>good economy >politically stable >blacks and whites

>>67541150
What about Botswana?

>>67542508
namibia is white

File: 59408236.jpg (1MB, 2592x1944px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2592x1944px

Yes.

>>67541150
Zambia was unironically above Brazil in HDI terms until early 1970s IIRC.
Why did they stop growing?

>>67542612
6% white apparently

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/wa.html

>>67541150
Why is Namibia so much better than surrounding countries? It's much better even than RSA.

Is it the organised German influence?

>>67542844
See >>67542508
They're far ahead of the rest of Africa currently, but their violence and HIV problems are still pretty serious. If they somehow minimize both problems, they'd probably be the first African nations to become 1st world in about 50 or even 40 years from now.

>Life expectancy at birth is estimated to be 52.2 years in 2012 – among the lowest in the world. The AIDS epidemic is a large problem in Namibia.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Namibia

Yeah nah it's still shit

>>67541150
>good economy

Super reliant on resources, very limited infrastructure, low population, fucked hard by climate change and one of the worst inequality in the world. 2nd biggest jump in real estate prices after Dubai

>politically stable

pretty much only one party rules

>blacks and whites get on fine

The government pretty much sucks and favours white dick hard and neglects most of it's population barring the. Also land issues and stuff left over from colonialism and apartheid like massive land removals and poverty.

Don't kid yourself. Namibia will be left in the dust as development grows in other parts of Africa. It's basically province of south Africa at this point.

>>67542973
People like to jack off Namibia because of some meme factors and it's minute whiteness.

It's environment pretty much will borderline hard cap it's development hard unlike Australia.

>>67543082
What's better, Namibia or Botswana?

>>67543175
Namibia, but both have made quite rapid improvement in recent years compared to most of Africa

>>67542701
Blacks

>>67543241
ebin

>>67542920
11 States beat it and many are catching up to it HDI wise. The thing about many stats people use to show off a state development is that they rarely tell the whole picture.

For example Portugal looking at some of it's stats compared to Western Europe is behind on certain stats that you'd think state would normally nearly max. That is until you realise that Portugal made huge growths for a time period form the 60's.
Despite its gradual modernization and relative expansion since the 1960s, the educational system remained underdeveloped until the 2000s when it finally reached some of the developed world's best practices and trends. Thus the comparatively low stats in certain fields area result of their being people who lived before those changes occurred. Remnants of a worse time one can say.

>>67543175
Botswana.

The only good sub-saharan african countries are mauritius and the seychelles

>>67543419
Why? Genuine curious

>frog, bong africa went full shit
>german africa made it tolerable
hmm

>>67543885
German Africa was very shit though.
Any good development made in Namibia was majority south Africa.

>>67541150
Would love to live there

>>67543885
Nambiba was "Bong Africa" though for almost the entirety of the twentieth century. It was incorporated into the British Empire and administered by British officials in South Africa, after WW1.

Yes and Botswana too.

>>67543175
Theyre both far better than every other large african country so theres no point in comparing which is better.

>>67543885
It was total shit during the german reign because they just slaughtered so many people. Learn your history idiot