KIM JUNG GI

File: 1429328008421.jpg (571KB, 916x1100px)

571KB, 916x1100px

>>2822148

>>2822152
XD simply epic my dude

Fucking master...
Does anybody know if his sketchbooks can be downloaded somewhere?

File: 357642e8328674b120323fd1aa47f831.jpg (77KB, 500x669px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 500x669px

>>2822199
probably. i just own them in physical forms. you might have to do some digging

>>2822207
will start digging... thanks mate!

File: 1484783938780.jpg (50KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 300x300px

>>2822215
kek

>>2822220
kek (2)

>>2822199
CGPeers

>>2822247
Need an invite to register in CGPeers... ain't got none... (sigh)

>>2822148
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGbvhyTZXfs

>>2822255
shit is ridiculous... I do believe when people tell he has a photographic memory...

>>2822260
I honestly have no Idea. Maybe he just composed it out of his brain.
In an Interview he said he changed from making sketches to ink directly to making ink illustrations, because it saves time and since then he hasn't gone back which was like 6-8 Years ago. I can't remember.
But this guy doesn't need shit.
He's a machine in Human clothing.

>>2822253
>>2812856
>second link (korean)
>second and third folders in the mega

>artist has decent talent and skills
>wastes them all on utterly repulsive lifeless generic disgusting trash
Why must people like this exist.

>>2823139
post your work

Why are so many artists so obsessed with sex?
Lack of sex? Too much sex? Too much blueballs over figure drawing sessions?

>>2823139
To spite people who only knows to complain behind masks instead of working on their own skills.

>>2823142
I have neither talent or skills and my scanner is dead, so how about no.

>>2823150
>why do animals like sex I don't understand

>>2823160
I didn't mean liking, I meant obsession.

>>2823139

Found the hipster.

How the fuck is KJG generic? His work is pretty perverse and out there

>>2823165
>His work is pretty perverse and out there
That's the point.

>>2823164
It's the primary and primordial goal of most organisms: procreating. In humans it has the added benefit of feeling good for both, even being addictive. That's why.

>>2823173
That doesn't explain obsession as the majority of the organisms that use sex to procreate aren't obsessed with it.

>>2823164
there's only so many things you can draw. sex is a pretty big part of life so it's pretty natural to want to draw girls as a hetero guy. it's the same with literature or film, you can tell sometimes when someone is just enjoying describing "the curvature of a girls breasts" and stuff life that. think about shakespeare or any novel, media is bound to have romance in it.

>>2823174
>the majority of the organisms that use sex to procreate aren't obsessed with it.
How do you know?

>>2823175
>sex is a pretty big part of life
>it's the same with literature or film
You've never read philosophy and watch kinos haven't you.

>>2823175
>think about shakespeare or any novel, media is bound to have romance in it
except love != sex

Love is a form of emotional intimacy and dependency, sex is simply lust.

>>2823150
Humans like sex in general. It's just that artists can actually express themselves better about it.

Also KJG was always known to be a pervert, I wouldn't be pigeonholing artists in general with him.

because sex is fun to draw and interesting to look at....thats the answer.

>>2823179
again you can't draw concepts of philosophy. you can draw women and beautiful things in nature but not much else.

File: Vasari_painting_t640.jpg (133KB, 640x861px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 640x861px

>>2823184
Philosophy in art is poetic. By conveying aesthetic mannerisms we discuss the reason for our existence on earth emotionally.

Anyway, that's not the point. In a grand scale of human's existence, sex only exemplifies a very small, minor, and trivial aspect. An artist must find and look up to the highest meaning of our existence, or else he stays as an entertainer, not an artist.

File: 3.jpg (125KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 1280x720px

>>2822227
That perspective is wild, damn

>>2822148
so, are there any omphalos scans yet?
the lack of them are driving me crazy

What does KJG do to earn money? Does he have any kind of popular manwha or something similar?

All I've seen from him is random illustrations and doing murals to impress others.

>>2823198
so only christians are true artists?

File: uuuu.png (622KB, 600x780px) Image search: [Google]

622KB, 600x780px

>>2823214
He teaches, does comic art, sells art books, and gets payed to fly around the world and do big ass murals in ink (conventions, institutions, etc). I think he also does concept art on occasion. A jack of all trades really.

