>be me >looking for a job online >find a website that

because you dont want ugly autistic fuck to sell roses in supermarket to random people, but qt young girl

>>69793902
Just apply anyway who the fuck cares

>>69793940
this
undeniable truth

>>69793940
these are all office jobs

>>69793902
Because it's illegal to deny someone a job because of their gender, so they put in the title and then just claim they can't use you for some other reason. The (f) or (m) in the title is actually better than not knowing why you got declined.

>>69794009
so they need to balance working enviroment, or they have gender quotas

>>69794066
>they have gender quotas

why is this?

Same reason subway in funland only hires cute girls.

File: 1483418743738.jpg (94KB, 1280x1811px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 1280x1811px

>>69794089
because good guys lost

>>69793902
>Job listings based on (m), (f), or (m/f)
Are you browsing the sexual favors part of craigslist?

>>69794156
what is craigslist

>>69793902
If a girl can properly operate a forklift or dig trenches or w/e Germans usually do, why should this job should be unavailable to her?

>>69794364
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craigslist
Supposedly you have it there, but it must not be a thing. It's just online classified ads.

>>69794364
It's a site where you can buy anything from used cars, homes, guns, and sexual favors

>>69794364
>>69794499
it's an online classified ads ............... commonly used to find casual sex partners

>>69793902
the "Antidiskriminierungsgesetz" forbids job offers for a specific gender

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allgemeines_Gleichbehandlungsgesetz

>>69793902
Because there are masculine and feminine versions of many words

>>69794694
jesus christ why can't you put some spaces between your words
We would write it as: anti-discrimination laws

arnti-diskriminierung Getsetz
See? Isn't that better

>>69794768
i really don't see why that would be better

>>69794815
spaces help you read. Why aren't you typing: ireallydon'tseewhythatwouldbebetter

>>69794768
It's not even better, just different. Stop being an ass

>>69793902
because most job descriptions are linguistically male. e.g. Lehrer(Teacher) Some feminists don't feel included under that term and thus you should say Lehrer and Lehrerinnen.

so most job offerings bypass that by stating (m/f)

>>69794853
because that's not what you do in english

>>69794364
It's American gumtree

>>69794893
Yeah? If it's just """"different""" why don't you start typing your compound words in one big word?

>>69795027
because that's not what you do in english

>>69795027
I'm not because I speak English and not German.

>>69795079
>>69795059
we do it this way in English because it's easier to read. I would say it's objectively better

>>69794768
So that we have to remember to put a hyphen between anti and Diskriminierungs, but not between Diskriminierungs and Gesetz? That's super annoying in English, I'm glad we have straightforward rules for that in German: just write everything as one word.

>>69795120
You seem to have an issue with reading compound words. That sounds like a personal issue

>>69795120
no it's easier to read to you and because you don't know how it works

>>69794969
Ha, it's the absolute opposite here. For example they don't want to be called presidenta but presidente

>>69793902
FYI you won't get that in France
I think job applications are genderless, photoless and all the rest

>>69795137
errr, yeah, there are some somewhat arbitrary rules

>>69795197
Our compound words in English would be separated into separate little words. It's the best way

>>69795266
Feminists always want the opposite of what is usual so they have something to bitch about

>>69795337
>Our compound words in English would be separated into separate little words.
Such as treehouse or peanut?

>>69794481
Isn't that exactly he problem?
If the guy that wants to hire someone just looks at her job application ans sees she's a woman, he might say "nah I don't want women"

Don't show gender = no discrimination

>>69795451
Sorry, I wrote bullshit, ignore it

>>69795451
You're actually not far off. Compound words usually evolve over time from being 'word1 word2' to 'word1-word2' to 'word1word2'. Generally speaking, you can think of compound words separated by a space as brand new coinings, compound words separated by a hyphen as slightly older coinings, and compound words without any space or hyphen as the oldest coinings. Both 'treehouse' and 'peanut' evolved this way.

The reason it works this way is complicated and probably comes down to how native English speakers perform lexical analysis on sentences.