Are you satisfied with the representation your country got in Civ 6? Your country IS relevant enough to get into Civ games, right?
>>69459264
Guatemala was a vassal state to the aztecs, that counts right?
Absolutely satisfied.
And I understood that it'd be funny if Hillary could have won the elections because she will represent USA in all computer games forever because muh diversity muh equality
Why are they all so ugly
>>69459264
Not enough brown people.
>>69459433
I doubt it. They don't use leaders more recent than the 1940s, aside from Stalin who was most famous for the 40s and just happened to live into the 50s.
>>69461300
Stalin came to power in the 20s though
>>69462276
Sure, but he's remembered for WWII.
you asking this again?
yes I am
>>69459264
>Victoria
>No, not Britain, England
But that's wrong. Since King James, Scotland, Wales and England are all ruled by the same monarch.
>>69464099
They probably did it so they can add the Celts later. Probably led by Boudicca.
expansion pack when
Didn't know Jadwiga was such a qt
>>69464603
You'll never get above city-state status.
>poland
>relevant
whaat? colombia should be there instead
>>69465509
Colombia has done fuck all but fight itself since independence
Gran Colombia was a mistake
>>69465548
delete this
>>69465509
Poland is historically important.
Well there was Temudjin in Civ5.
>>69459337
meh, it's a stapple, at least they've gone on record making that Moctezuma Ilhuicamina and not the better known Xocoyotzin
Nezahualcoyotl would be the patrician choice, tho technically an Alcolhua he was still a ruler of the empire