[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

What does /int/ think of women serving in the military? Does

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 161
Thread images: 36

File: original.jpg (783KB, 1785x1424px) Image search: [Google]
original.jpg
783KB, 1785x1424px
What does /int/ think of women serving in the military? Does your cunt's armed forces have them?
>>
Russia
yes
>>
File: QT2.jpg (73KB, 960x600px) Image search: [Google]
QT2.jpg
73KB, 960x600px
There's a few women in my barracks. Not in my battalion but they seem to put the work in anyway
>>
before anyne goes crazy i just want to point out there is a difference between in the military and the infantry
>>
They shouldn't be serving in combat roles

Other than that I don't care
>>
>>67680261
>work
tell us about theirs
>>
File: MI35 womyn 2.jpg (73KB, 592x410px) Image search: [Google]
MI35 womyn 2.jpg
73KB, 592x410px
Yes. Mostly seems to be lesbians anyway.
>>
>>67680422
They do the same PT we do and the same duties like 24hr guard duty and shit.

They have the option of doing push ups from the knee but the two I know do regular ones
>>
>cunt
yes
>What do I think
I think they're absolutely butifel

I mean, it's common knowledge that people here who wind up in the army either volounteered for it, or their grades were so shit they didn't know what to do with their life so they went to the army

But the grills are still butifel
>>
Fitness requirements should be by mos/afsc/nec instead of by gender 2bh
>>
File: tulsi_gabbard_high1a.jpg (2MB, 1909x2030px) Image search: [Google]
tulsi_gabbard_high1a.jpg
2MB, 1909x2030px
Tulsi Gabbard a cute.
>>
>>67680447
Weaponized lesbians
>>
>>67680187
In the paramilitary, air force, but only desk jobs in the army.
>>
File: 1449983617982.jpg (224KB, 800x576px) Image search: [Google]
1449983617982.jpg
224KB, 800x576px
>>67680215
Russian women do not serve in the armed forces, they are the ones who are served.
>>
>>67680533
Is there much difference between men and women your military?

Over here they do easier pushups and get more time to finish the 1.5 mile run
>>
>>67680187
Germany, yes we have woman.

I would be against it during ww1 times and before that. People were getting crazy at the front and most woman would be raped by they own man hundred of times over. And they would be fighting over it. Perhaps woman only units? Dunno about that.

But today? We dont fight war in the same way. So yeahh 100% okay with some idiots joining the military.
>>
File: women in the infantry2.webm (2MB, 613x360px) Image search: [Google]
women in the infantry2.webm
2MB, 613x360px
>>67680187
My reaction? If they're not combat troops? They're probably sluts. If they are combat troops? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

(still looking for the version of this where the guy walks calmly by with his pack like it's nothing at the end)
>>
File: MI35 womyn.jpg (73KB, 620x465px) Image search: [Google]
MI35 womyn.jpg
73KB, 620x465px
>>67680559

look at her strong jawline.

That's a lesbian flag to me.
>>
>>67680447
>lesbians
no such thing
>>
>>67680650
I've seen that version. He looks like he just started the thing
>>
>>67680594
do you use toilets in the army
>>
>>67680595
Chivalry is still strong in Russia
>>
>>67680650
iirc the average grunt lugs around ~100lbs. Similar to the weight that a knight in full plate mail carries on his body.
>>
>>67680713
Bruh, it's the Indian military's job to create the designated shitting streets.
>>
File: coma2.jpg (14KB, 203x263px) Image search: [Google]
coma2.jpg
14KB, 203x263px
>>67680650
>>67680711
>yfw she's probably struggling a hundred feet from the starting line
>>
File: female-army.webm (783KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]
female-army.webm
783KB, 480x360px
>>
>>67680650
i recall seeing somewhere that this was the end of a 12 mile hike or something
>>
File: woman on training course.webm (3MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]
woman on training course.webm
3MB, 320x240px
>>
>>67680736
This

https://www.quora.com/What-kind-of-toilets-does-the-Indian-Army-use-in-the-Siachen-glacier
>>
File: ZOMGWARISMYSOGINYPLSHELAP.webm (338KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]
ZOMGWARISMYSOGINYPLSHELAP.webm
338KB, 640x360px
>>
File: woman firing assault rifle.webm (3MB, 696x528px) Image search: [Google]
woman firing assault rifle.webm
3MB, 696x528px
>>
Armybro here. They're worthless. Mostly just fucktoys for the entire platoon and 90% of them become pregnant in a few months of enlistment.
>>
>>67680810
Worth mentioning that she's a reporter and not a soldier
>>
14% of our military is female.

