>tfw giving a new read to loomis books after some years since

Where do I start with loomis

File: 12345676543.gif (3MB, 635x332px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 635x332px

>>2935531
>it's not a meme

>>2935559
Bump

>>2935531
post your work then. i want to see what loomis does to art.

>>2935531
h.r. geiger's website says buy a book on figure drawing , its will be the only book you ever need.

>>2935559
You need to have a decent grasp of observational drawing first, as well as being able to draw simple 3D forms like cubes and spheres in perspective (first part of drawabox).

>>2935627
literally look at the majority of pro artists, most people use construction methods similar or based around what Loomis teaches.
/ic/ calling Loomis and other sources a meme one of the more destructive memes on this godforsaken board.

if you need proof that knowing basic construction and proportions (which is what Loomis teaches...) is useful then I'm not sure what to tell you.

>>2935715

im not denying construction is fundamental but loomis is not the only one teaching it. since you said you recently re-read his books i would like to see your work before and after to see what particular effect it had in your art.