1. Your country
2. Your city
3. Is your city aesthetic?
4. Is it the most aesthetic of your country?
1. Portugal
2. Coimbra
3. Yes, I think so.
4. I think we could make a case for it, yes.
1. Iberia
2. Segovia
3. Kind of
4. Subjective question
>>69576813
1.Spen
2.Cuenca
3.Yes
4.Doubt it
>>69577048
>>69576995
Hill-side cities are always great.
Our 2 or 3 flat-land cities are so meh.
>>69576813
>1. Your country
Apezil.
>2. Your city
Sao Paulo.
>3. Is your city aesthetic?
Depends on what you call aesthetic. Commie blocks aside, we've got some graffiti and a couple well-designed buildings like the Museum of Art. Overall it's a third world version of New York City with average-looking residential neighborhoods, so it hasn't much to offer in this regard. If punk looks is your thing though, you might end up liking the shadier parts of this place.
>4. Is it the most aesthetic of your country?
Hopefully not.
>>69577383
No, I meant a city as a whole, so small details like graffiti or poorer parts.
That picture of São Paulo looks pretty great, actually. It doesn't have a focal point to look at, but the colours are pretty nice.
I like Ouro Negro as well, but I'm biased towards that.
>>69576813
1. Hungary
2. Budapest
3. Yes
4. I think so, although there are a number of other aesthetic towns I could imagine living in for a couple of years
1. Poland
2. Kraków
3. Yes
4. Yes
>>69576813
>Your country
Portsugal
>Your ""city""
Tomar
>Is your ""city"" aesthetic?
I'd say it's historically aesthetic
>Is it the most aesthetic of your country?
No
>>69577887
The layout reminds me a lot of Coimbra in the OP. Is that where you have the parliament building? Cause if so, then it's disqualified for not being fair to anyone else.
>>69577968
Did those old buildings survive the war, or were they built anew recently?
They look too clean, but classic, so I'm guessing rebuilt or at least repaired.
>>69577980
Cosy.
>>69576813
Canada
St. John's
Yes
Arguably, yes
>>69578128
Kraków wasn't touched during any of wars since XIII c.
They're all 100% original
>>69578345
Well then, good job at that.
>>69576813
Flag
Mexico City
The historic part, certainly
I think it would be a tough call, you've got stuff here you couldn't find anywhere else but in terms of an harmonious picturesque whole, there certainly is a lot better, Guanajuato would probably be it.
>>69578128
Yes, the OP picture actually reminded me of Buda Castle, too, I guess it's just how people way back during the middle ages chose to build their castles next to water, on top of a cliff or a hill, with the town below.
Also, yes, the Parliament's in Budapest.
>>69578784
In my pic it's a University. One of the oldest in Europe. I really like my pic because it looks ready to be painted in oil.
The Hungarian parliament is just cheating, though.
>>69578875
Looks beautiful, m8.
1.Turkey
2.Bartın
3.Yes !
4.No.
>>69576813
1. Portugal
2. Évora
3. Yes, definitely
4. Don't know if it is the most aesthetic, but its definitely close to the top.
>>69579873
Where's Geraldo?
>>69579912
Giraldo, its the open space with those buildings with arches in the bottom half of the pic.
>>69579982
Based.
I've never been to Évora.
>>69576813
1. Portugal
2. Santarém
3. I think so
4. Nope
>>69580045
That statue is not located in Évora, its on a small village called Valverde about 10km away.
1. USA
2. Pittsburgh
3. Sort of aesthetic, depends on your tastes. I really like the way parts of the city look.
4. No, I would put several other cities ahead of Pittsburgh.