>>2823215
No, people who seek for the truth of their existence are the true artists. Christians just happen to contemplate their existence beyond the banal level more than most people.

>>2823214
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fIuBLbyp8eY

>>2823837
cannot even tell what he's drawing. what a mess. wow what a master.

>>2823223
>Christians just happen to contemplate their existence beyond the banal level more than most people

kys

>>2823864
I can smell your euphorya

>>2823204
no scanner, but i have it on my desk next to me. rip.

>>2823868
christcucks are just as bad as fedoras. Neck yourself.

>>2823903
Just take decent hq pics. Please. Quench the thirst

>>2823906
Whoa, calm down Achmed.

File: 1408948139834.jpg (484KB, 1224x552px) Image search: [Google]

484KB, 1224x552px

>>2823864
But he's right you materialist tard. Whatever you say about Christians at least they produced real art that communicated something higher than base animal desire

File: watchthemflyaway.gif (1MB, 500x273px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 500x273px

>>2824002
Testaments to the insanity of man and his inability to cope with his very existence. It's pretty deep man.

File: Creación_de_Adám.jpg (91KB, 800x373px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 800x373px

>>2824002
most "christian" artists were just commissioned by the church and actually didn't believe at all in christianity. They just happened to work for the best paying client at the time.

A lot of famous artists who worked for the church actually secretly resented christianity for their imposed rules that made it more difficult for them to properly study the human body. They also filled their work with symbolism that either ridiculed christianity or was meant to shake the dogmatic religious belief of the time.

>>2824070
>actually didn't believe at all in christianity
Gonna need some fact to back that up.

File: 1481948034238.jpg (200KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 700x700px

>>2824070
Yeah I've heard this shit before about Galileo too but it turns out he was a devout Catholic all his life. It's time to bin that Gibbon stuff anon, by modern standards he was a shit historian

File: 1476121032607.jpg (101KB, 513x486px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 513x486px

>>2823837
>4000 dollarydoo commission
>it's furry shite
Every fucking time.

File: IMG_1486.jpg (2MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3024x4032px

>>2823947
best i can do atm. sorry anon

File: IMG_1485.jpg (2MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3024x4032px

>>2825460

File: IMG_1487.jpg (1MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3024x4032px

>>2825461

>>2822148
how many sketchbooks do you think he fills a day?

>>2825469
at the speed he draws if he dedicated 24 hours. he could probably fill a few.

Do you think a guy like this must be seriously sexually repressed if he's drawing people fucking at least once a day?

Like, do you think he's happy with his sex life at all? Is he unsatisfied? I've found with a more consistent and better sex life, my drive to draw porn went down significantly.

>>2824070
>most "christian" artists were just commissioned by the church and actually didn't believe at all in christianity.
You're misrepresenting a valid point. Whatever your historical opinions, artists who wanted to survive followed the money, and the church had a lot of money. Calling most artists who worked for the church non-Christians is impossible to support. It's a fair point to question an artist's motivation, but churches had a monopoly on literacy and bookkeeping for a very long time.

>>2825484
Definitely. This artist is a slave to his desire. He doesn't even try to question and criticize his sexual desire like Balthus did. Typical unimaginative asian.

>>2825484
KJG is m arried

If you're not a gook how do you follow this guy?

Alternatively if you were rich how do you get him to make an art for you?

Seems like the bigger names sort of filter out requests like that.

Does KJG have autism? Is that the secret?

>>2825614
>Does KJG have autism?
Do you even need to ask?

Can I commission this gook to make a christian art?

>>2825614
>>2825638
>anyone who's exceptional at anything has autism
kill yourselves

>>2825641
>draws nothing but ugly people fucking and pop art
>not autism

>>2825640
in his 2016 book there's a pretty good picture of christ carrying his cross and all the guards n whatnow

File: kjg cross.png (2MB, 931x1286px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 931x1286px

>>2825640
>>2825656
took a pic of it.

>>2825661

Hey anon, I'm planning on buying one of his sketchbooks, are they worth it?

The 2015 is mostly nudity and the 2016 has almost 0 nudity, wat do?

>>2825664
i own the 2013 and the 2016. 2016 has some pretty sweet drawings, it has nudity but nothing explicitly sexual going on in it. but there is titties.
omphalos is literally a collection of his more erotic drawings.
so literally pick your poison. im going to pick up omphalos next, but 2016 has some really good stuff in it and i wouldnt regret getting it just for inspiration and ideas.