I don't have any issue with it, as long as they are kept to the same standard as men I don't see a problem. Basic training is tough enough that any weak spineless bitches are weeded out pretty quickly
>>
>>67680810
She needs a hug
>>
>amerifats posts
>>
File: M-Keegan03.jpg (164KB, 750x937px) Image search: [Google]
M-Keegan03.jpg
164KB, 750x937px
>>67680187
It can be alright.
>>
>>67680921
too cute to be a soldier imo
>>
Because the army is typically a boys club and they get their rocks off from having a "NO ICKY GIRLS ALLOWED" approach. Making them look weaker shows them that they aren't just useless brain dead hillbillies.
>>
File: IMG_1220.jpg (18KB, 300x366px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_1220.jpg
18KB, 300x366px
>>67680187
qt
>>
>>67680946
i bet she does some desk job at best. and the photo was taken to allure ugly losers to serve in the army.
>>
File: Michelle Keegan beac (4).jpg (1MB, 3721x2436px) Image search: [Google]
Michelle Keegan beac (4).jpg
1MB, 3721x2436px
>>67680946
>>67681016
kek, she's an """"actress""""
>>
I think women are good at some roles in the military, but combat units are a big no-no. Not all guys fit for all combat units as well, so nothing is shameful about that.

Military is a big organization, with combatants being only 1/4th of all the personnel. There are a lot of important roles that doesn't require physical prowess.
>>
File: Brits and Americans.jpg (145KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]
Brits and Americans.jpg
145KB, 800x600px
>>67680946
>>
>>67680994

Motherfucker are you just an idiot or simply trolling? The military is there to kill people, they don't care where you come from or who you are. As for your "useless brain dead hillbillies", those brain dead hillbillies as you call them are one of the largest groups within the military protecting your rights and freedoms.
>>
File: afghanistan-3-way_2375926k.jpg (93KB, 858x536px) Image search: [Google]
afghanistan-3-way_2375926k.jpg
93KB, 858x536px
Would get down and give 20.
>>
>>67680994
>the army is typically a boys club
BECAUSE MALES ARE BETTER AT EVERYTHING HAVING TO DO WITH COMBAT.

This is biological fucking fact. Men are stronger, taller, faster, and socially more ready to endure every bit of bullshit that comes with a military career.

People don't want women in the fucking military because they are a drag on units and doing that in actual combat GETS PEOPLE KILLED. Stop pretending to be a fucking ostrich and get your head out the sand you fucktard.
>>
>>67681126
Why is it only Americans who post stuff like this?

Is it because our military is shit with training women?
>>
>>67681126
THAT'S ALL BIASED SHIT TAKEN FROM YOUR ASS SO YOU CAN USE IT AS AN EXCUSE TO ACT LIKE A FEDORA CHIVALROUS RETARD PROTECTING "WEAK" WOMEN THAT WOULD SHOUT "RAPE" FROM YOU TOUCHING THEM WITHOUT A SECOND THOUGHT.
>>
>>67680187
We have them as frontline medics sometimes. Besides that only non-combat roles
>>
File: kawaiii.jpg (216KB, 1200x480px) Image search: [Google]
kawaiii.jpg
216KB, 1200x480px
>>67681014

Japan, why?
>>
>>67680187
I don't like it. I wouldn't be able to take an order from a woman in battle, especially a bitchy one on a power trip. Then of course you have the physical and mental inferiority, as well as all the other problems that arise from mixing women with men in military situations.
>>
>>67681189
JGSDF army are nerds
>>
>>67681203
>>67680820
Well, if men would stop being misogynists and quit raping every girl in the platoon...
>>
>>67681184
How is it biased? Are you off your medications or something?
>>
>>67681184
Its not "biased" its literally just Biology.

