What's the point of Bosnia ? Why the serbian republic of Bosnia isn't simply part of Serbia ?
>>65797078
>Why the serbian republic of Bosnia isn't simply part of Serbia ?
Because nato didn't want it to be
>>65797418
This.
Thanks France.
>>65797418
What does the Nato gain from it ?
>>65797078
there are bosniaks everywhere, even in the serb-majority places.
they should all reunite under bid daddy tito again tbhfam
>>65797891
There are also bosniaks in Serbia, Montenegro and Croatia but they're not part of Bosnia.
>>65797078
Because we genocided Muslims in Srebrenica.
We went too far, senpai.
>>65797876
protection from a pro-russian elements I guess
>>65797876
>>65798075
this. Nato was still trying to weaken Russia in the 90s and Serbia = Russian ally
>>65797955
as there are serbs, croats, and even albanians in croatia, serbia, etc.
it's just that they split along the inner yugoslav borders that the commies had set, so no point about arguing what is fair or not because at the end of the day they are all the same nation with different religions and dialects (except the albanians of course).
>>65798139
Kind of like the Israelis and Palestinians are the same?
>>65797876
The whole balkans
>no russian ally
Serbia was and is friendly to russia ,now in case of a war , at most it'll stay neutral
>no balkan group/alliance
A romanian-yugoslav,bulgarian alliance/group was considered in the past at various times . With yugoslavia/serbia down , romania wouldn't have agreed to it cause it's tactically stupid compared to nato, bulgaria won't side with the russian with romania in the north,greece and turkey in the south (They're also not best friends with the serbs) ,basically also forcing them into nato
This basically pushes the potential front to the black sea completely which is under nato control
>>65798075
>>65798127
Sure, ok...but really, how gaining 1 million of Serbs would make Serbia strong again ? It's a small country, barely relevant at this point.
>>65797698
kek
>>65798279
I understand why the Nato wanted to dismantle Yugoslavia, but now what's the point ? Serbia already has troubles with Kosovo and Vojvodina. Yugoslavia is gone, Serbs can't be a threat to anyone.
>>65798278
i would say mizrahi jews and arabs are almost the same. ashkenazi jews and russian jews are more culturaly european than semitic.
another problem in israel/palestine is the language. unlike in yugoslavia, we don't have a common language. arabic and hebrew are as different as russian and czech.
>>65797078
Buffer country(sort of a dam that protects the whole place from ruination by keeping the savage Balkan spirits in check).
>>65797078
Enclaves are bad
>>65797876
A Serbian Enclave is a 1000% chance of a Nagorno-Karabakh conflict at our very doorstep and we can't have that
>>65798510
>Serbs can't be a threat to anyone.
Better keep them down to make sure they stay down
>>65801010
DELET
Bosnia is not a real country, should be divided up by Croatia and Serbia two real countries in the balkans.
What is the point of eastern europe in general?
>>65803175
Russia buffer, to allow actual civilisation to occur SOMEWHERE in Europe along the ages.
>>65797891
>1991
>>65797078
>Bosnia isn't simply part of Serbia ?
1. Serbia shouldn't have access to the sea.
2. Muslims already have too much land
If Hillary wins, Republika Srpska is fucked, she has a massive hard on for "Srebrenica" and muslims in general, so that means a Bosnian War 2.0.
Also, Putin claimed Srpska and he won't let another slaughtering of Serbs happen so hopefully Bosnia will trigger another world war.
>>65809217
Hope more Serbs die tbqh.
>>65809837
T H I S
H
I
S
>>65809858
Glad a Serb agrees. Serbs are subhuman. They aren't even European, they're just displace Iranians with a Slavic language. They need to go back.
>>65810025
I'm not a skije
Fuck skije they need to die
Kosova for Albanians
graves for skije
>>65810100
I agree.