Everything seems to be there, but I still find his art so unengaging?

Can't really come up with a good answer for this.

Is this considered "illustration"?

What do you call this style? Are there similar artists?

Also is he using some sort of ink brush pen thing to make these?

>>2825661
I like this.

>>2825666
He's a skilled artist, but not visionary at all.

File: supplies.png (528KB, 525x700px) Image search: [Google]

528KB, 525x700px

>>2825671
pretty much any drawing can be called an illustration.
his bigger pictures can be considered murals.
and a pen brush.
pic related. second one on the left. I like using them as well

>>2825511
You can be married and still severely unsatisfied. His wife could not be giving him any, he could not be attracted to his wife, he could be conflicted because he doesn't like the act of sex but likes the thought, maybe he has kinks he's too embarrassed to ask his SO to try or she refuses to try, he could be impotent but still have the desire.

>>2825672
But he draw both serious things, wacky shit, everyday life, fantasy, things that SHOULD be interesting. Why does it all seem so bland and samey?

>>2825691
>serious things
What do you consider as "serious things"?

>wacky shit, everyday life, fantasy
Pop art, exactly.

>Why does it all seem so bland and samey?
His fixation on drawing exaggerated mannerism gets really, really tedious. It makes all his drawings a mess.

File: 790885482740885062.jpg (72KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 800x533px

Is he artistic?

>>2825695
>What do you consider as "serious things"?
for example >>2825661
>Pop art, exactly.
Explain.
>His fixation on drawing exaggerated mannerism gets really, really tedious. It makes all his drawings a mess.
Far from all his drawings are very exaggerated, I don't think that's it.

He seems like he has just a couple different things he draws and just got really good at drawing them.

>Robotic/mechanical things
>Nomadic people
>People having sex
>Oriental clothing and architecture

He draws like the same gangly dogs in all of his works, the same dudes in fur clothing.

Nothing wrong with sticking to what you know but that might be what the other anon was talking about.

Personally I really like his robotic stuff.

>>2825699

You forgot that he can draw most common animals pretty well. I mean, who the hell draws sheep from memory other than KJG?

>>2825698
>for example
Compared to the crucifixion painting of the renaissance era, where you can see a lot of people and objects in one picture conveying different emotions, doing different activities, and reacting differently to the passion of Christ, this doesn't seem to be well thought and convey much emotion.

>Explain.
Basically art that is created for entertainment. Most are based on popular culture. Robots, sex, fantasy, they're all popular entertainment.

>Far from all his drawings are very exaggerated
I don't think so. The perspective are always so much exaggerated. The lines are all noisy. There's no gracefulness to be found. Basically the term mannerism I used here is the same as the mannerism movement of 16th century.

>>2825713

You're comparing drawings that KJG knocks out in a afternoon to paintings done over a couple of months, retard. KJG is a virtuoso even compared to the old masters.

>>2825719
>You're comparing drawings that KJG knocks out in a afternoon to paintings done over a couple of months, retard.
Well then I want to see something he seriously put effort into, not some sketchy scribbles done in a few hours.

>KJG is a virtuoso even compared to the old masters.
"The old masters" are adored for the composition and meaning of their art more than their skills. Look at Giorgione, particularly his Tempest. There's an indefinite, transcendental meaning in The Tempest, that's why it's still widely regarded as a timeless masterpiece. The same with Da Vinci's Mona Lisa and Andre Rublev's Trinity. This is the true meaning of artistic vision. KJG's art isn't spiritual or visionary enough to be called a masterpiece.

>>2825728

>sketchy scribbles done in a few hours.

Opinion discarded. His brushwork is loose yes, but it's most definitely not sketchy and scribbly. He is extremely deliberate with every line he puts down on the paper.

>>2825733
Sketchy in planning the concept. They're scribbles because they have no gracefulness.

>>2825740
>my opinion is more correct than yours

>>2825728
>true meaning
>artistic vision
>spiritual
>nekkid bodies

Look nobody gives a shit about that you elitist prick. Art is about expressing yourself, KJG expresses humor through his artwork. KJG is every bit of a master as these old dead white people.

