Why do Indian movies always incorportate multiple dancing/so

Indians aren't cucks who unironically pay money to watch pretentious fuckwits enact a boring sob-story for 120 minutes. They'd rather be entertained.

>>69194729
>>69194970

I doubt that's really the reason behind that.

>>69194638
In classical Indian theater plays, you can find a lot of dancing and singing intermissions, a tradition that has perdured even in Bollywood movies.

Weused to do that in America too you know.
It eventually got too expensive to have a hundred people in the background suddenly bust out singing and dancing in tune.
Apparently in India youcan get a hundred singing and dancing fagtrons on a dime.

Most Indians are poor and these kinds of movies are is one of the few kinds of entertainment they can afford so there's demand for movies with as much shit in as possible

>>69194638
Danish movies used to also always have songs. I think it happened because a lot of people in the movie industry used to have a background in theaters.

>>69195234

And what's the reason for that? Is singing and dancing of deep religious significance?

>>69195276

Actually that's true.

File: IndiaTv12a8f3_mithun-dance.jpg (60KB, 750x533px)

60KB, 750x533px

>>69195276
>Apparently in India youcan get a hundred singing and dancing fagtrons on a dime.
butifel Slavic women do it for a nickel.

And you all thought >designated white servants was just a meme :^)

>>69195276

These people are clearly professionals though, they probably didn't cost pennies.

File: Screenshot_2016-12-29-14-10-08_1.jpg (20KB, 386x248px)

20KB, 386x248px

Reminded me of this scene, Indians make pretty catch songs
https://youtube.com/watch?v=NKRAQcWnCng

>>69200108

I know right. I didn't know I was into that shit until today tbqh