What the fuck is this? It's OBVIOUSLY a pipe.
Why is Magritte so full of shit?
But it's not. It's a picture of a pipe. :^)
>>3002449
Horseshit.
no, its an illustration.
It's a chimney for individuals.
>>3002443
It's a mouth fedora
>>3002449
not even that
it's a picture of a painting of a pipe
>>3002852
not even that
it's pixels of a digital picture of a painting of a pipe
>>3002443
It's gay
1.it's a mindfuck to a overall dumber generation compared to now
2.it's basically a troll meme as a painting, that's why "modern art" up to today might as well be meaningless
>>3002443
> t. a brony
gtfo m8
i dunno maybe magritte made it solid, then its not a pipie .d
>>3002932
Not even that
It's your brains interpretation of the pixels of a digital picture of a painting of a shape that fits your platonic idea of what a pipe is.
Pipe is also a french slang for blowjob
>>3003285
>Stick it in your mouth and smoke it then, that's what a pipe is for.
Not THIS pipe.
>>3002443
It's literally just a harmless joke
>>3004720
we're all just thoughts moving through light anyway, man
>>3005179
light?
>>3005201
yeah man
it's all photons
>>3005227
>yeah man
Then what are the photons emitting from?
>>3005227
im pretty sure no light is going through my head, ymmv
>>3002443
I never liked the metatextual 'postmodern' reading of this work honestly -- that the text refers to the work itself as an object rather than the pipe itself. It works better if, in the problematic space of a modernist work that both the pipe and the text share, that the text is contradicting specifically the presence of the pipe. So we see the pipe, and we see the text saying that the pipe is not a pipe, all happening within the context of the frame, rather than the text winking at you and referring to a world outside of the frame which I think it is not doing.
>>3002462
Best answer.
>>3005291
yes, that is cuter, for sure. I'll pretend i thought of that if ever it comes up in conversation.
>>3002443