Testosterone as well as other hormones produced in the male body make them much better at taking stress, pain and everything else that comes with a job in the military.

Women simply are not suited for the conditions of combat because its just how they are built.
Trudi Banning was fucking left infertile after spending too long out in the field during training because of an infection in her vagina that still causes her lasting health problems.
All because she thought she was like one of the boys and could handle being out in the wilderness without taking care of her personal hygiene.
>>
>>67681359
theres more to being in the military than infantry
>>
Nah. Not teaching girls to fight. That's the problem. Every girl should have karate/wrestling/mma/other instead of gym until highschool, where they can choose something else.
>>
>>67681387
>there's more to being in the military than infantry
>or artillery
>or airforce
>or tanks
Literally only navy and helicopters left aside from non-combat roles
>>
>>67681438
Women are so much weaker than men IRL that it's absolutely pathetic.

They need knife and gun training if they're actually serious about staying alive and/or un-raped.
>>
>>67681470
>Women are so much weaker than men IRL that it's absolutely pathetic
In this day and age there are a lot more small, scrawny men.
>>
>>67681466
non combat roles are a huge part of the military, i dont see the problem with women in those
>>
>>67680595
same here in funland
>>
>>67681470
At full capacity we're about the same. That's why it's dumb for women to be exempt from violence. It's their fault for not lifting.
>>
>>67681466
There are numerous roles in the regular army and the likes of the navy other than combat ones. Mechanics, chefs, medic, physio, communications, driver, etc.

See which one you'd like to do m8.

https://www.army.mod.uk/rolefinder
>>
File: 1479702311790.jpg (159KB, 596x799px) Image search: [Google]
1479702311790.jpg
159KB, 596x799px
>>67681513
Except no, you're retarded.
>>
>>67681504
>>67681521
I don't think that women in non-combat roles is what we're arguing about.
>>
>>67681359
Men might be better than women at combat, but women are better than men at thinking and analysing. What it means is that each sex excels at different aspect within the military. This is literally the laws of physics, one cannot have all advantages and no disadvantages, there's always a trade off.
>>
>>67681530
At full capacity we're about the same. That's why its dumb for women to be exempt from violence. It's their fault for not lifting.
>>
>>67681552
>but women are better than men at thinking and analysing
is that really true though?
>>
File: 1300044776986.jpg (23KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]
1300044776986.jpg
23KB, 250x250px
>>67681552
>but women are better than men at thinking and analysing
>>
>>
>>67681544
this thread is about women in the military tho
>>
File: Female soldiers.jpg (241KB, 648x816px) Image search: [Google]
Female soldiers.jpg
241KB, 648x816px
PIC RELATED
>PIC RELATED
PIC RELATED
>PIC RELATED
PIC RELATED
>PIC RELATED
>>
>>67681560
>At full capacity we're about the same

No, they're not. Due to hormones and muscle distribution, a man who is the exact same height, weight, and level of physical fitness of a woman is 3x as strong as her.
>>
File: 1470856388907.jpg (50KB, 567x567px) Image search: [Google]
1470856388907.jpg
50KB, 567x567px
>>67681552
>women are better than men at thinking and analysing
>>
>>67681640
There's no fucking way that men are three times as strong as woman. You're just pulling this shit from your ass now, you tryhard macho faggot.
>>
The difference between men and women in terms of strength is why people don't like watching a man and a woman fight. Because in most scenarios if bith only have their fists, the woman is sadly going to get the shit beaten out of her. That's not sexism, men are just biologically designed with more focused muscle mass.