>>2824002
Communicated something higher? What? A flying spaghetti monster and some schizophernic fucktards who talked to themselves? Fuck off... at least KJG isn't delusional. There is nothing wrong with communicating sex, you wouldn't exist without sex retard, there is hardly anything more important than that. Life is simply about survival and reproduction. Everything else is really just passing the fucking time.

>>2825753
>elitist prick
I don't know what you mean by elitist. Wanting to see something beyond entertainment is elitist? I might be an elitist, but what about you? You only praise art from the technical skill it displays. You're an elitist in regard of drawing skills.

>Art is about expressing yourself
That's true, but how deep can you express yourself? What is it about your thoughts that can be classified as a masterpiece?

>KJG expresses humor through his artwork
How can you express the depths of your thoughts and emotions in search of the truth through mockery of the world?

>KJG is every bit of a master as these old dead white people.
Alright, that's a nice argument. You win, bravo.

>>2825762
Well, why exist at all? What does a man live through all the contradictions of life for? This is the subject that artists try to convey through art. The highest truth of all truth that defines our existence.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GP06EHog8B0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVn205YsQhY

Why aren't you Kim Jung Gi yet, the secret is
>dude boxes lmao

>>2825807
Trying to understand these two videos, watched a couple of times. Feels like draw the rest of the fucking owl man. Is there any book that explain this method?

>>2825484
Yes. It's probably one of the things that >>2825689 said. Or all of them together.

>lets project my insecurites onto someone else

Can you armchair psychologists just fuck off please. "omg he draws people having sex, he must have deep rooted issues!"
These posts ironically tells us more about you than they do about KJG.

>>2825699
>>2825695
>>2825666
Welp /ic/ has ruined his art for me, now I can't unsee.

File: marvelway.png (279KB, 1398x622px) Image search: [Google]

279KB, 1398x622px

>>2825807
Reminds me of Draw Comics The Marvel Way

>>2825753
>le white people maymay
Opinion discarded.

File: 1481677059059.png (119KB, 225x227px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 225x227px

>mfw im actually downloading Kin Junk artbooks right NOW
so long suckers! Im gonna make it! ;D

>>2825855
Are you downloading it from the post that other anon linked?

My internet is shit so I don't want to download the whole thing if it's just going to be a small part of it..

>>2822148

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzBmmU24ssg

Peter Han being a poor man's KJG.

>>2825857
Nope - found that i have a CG-peers account. havent used for 3-4 years i think.

>>2825859
Already looks more interesting than KJG.

File: ph.png (463KB, 597x596px) Image search: [Google]

463KB, 597x596px

>>2825859
If I'm not mistaking he said somewhere that KJG was a big influence for him. I like both artists very much and they both an inspiration for me.

>>2825864

Whatever you find more appealing is subjective ofcourse, but Peter Han is still light years away from KJG. It might look similar on superficial level but the consistency in perspective, gesture and anatomy is just in another dimension in KJG's work.

File: KJG.png (403KB, 779x527px) Image search: [Google]

403KB, 779x527px

>>2825825
I don't consider myself much of an artist but I think the way he manages to get the unique perspectives in his works is because of his box style. Instead of the entire composition adhering to a global perspective he handles each unit of the work individually.

In his huge crowds each human seems to overlap and interact with each other. If you look at pic related, the plane that the desk is resting on does not align with the plane that the human laying on its side in front of it is laying on.

This is obviously just his rough work as an instructor but you can see it in his actual work. He focuses on the local space that each individual piece of the work occupies as opposed to the whole work itself.

>>2825873
To try to clarify (because I'm shit at getting my thoughts out), it's a trick of the eye when it comes to his character interactions. The overlap of these 3D shapes create their own local space that only exists because it is on a 2D plane. However, as the artist he builds up the work by considering each piece on a 3D level. The man crouching behind the body laying on its side is a good example. The box overlap of the mans head and the woman(?)'s shoulder create a local 2D space that allows the eye to bridge the gap quickly. But if you actually look at the bounding boxes you realize that the man is kneeling near her feet and his head would actually be a lot further back from her than it would appear.

>>2823139
>Why must people like this exist.

You should consider watching a movie called Amadeus.

>>2825728
Old masters are adored by... who? People who make up their own opinion and other people flock to follow them?

Yeah The Old paintings are amazing, doesn't stop anything currently from having the same impact to people.

