Thread replies: 7
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: The_Romans_of_the_Decadence.jpg (304KB, 1198x809px) Image search:
[Google]
304KB, 1198x809px
i've been reading up on art history and right before the internet became mainstream, the art world really didn't give a fuck about technique, sklll and aesthetic.
they valued idea more. aka conceptualism
that left a hole for skill in visual arts to come marching back in.
that's why a lot of people on this board focus on skill so they can draw better.
i want to know if you believe this too and/or what do you think the future of art will look like?
also, you're art is shitty and you won't get better even if you practice 500 years, but there is more to art the skill alone so it kind of doesn't matter.
>>
citation needed
>>
>>3131686
Fine art =/= illustration
Illustrators placed a tremendous amount of importance to technique the whole last century.
>>
>>3131737
Mind elaborating on this lesson in art history?
>>
>>3131740
Google golden age illustrators.
>>
>>3131686
>i've been reading up on art history and right before the internet became mainstream, the art world really didn't give a fuck about technique, sklll and aesthetic.
I don't even need to read any further since it's quite obvious that this is either a shitposting thread or you are completely brain dead.
>>
>>3131755
To be fair, the age right before the internet became mainstream is like the modern art age.
Thread posts: 7
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1