority so that they can become a majority government.

>How did you accept the results if you are protesting against them?
Because I'm not protesting the results, I'm protesting the actions of Donald Trump.

>>70293721
I wander why Allaric, really makes you think

>>70293660
>which add up to 782 total spread out across more than 200 precincts, tend to point to human or machine malfunction as the culprit, rather than widespread fraud.
Bullshit. Michigan doesn't use electronic votinf machines, they simply tabulate scantrons.

There is literally no possibly way for the machines to independently create votes for people who weren't there without voter fraud.

And coincidentally, as soon as this was learned of, Stein immediately withdrew her recount request. Yeah that's not suspicious at all.

>>70291068
>popular culture
yeah I suppose but that's nothing new. it's been like that for years and isn't changing anytime soon.

>public opinion
lol no

>>70293864
>There is literally no possibly way for the machines to independently create votes for people who weren't there without voter fraud.
The article literally explains how this happened though. Did you even read this shit or did you just google "voter fraud detroit" and copied the URL for the first result?

>>70293721
you tell us german, if anyone would know it would be the chimp out masters.

File: The-new-Germans.jpg (409KB, 3570x1680px) Image search: [Google]

409KB, 3570x1680px

>>70293981
>implying Germans are white

>>70293785
>How often do you watch Fox? Because that's definitely not the case.
I'm not going to get into he said she said with you. You know very well that Fox supported every republican candidate they could against Trump.
>George W. Bush's chief ethics lawyer thinks it is unconstitutional.
Again, a meaningless point. Bushes were treated really badly by Trump and this lawyer has no professional liability at stake when he claims that. As opposed actual Trump's lawyers.
>Nope. I was taught about it in high school government class.
Ok, I believe you, but I'm sure that you were not tough it at the level required to understand if what Trump did constitutes an emoluments or not as claimed by his lawyers / his detractors lawyers.
>He was dumb enough to get in trouble over Trump University and have several businesses go bankrupt. Powerful people get greedy and it leads to their undoing all the time.
He wasn't dumb enough because he didn't loose the case. Your just presenting it this way. Regardless, there is a difference between getting sued or even letting one of your groups company's to fail which is regular risk in business (like a carpenter risks getting his fingers smashed once in a while) and a top legal firm building a legal structure after winning the elections, knowing it will be scrutinized by the top legal minds employed by his adversities.
>Sort of. Democracy is supposed to be about compromises. A minority government should try to appeal to the majority so that they can become a majority government.
Trump was elected to execute the agenda he promised to execute. And he will do so operating under the checks and balances of your system. Your claim that he is somehow leads a minority government has no basis in law and in your system. Nor your claim that he should do anything different form what got him elected.
>Because I'm not protesting the results, I'm protesting the actions of Donald Trump.
You just argue for the sake of appearance and its boring.

>>70294346
>You know very well that Fox supported every republican candidate they could against Trump.
Sean Hannity jumped on the Trump train pretty quickly. And the other anchors did as soon as the primaries were over.

>Ok, I believe you, but I'm sure that you were not tough it at the level required to understand if what Trump did constitutes an emoluments or not as claimed by his lawyers / his detractors lawyers.
His "detractors" belong to the same party as him.

>He wasn't dumb enough because he didn't loose the case.
He settled, which is an admission of guilt. Trumps ego is so big that if there was a slight chance he could have won, he would have fought the case.

>Trump was elected to execute the agenda he promised to execute.
By a minority of the population.

>And he will do so operating under the checks and balances of your system
One of those checks and balances is the court of public opinion.

>Your claim that he is somehow leads a minority government has no basis in law and in your system.
He legally lost the popular vote, he has the support of a minority of the population. That makes his government a minority government.

>You just argue for the sake of appearance and its boring.
No u.

>>70291147
>>70291039
Bad bait

>>70294505
>He settled, which is an admission of guilt.
No it isn't. In fact most settlements explicity state that such settlements do not constitute and admission of guilt.

Why do you feel the need to just make shit up? Haven't you figures out that the left's constant lying is what got you idiots in this position to begin with?

File: crybabies.png (1MB, 809x886px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 809x886px

>>70290571
WE ARE PEACEFUL
*punches guy in red hat*
WE ARE PEACEFUL
*burns American flag*
WE ARE PEACEFUL
*smashes bus shelter*
WE ARE PEACEFUL
*gets hit with balloon animal and acts like they got shot*
WE ARE PEACEFUL
*attacks a McDonalds for some reason*
WE ARE PEACEFUL
*channels the power of Allah and explodes*
WE ARE PEACEFUL

>>70294922
So then why did he settle if he wasn't guilty?

>>70290571
hope more amerishits get involved with these turmoils

File: almost good commie.jpg (65KB, 800x599px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 800x599px

just communsit animals being put in their place.

If I was the commanding police chief I'd give order to open fire on them

this would send message to all the commies all over the world that USA is no place for them.


immigrate to fucking russia or some other yuropean commie shithole
komrade.

>>70295001
Who knows? Presumably it wasn't worth the time, money, and effot to litigate.

And you have no idea either which is precisely why resprenting a settlement whicb explicity rejects any admission of guilt as an admission of guilt is a bold faced fucking lie.

Do you people ever get tired of lying? Do you ever get tired with losing elections and not being taken as serious or truthful in the slightest by the voters?

If you really did believe in the merits of your ridiculous platforms then surely those would speak for themselves without the need to constantly make shit up.

>>70295222
You sir: move here right now and claim your rightful American passport and Colt 1911.

>>70290571
woah woah racist piggus

>over 3 million protesting

gg nice democracy america

trump wont even build a wall

>>70295249
>Presumably it wasn't worth the time, money, and effot to litigate.
Trump literally bragged on the campaign trail about how much he wins in court. It would help bolster support if he won yet another case. There's no reason for him to give up $25 million when he doesn't have to.

>Do you people ever get tired of lying? Do you ever get tired with losing elections and not being taken as serious or truthful in the slightest by the voters?
But we are the majority of the voters. Perhaps we are the majority because most people could see that Trump is a scamp artist because of things like Trump University.

>If you really did believe in the merits of your ridiculous platforms then surely those would speak for themselves without the need to constantly make shit up.
Trump's team literally coined the term "alternative facts" to defend the proposition that Trump had a bigger inauguration turnout than Obama when he didn't.

>>70294047
disgusting. I really wish you cucks would start defending your heritage and culture. america's always been multicultural but germany is a white country. start acting like you give a fuck, would you?

>this thread supports the one whom Putin supports
What did I miss? What happened?

>>70296801
How new are you?

>>70297507
4/10

>>70290571
Donald Trump! Donald Trump! Donald Trump! Donald Trump!
Fuck you OP. Donald Trump! Donald Trump! Donald Trump!

>>70295378
>But we are the majority of the voters
So truth and falsehood are now determined solely by their effectiveness in propaganda?

So you really are amoral communists, good to know.

>>70298570
But we voted for someone who believes in a market economy. That's not communism.