Not to mention that while women on average can take more pain (you need to in order to give birth), men on average can take more damage. Men in general can just live (albeit not easily) through physical damage that women would die sooner from.
>>
File: sex-differences-brain.jpg (125KB, 808x750px) Image search: [Google]
sex-differences-brain.jpg
125KB, 808x750px
>>67681582
Quite, there are more neuron connections between both hemisphere for women than men, while men have more neuron connections within each hemispheres than women. Men's executive function is more closely tied to their motorsensory skills, but women are able to communicate more efficiently between the executive parts of the brain.
>>
>>67681663
3 times seems a bit much but you sound ridiculously upset.
>>
>>67681552
False. The adult male brain averages 60 trillion neurons while the female brain averages 10 trillion.
>>
Take an action movie, how many times have you come away thinking about how cool it would be to go in a room and beat all the bad guys? Your perception of coolness has been affected by the movie, ie, using violence to defeat enemies.

Now imagine you were walking in the park and you saw some dude peeing in the bushes. You'd just think "Eh, it's some dude peeing in the bushes." but if it was a bitch peeing in the bushes, you'd be like brb gotta jack off.
>>
>>67681740
I'm just sick of women getting a free pass in life opportunities and from conflict, just because they're "weaker". True equality is when we can punch women and set the standards for them up to men's, and if they cant reach said standards then tough shit for them.
>>
>>67681799
Women aren't given a free pass from conflict because they're weaker, it's because they're less expendable.

It's just logic. A woman can only get pregnant once every 9 months and has to carry it to term, a man can impregnate as much as he wants. A woman is only able to create children for how many eggs she has of which she can never produce more of, she's born with all of them. More importantly, she's fertile for only 20-25 years. A man produces literally millions of sperm daily and in theory can reproduce his entire life.

Far less men are required to maintain the species than women, we have the easy side of the baby making.
>>
>>67681640
>these retarded-ass """""""facts"""""""
There is no goddamn study on the planet that can make me believe that a man and woman at equal levels of strength are in any way different. All these "studies" I assume you're pulling this information from are most likely unfounded idiocy created by beta males who wanted to get back at the "mean bitches" who didn't agree to suck their dicks just because they got a doctorate in being a shithead. Fuck your shitty studies and live in the goddamn real world, where men and women are actually fucking equal to everyone who isn't a pretentious cock.
>>
>>67681835
Men and women are physically different in terms of strength in ways that can't be overcome with training.
>>
>>67681835
>There is no goddamn study on the planet that can make me believe that a man and woman at equal levels of strength are in any way different
You're ignoring that they're NOT stated at equal levels of strength. Merely equal height, weight, and physical fitness (meaning either neither are out of shape, or both are). That does NOT take into effect that one produces a lot of testosterone while the other produces a lot of estrogen. One of them is the muscle-gaining hormone, the other actively weakens you. It doesn't take into effect that men's bodies distribute body fat and muscle naturally in different places than women do.
>>
>>67681873
Like what? Name one fucking thing that men can do that women just fucking can't that can be OBJECTIVELY proven (i.e. no rigged-ass studies).

>>67681884
>muh estrogen makes you weaker meme
If you did any research, dumbass, you'd realize that estrogen is what lets you BUILD muscle. Both it and testosterone do, you only lose strength when testosterone becomes estrogen because of cancer or some shit, and even then it only makes you less capable of muscle building, NOT that you can never get to the level of someone who has more testosterone. Look things up before spouting shit you know nothing about, you fucking infant.
>>
>>67681917
>Name one fucking thing that men can do that women just fucking can't that can be OBJECTIVELY proven
Throw a 100 mph fastball.
>>
>>67681917
Write their name in the snow? Sit on their balls? Be raped by a woman and not only go to jail for it, but have to pay child support if she gets knocked up.
>>
>>67681926
Just because it HASN'T been done yet doesn't mean it CAN'T be done. Invalid.
>>
Provided they don't get a lower set of standards I'm fine with it.
Yes.
>>
File: Neuron.png (142KB, 1280x688px) Image search: [Google]
Neuron.png
142KB, 1280x688px
>>67681760
Your information is incorrect. Perhap you're thinking about male using about 6 times more dentrites than female?

