"Look at that stupid fucking painting" - Joe Rogan

"Why don't you just draw a house?"

That's some high octane money laundering

>>3002446
Joe Rogan is a human testical. His thoughts on art are less than worthless.

What is so special about this bisquick fella anyway?

>>3002650
nothing, he was friends with warhol and lived in new york, enough said. his popularity is a result of a hype train.

File: 1495861894222.png (1MB, 1917x2163px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1917x2163px

>me the south american drug cartel money launderer and my stooges in the government

We need to start taxing this shit

>>3002650
>bisquick
fucking gold .

Joe is right

By the way, the worst excuse for modern art is

>well it's eliciting a reaction even if that reaction is your disapproval/hatred >arts subjective, hur hur

This claim anyone could make about absolutely anything placed in a modern art museum. Literally any object in the universe, just stick it in the museum, and it's modern art because Random Object # 28473 caused confusion, disinterest and disdain from the public.

So there is no art in these stupid museums. Just arbitrary assortments of objects, humans trying to get it, graduate students with no skill, rich people with no taste, etc

>>3002446
I'd love for a wealthy criminal/criminal organization buy one of my pieces for the actual purpose of laundering money.

>>3002705
Generally no modern art is not about eliciting a reaction. Where'd you hear that?

Duchamp did this kind of thing 100 years ago, literally 100 years ago, and people still get confused and angry with this type of art.

>>3002705
Also no, art is not about getting reactions, art is about contemplation

>>3006349
>Also no, art is not about getting reactions, art is about contemplation

Except no modern artist has ever managed to express anything with their art that was worth contemplating.

>>3002446
Money
Laundry

>>3002446
Well.. It is shit.

>>3006355
I just said one, Duchamp. You don't have to like him or his works but if you seriously think that his ready mades are not worth of contemplation then I don't know what to say.

>>3006358
i think its more an investment like most expensive art, he knows that he can sell it for more later

>>3002446
Joe rogan is 100% right

>>3006366

It depends of the laws in your country.
Where I live, you don't pay 1$ to the state if you inherit art from your parents.
It makes art really interesting to possess for upper-class people, because the Government will take a tidy sum based on the value of your parents's house if they die, the government will take a fair % on any money they had in the Bank, but 0% on any paintings they possessed.

The excuse is that it helps to sponsor the Arts.

>>3006349
>Reply
It's a little more than that, poseur.

>>3005284
Have you ever read about modern art like ever?