Is art subjective? And does realism =/= good? That's the

>>2844964
This is graphite? How the fuck? It's not shiny and shitty like a lot of realistic graphite drawings I see. Also, how did he get such dark value? Can graphite even go that dark?

>>2844964
drawing 1:1 is easy to learn/teach/useless in todays world. Realism from imagination is impressive though.

>>2844965
Good paper. Good camera. Good lighting. Don't shine a spotlight directly on your shit.

File: IMG_5011.jpg (2MB, 2302x2944px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2302x2944px

>>2844964
>And does realism =/= good?
feel like people are impressed by realism but generally less aesthetically attracted to it maybe. Wabi Sabi brah.

>>2844964
realism is pointless.

>>2848018

So is your existence

>>2844964
Watch art school confidential. It's a good movie and the easiest way I can explain it.

You got the main character who's very good technically but his work is very stiff and lifeless. You have his classmates who might as well be smearing turds on a canvas, and you got the guy at the end.


So basically I think if your art is boring then no technical skill is going to make me care about it. That's about it.

Yes and yes.