Let me explain. A typical male neuron collects more information through multiple active dendrites, but the trade off is it sends fewer information through the use of fewer active axom terminals. Female's neuron is quite the opposite. So no, male does not have more neuron than female, it's just that each sex uses neurons differently.
>>
>>67681960
Get back to us when it has been done then, bby.
>>
>>67681960
Argument from ignorance faggot.
>>
>>67680994
It's not a "NO ICKY GIRLS ALLOWED" thing, it's a matter of making sure that the soldiers pass the minimum physical standards. Women have lower physical standards because the vast majority of them, even with training, can't meet and/or maintain the men's level of standards.
>>
I'm not saying its impossible for women to be up to men's standards but on average they are not.

However, you're neglecting the psychological components which, while much harder to study, are every bit as important as physical. Not just how women respond to high stress environments but also the esprit de corps and how the presence of women affects the mentality of "mission first" when men are predisposed to want to protect women.

There's also the matter of the field day media would have when the first female PoWs are heard about and all the shit that would likely come from that.
>>
>>67681314
Because the army hates women. End of story. There are a lot of buff beefcake women out their that can fucking kick your ass. Its not that women are weaker, its that you enlist fucking barbie dolls in their instead, and the fact that all of your """charts""" are from the army means they are worthless.
>>
>>67682073
>It's not that women are weaker

Then why does women's pitching speed top out at 69 mph?
>>
>>67682073
The average man can beat the average woman, the strongest man can beat the strongest woman. It's a biological fact, down to the chemical composition of our bodies.

Your projecting your own hatred and insecurity onto the big mean hillbilly men.
>>
File: 1462939708884.png (27KB, 527x409px) Image search: [Google]
1462939708884.png
27KB, 527x409px
>>67682073
>I'm not sure whether this thread was a master-class in b8 or some tuff grill getting mad
>>
>>67682109
Its not a fucking biological fact, you dumb shit eating hick. Thats a biased idiotic though used by rednecks like you to not have women "soiling" the army. You all should be fucking hanged like the inbred hicks you are.
>>
File: 1472315219892.png (299KB, 768x768px) Image search: [Google]
1472315219892.png
299KB, 768x768px
>>
>>67681184
How is it biased?

The United States Army has a pretty fucking vested interest in finding the most efficient and effective ways of keeping their people alive while making the other guy's people dead. Women being weaker than men is a very hot topic because including them in combat scenarios, once again, gets the Army's soldiers killed for no good reason.

Also, nice argument you got there. Shout "NUH UH" then preform baseless insults.
>>
File: glass ceiling.webm (873KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]
glass ceiling.webm
873KB, 500x500px
>>67682120
>>
>>67682142
Well from all the misogynist shit I've heard about the army, their bias towards women being in the field is a lot more rational then your fucking charts.
>>
>>67682042
In raw strength, yes. However, on the topic of military, a war isn't won based off just raw strength.
>>
>>67682155
It's very hard to explain to people that have never served what a fucking nightmare it is having women in your unit is. They literally make your life a living nightmare and will drag everyone down. Having it easier than their male counterparts isn't enough. They want to be treated like queens.
>>
>>67682172
Then their boot camp instructor should be replaced by someone who actually does the job description.
>>
>>67680261
god damn i fucking love Aug
>>
>>67682120
What's untrue about it? Do YOU think you can beat a man in a fight?
>>
>>67682222
Nice quads. That isn't a girl btw, it's a troll from /r9k/ who wants to be able to hit women.
>>
>>67680187
The US military is filled with Redneck shit bags from the midwest and south. The women that join are one step above crack whores; white trash bitches with a healthy pinch of ghetto single mothers. Most of us that live in San Diego are just to see them dead.
>>
The average adult woman has comparable aerobic ability to a 14 year old boy. Women lack the muscle mass or the same ability to remain calm and collected under stress.
>>
>>67682120
not that guy, but I'm pretty sure it's undisputed that men on average have a greater amount of muscle mass by ratio to body weight than women
>>
Here's a story of a boy out performing an all girl's team and being banned from playing as a result
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/04/26/boy-field-hockey-star-kicked-off-high-school-girl-team-for-being-too-good.html
>>
>>67682326
He asked for data and sources, not an anecdote.
>>
>>67682349
>provide a credible source a boy, absolutely trouncing girls twice his age in an all girl sport mostly because he is a boy and is athletically superior
>duuuuhhh it doesn't count
At this point It would be like that episode of Spongebob where he keeps peeling back walls and walls of used diapers just to convince Patrick he's wrong.
>>
I never said women can't be smart, but there is a distinct difference in IQ ranges between women and men, it's actually quite well documented.
>>
>>67682414
>>67682326
>>67682304
>>67682172
You know what, fuck you assholes, I'm fucking done with this. But you know what, for all the shit you give Tumblr at least they don't fucking spout obviously biased opinions and call them objective facts, and are at least able to hold a rational conversation without resorting to apparently inherent fucking misogyny. So congratulations, 4chan, you officially are fucking stupider than Tumblr, the site you hate so fucking much because "feminists are dumb, amirite?".
>>
>>67682431
don't let the door hit you in the vagina on the way out
>>
>>67682431
BUTTHURT
U
T
T
H
U
R
T
>>
File: Men versus women.jpg (69KB, 615x391px) Image search: [Google]
Men versus women.jpg
69KB, 615x391px
>>67682431
Weightlifting olympic world records

