I know Sweden is getting colonize at the moment but are things really that bad? Explain yourselves for fuck sake. http://en.europenews.dk/Sweden-to-become-a-Third-World-Country-by-2030-according-to-UN-128028.html
>>66436809
Bump for Sven fetishes.
>>66436809
they deserve it because they spread Luthers faggotry and caused the 30 year war
>>66436809
SWEDEKEKS ON SUICIDE WATCH
BULGARIA BECOMES NORDIC
>>66436847
Why will Japan do so well despite being predicted to have a stagnant economy for all this time?
>>66436809
Yup. And its due to the political environment and being political correct no matter the cost.
>>66437008
robotic gfs will probably cost a lot so it'll increase workforce participation and productivity just so guys can get anime gfs
>>66437028
Will the Sweds revolt at some point? My country is a fucking mess but it's nothing compare to you guys. Is their a light at the end of the tunnel?
>>66436845
What about you? Is it getting better in Germany? Are people waking up?
>>66436809
Bump
>>66436847
>France to become 3
So everything's going well ? Good, good...
>>66437337
How are things in France?
>>66436809
>list place Libya above Sweden
LOL, what bullshit.
>>66436847
Mexico can into developed world?
>>66436809
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKFkkWzltQs
>>66436809
That chart was based on an economical drop that happened one year. It is not based on reality, only if the drop would stay the same every year. The drop changed the next year and the prediction was disregarded straight afterwards, only idiots who don't even know what it is based on refer to it now.
Thank you.
>>66436847
Those are already wrong since they changed the methodology, at least do it properly.
>>66438123
>he thinks people will listen to reason rather than keep pushing their bollocks articles with no sources
People hear what they want to hear.
>>66438123
See, now you're the one bullshitting. We haven't had an economic drop, we're having an economic boom.
>>66438358
>didnt even bother to read
>>66436809
>using "alternative" news outlets as if they were legitimate sources
>>66439493
>it's not MSM, therefore it must be true!