Thread replies: 14
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4
File: Edmonton suburbs.jpg (434KB, 800x1200px) Image search:
[Google]
434KB, 800x1200px
What do you think of the 10 biggest metro areas in Canada? Canada currently has exactly 10 metro areas with a half-million people or more. Halifax just misses the cut at #11 with 417,800 people.
The list:
>1. Toronto-Hamilton-Oshawa, Ontario - 7,289,700
>2. Montréal, Quebec - 4,060,700
>3. Vancouver-Abbotsford, British Columbia - 2,687,800
>4. Calgary, Alberta - 1,439,800
>5. Edmonton, Alberta - 1,363,300
>6. Ottawa-Gatineau, Ontario-Quebec - 1,332,000
>7. Québec City, Quebec - 806,400
>8. Winnipeg, Manitoba - 793,400
>9. Kitchener-Cambridge-Waterloo-Guelph, Ontario - 664,300
>10. London, Ontario - 506,400
>>
>>67679470
>>10. London, Ontario - 506,400- 0 post shown.
I MADE THE CUT
>>
File: Confederation basin in Kingston Ontario.jpg (180KB, 409x293px) Image search:
[Google]
180KB, 409x293px
>>67679470
Cancer
Cancer
Shit
Alright
Mediocre
Not a bad city, nothing exceptional
It's Quebec so it's cancer by default but other than that it's one of the better cities
Absolutely awful
Don't know too much, probably ok
Welfare shithole, also fuck Western
t. Kingstonian
>>
>>67679470
>half a million people is a metro area
what
>10. London, Ontario - 506,400
>Doesn't even call it New London
Canadians explain this
>>
>>67679470
I can see my dads place in that picture
woo
>>
File: Karte_Metropolregionen.svg.png (497KB, 771x1023px) Image search:
[Google]
497KB, 771x1023px
>>67679835
Metro areas are a meme
>>
>>67679820
>Quebec City
>Awful
Entire post goes straight into the bin lad
>>
File: More Edmonton.jpg (229KB, 1024x768px) Image search:
[Google]
229KB, 1024x768px
>>67679962
In Canada, it's just the urban areas defined by Statistics Canada. It's not based on political borders.
If anyone is curious, here are the next ten cities on the list:
>11. Halifax, Nova Scotia - 417,800
>12. St. Catharines-Niagara Falls, Ontario - 408,200
>13. Victoria, British Columbia - 365,300
>14. Windsor, Ontario - 335,800
>15. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan - 305,000
>16. Regina, Saskatchewan - 241,400
>17. Sherbrooke, Quebec - 214,500
>18. St. John's, Newfoundland - 214,300
>19. Barrie, Ontario - 202,700
>20. Kelowna, British Columbia - 197,300
>>
>>67679820
>Kingston
>Calling anyone else shit
>>
>>67679835
>Canadians explain this
Do they not have schools in Sri Lanka? Or even common logic?
>British settlers come to Canada
>Wow there's a river through out settlement just like my home London, lets call it London
>>
>>67680016
Go review your English on duolingo and reread what I said about Quebec City.
>>67680067
And where are you from?
>>
>>67680056
Had no idea Barrie was that big tbf
>>
>>67680078
>it's New York and New England
>>
>>67679835
500,000 people is usually considered an important indicator of urban development. It usually means an area will have certain features of a "city" (larger hospitals, airports, cultural stuff, etc.). It also has implications for things like waste management and infrastructure.
A million or more people is usually considered a "large" metro area while 10+ million is a "megacity." Megacities of over 20 million are kind of in their own category.
Thread posts: 14
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4