Womens 75+kg
155kg snatch
193kg c&j
348kg total

Mens 69kg
166kg snatch
198kg c&j
359kg total

Mens 62kg
154kg snatch
183kg c&j
333kg total

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_world_records_in_Olympic_weightlifting

Sorry lassie, truth hurts.
>>
>>67681732
So how does this translate to "women are better at thinking and analyzing"? Couldn't the opposite argument also be true? Regardless, I don't see how your argument is relevant to a practical military context.
>>
>>67682431
>fuck you assholes
nice may may
>for all the shit you give Tumblr at least they don't fucking spout obviously biased opinions and call them objective facts
where are the proofs?
>fucking misogyny
le misoginweenie boogy man
>So congratulations, 4chan, you officially are fucking stupider than Tumblr,
no one here claims to be smart
>"feminists are dumb, amirite?"
well if you are a feminist then i can see why people would assume they are dumb
inb4 just pretending
>>
Biology is injust and sexist. Women and men should be genetically improved to be the same in the means of physical capabilities.

No b8
>>
>>67681835
Here you go, stupid:

http://www.livescience.com/46216-male-faces-evolved-for-fighting.html
>>
>>67682120
http://www.livescience.com/52998-women-combat-gender-differences.html
>>
>>67680187
Men evolved to be the hunters and protectors of the tribe.

Women's role throughout history has always been giving birth.

Some equality laws and birth control aren't going to change millions of years of evolution.

Women are physically weaker than men, it's why we have weight classes.

The only time I've seen women be effective is when they're literally fighting for their survival like the soviet women in ww2, or those kurdish girls right now in Syria.

Toughened third world girls who've been beaten and raped might be able to handle themselves, but spoiled first world western women who've been treated like untouchable princesses and delicate flowers because of feminism will never be able to do any heavy lifting let alone military work.
>>
>>67682146
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>
>>67682256
What's the picture in your post about?
>>
File: 1478151660279.jpg (37KB, 640x450px) Image search: [Google]
1478151660279.jpg
37KB, 640x450px
>>67682120
10/10 trolling

no one, not even the most extremist of feminists is crazy enough to believe that women are actually as strong as men

someone WILL fall for this
>>
>>67682889
You should see the rest of the thread. We all took the bait lel
>>
File: brit army NkEIXq2Tno.jpg (430KB, 1993x2847px) Image search: [Google]
brit army NkEIXq2Tno.jpg
430KB, 1993x2847px
>>67682910
>We all took the bait lel

I didn't, I thought this was going to be about qt army girls so posted some images. What the fuck happened after that I don't know.
>>
>>67682962
Typical /int/ stuff. Although only one poster seemed to be baited hard. Most posters acted like "Okay??" (confused as to why the troll didn't understand their fundamental arguments).

