if I call my art avant-garde, then I never have to improve

If you feel comfortable and happy about your art, then no.

>>3124750
>then I never have to improve my technique, right
Depends on what you want

>>3124750
Your "art" lacks any appeal.

>>3124750
yes and if you call it poignant and subversive you can sell it for billions

File: retard.jpg (40KB, 652x225px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 652x225px

>>3124750
> if I call my art avant-garde

You can't just decide it on your own. The Temple has guardians, and those alchemists can transmute lead into gold and claim shit to be art. Delete your thread, OP, go be avant-garde somewhere else.

>>3124819
Exactly, so you slap the term "avant-garde" on it and pseudointellectuals will pay thousands to shit up their walls with it

If you wanna make pretty little realistic portraits to impress people then technique is all you have, if you actually wanna make something cool its not mandatory

>>3124750
Only if you can manipulate others into buying it.
How do you think other trash artists get rich?

>>3125953
Well if this is the route you want to take then it's mandatory you attach a long essay to it looking far to deep for a meaning having to do with either yourself or current politics

>>3124770
>on your own. The Temple has guardians, and those alchemists can transmute lead into gold and claim shit to be
>>3124770
>>3124750
Were you on bath salts or is your brain naturally Swiss cheesed