would be funny the reason trump won is cause sjw's didn't

>>67197499
such is the risk of rigging

>>67197499
I think Johnson may have cost her more.

t. would have voted for Bernie, but voted for Johnson

>>67197499
>that and of course people not voting in general

scratch that 60% showed up highest since Nixon it say's somewhere on a dutch site.

>>67197499
He literally won because the Democrats chose Clinton

>>67197499
I think it's more of an issue that the democratic party chose to deliberately fuck Sanders over - who like Trump had the support of the people - in favour of Hillary due to inner party politics. Trump is the better choice for Europe.

>>67197808
That leaves 40% of people not voting.

I think that's a pretty big issue.

>>67197848
Bernie would have lost even harder to him. "Socialism" is still a dirty word in America and the "loony lefties" rhetoric would have been even more persuasive.

>>67197499
Hillary lost because she could not energize the base.her VP did not court the far left (Tim Kaine is just some obscure centrist and they barely won his home state) she performed worse than Obama did in many key battleground states.

While she campaigning on bathroom signs, the Rust Belt was worried about losing their jobs. Trump was against TPP. Sanders was against TPP. Hilary was not.

it was the year of the outsider and the Democrats went with the most establishment candidate they could get.

Sanders would have kept it closer. People voted for Sanders because they liked him and were excited about him. Hillary voters mainly hated Donald Trump.

File: 1461120574244.jpg (145KB, 797x775px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 797x775px

>>67197974
I started supporting Trump soon as they chose Clinton to lead the democrats, desu

>>67197947
That's a minority genius and we have much lower voter turnout usually.

democrats last push to bring people to vote period was an attempt to bring blacks and hispanics out of their chairs.

blacks and hispanics don't vote and the whole "trump is a biggoted racist" doesn't work if minorities don't actually vote.

>>67197499
>>67197752
All the libcucks are actually butthurt at Johnson voters because of that lol

>>67197974
Wrong. See >>67197916

>>67198238
>all the libcucks
>referencing a post clearly made by a liberal
Nice reading comprehension, dipshit. I think you meant "all the Democrats."

>>67197499
i think those who voted sanders are not really sjw activists, but more of poor students who join such gatherings sometimes. most white sjws in the us in action making money are wealthy, and arent anti racism except for a few whites joining such groups. in addition, sjws on tumblr, reddit, neogaf and such are overestimated by alt-rights and goobers.

e.g. feminsm in america isnt a lefty activity in practice but only about themselves. the same goes for those lgbt groups.
sometimes they pretend to have a common liberal solidarity but its even only for the good of themselves.
the famous feminist cunt anita once proposed a racial segregation on her twitter account in all seriousness. it was not fake but real.

they are white to the core. no wonder they or most whites secretly hate clinton and voted trump. though it seems more than i expected.

>>67198390
You don't have to be a liberal to vote for bernie, dipshit

>>67197752
wouldn't Johnson voters more likely come from dissatisfied repubs then dems?

>>67199143
>a liberal is anyone who disagrees with me
Ok.
>>67199146
I can really only speak for myself.
>socially libertarian, fiscally socialist
>militantly anti-racist, but also anti-SJW
>free speech absolutist, but support my state's ban on billboards
It's almost like two parties don't really represent the plurality of beliefs in this country...