Post more cuties!!!!
>>
>>67680187
If they actually meet male standards then sure. 90% won't, but if they care enough to put in the work to meet them and don't try to jump out of duty by getting knocked up then that's fine.
>>
>>67682789
>Women's role throughout history has always been giving birth

And nurturing offspring.
>>
>>67682910
>We all took the bait lel

See me >>67682117
>>
Women also don't have the competitiveness or aggression to serve in combat.
>>
>>67683120
I was speaking generally, but yes, obviously not all of us were as cautious and clear thinking as you.

You actually pointing it out that it was bait took me out of the thread for a moment, and helped me to remember where I was.

Thanks for that.
>>
itt pogs and civvies
>>
>>67683192
Did/are you serving in the Australian Infantry? What's your take on all of this?
>>
File: 1478808042118.jpg (2MB, 3000x4000px) Image search: [Google]
1478808042118.jpg
2MB, 3000x4000px
>/int/ laughs at women in military
>still gets angry when women dont want enlistment to count for both genders
>>
>>67683243
It's like we're a website full of different people with different opinions or something...
>>
There's nothing in military service that a chick with a right mindset can't handle.

There's also definitely a double standard where gifs of women struggling on some obstacle courses are used to demonstrate how women are unfit for service. When I was in the army there was a lot of overweight people and 100 lb sticks who barely had coordination skills to walk in a straight line, yet no one gave them shit if they just put in the effort.
>>
>>67682598
Because the frontal lobe is the decision making part of the brain, and each hemisphere control a different aspect of executive action and information processing. Having more neurons interconnected between the two hemisphere of the frontal lobe means able to switch between different types of thinking process much more efficiently.

This is useful when commanding armies and making tactical/strategic decisions.
>>
Lebanon
Yes

They're present more in our armed police but they have a few roles they can fullfill in the army
>>
>>67680187
It's okay if they want it.
Yes, we have
>>
>>67682120
t. Strong indepedent womyn

Fuck off back to tumblr
>>
>>67680187
>What does /int/ think of women serving in the military?
its fine as long as they do not lower standards for them

> Does your cunt's armed forces have them?
sure there are a few thousand female officers and pilots serving in the army
there are also a lot of female police officers
not to mention logistics personnel who serve alongside security operations

although almost none fight as frontline infantry. there are a few snipers who work under special forces, and a few who work under police special forces

there is no conscription for women, although i would support it so that women can get out of the princess mentality a bit
not under mixed units though, because then the men would do all the work and the women would do fuckall
>>
>>67682855
Nigger soldiers kill white soldier for being married to a negress.
>>
>>67680187


Women don't belong in the Military.
>>
I'd much rather have women be pilots and logistics, but if some buff over-testosterone marvel of nature comes along and can make it with the boys, then yeah why not. I don't understand it when the standards are lowered for women: it just hurts the military functionality and is demeaning to women, so it's a lose-lose.
>>
>>67680650
That webm is torn out of context. She is struggling at the last meters before the finishing line after a 20 km hike and eventually makes it. The guys around her shouting at her is actually cheering.
>>
>>67680810
Why do women cry so much? My wife sometimes cries like a little girl at the most trivial shit and I always have to comfort her.
>>
>>67686071
>My wife sometimes cries like a little girl at the most trivial shit

Like when her Syrian lover forgot to call her back.
>>
>>67681521
Women make terrible mechanics.

t. a former submariner engineer.
>>
>>67686149
>60% "white" country and le minority meme
There are literally no refugees in my hometown, try harder.
>>
>>67681636
To be fair, a man would probably also get hurt trying to march alongside his comrades if he had to wear a skirt like that.
>>
>>67682657

>ywn have a musclegirl gf who can beat the shit out of you but chooses not to

Simply not fair
>>
>>67680261
>Irish army
>work
Thread posts: 161
Thread images: 36


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.