File: 2084404375_0eee0ac2_0426.jpg (366KB, 718x800px) Image search: [Google]

366KB, 718x800px

Why is he so lewd bros.

>>2825879 >>2825879
Nice word salad. Objects being in front of other objects is a revolutionary technique for sure.

>>2826002
Maybe art is just not your thing, man. Maybe you should just read comic books and stuff.

>>2826729

>implying comic books aren't made by artists

>>2826736
>comics
>art
trash, kill yourself

File: grills.png (833KB, 600x780px) Image search: [Google]

833KB, 600x780px

>>2825643
I think his girls are pretty sexy

Is he some kind of savant or something? Can normal people achieve this level of sketching?

>>2826849
Most people think he's autistic or has photographic memory or something. Who knows though, maybe it is achievable for the rest of us.

>>2826849
Lets be real here; he seems to be one of a kind.

If you watch any of his lectures or videos where he explains stuff, there is no magic technique. It's literally dude boxes lmao shit you can find all over the place. So if it's not his super secret technique it's his work ethic right? But that implies KJG is somehow the hardest working draughtsman alive which seems doubtful. Undoubtedly he draws a fuck ton, but so do other artist.

You could probably get close to KJG skill level, but I doubt you'll ever be 1:1 with him.

>>2826896
I read in some interview (don't remember which, so can't provide sauce) where he said that he remembers everything he's ever seen.

>>2827014
>>2826849
It's possible to reach the levels of guys like peter han who essentially draw like him and even cushart who has a remarkable visual library(90% of his figure studies are from imagination) but Kim Jung Gi is on a completely different level. He had a head injury as a child which may have contributed to his photographic memory

>>2827014
he just have the longest history with his technique

as younger artists get inspired by him, it will take them fewer years to reach his level, and then some more

just wait another 20-30 years and he will be just the first of many

File: 1463019474225.jpg (3MB, 2029x2976px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2029x2976px

>>2826782
Stay pleb tier, family.

>>2825783
>the highest truth of all that defines existence.
for some people just making art is their highest truth. you are saying this like you know what it means for everyone, and what it means is spirituality through christianity. you're being a condescending judgemental prick and you probably don't make art.

>>2825666

I think he's okay, but the more I look at his stuff the more I think he's just a decent artist with an insane work ethic. When he's good, he's really good, like that tattoo shop pic or the shark dentist, but more often than not his linework is really scribbly and not very expressive. Like >>2826462 is a good example of his typical drawing. At a flash it's impressive in a "Wow, he drew this in only a few minutes, and the perspective and anatomy are on point!" kind of way, but as soon as you scrutinize it stops being impressive and just looks dull. Why is the guy's left hand so bad? Why do the girls' boobs look not only fake, but kind of metallic with that shading? Why are the shirt and bed sheets the most expressive thing in a picture of two naked people? Why is that head so bad?

>>2827101
based on the dude's lower lip and eyebrows, the tits are suppose to look bad

File: kim_2011_sketch_collection_2.jpg (85KB, 614x424px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 614x424px

>>2825691
>Why does it all seem so bland and samey?
In my humble opnion, it's because usually his pieces have everything at once. A lot of things "happening". A same page have what you said: serious things, wacky shit, everyday life, fantasy.

But pieces like pic related much better.

File: Untitled-2.jpg (202KB, 1011x695px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 1011x695px

>>2827068
But no one does anything without a reason. There has to be a reason why someone draws, it is to fulfill one's desire. Whether it is to entertain other people, to challenge himself, to express his thoughts, to show off his skills, or just to fill the void of his life. Even the cavemen had a reason to draw. Now to make his artwork valuable, an artist has to find a ultimate reason and desire behind his motivation of drawing.

Spirituality is looking beyond our trivial desires to find the ultimate truth. Desires need to be based on reason, and the highest truth is the root of all reason. The activity of drawing by itself can't be the ultimate truth, that is a very shallow way of introspecting yourself if you consider that to be the ultimate truth. How can you not know the reason why you do something?

I'm not a good or even remotely acceptable artist by any stretch, I'm a beginner, but I do draw. Here's an instant 10 minutes HB pencil drawing, without guide and without reference, I made for you.

>>2827337
>Spirituality is looking beyond our trivial desires to find the ultimate truth

Spoiler: There isn't any. "Meaning" is something you give, not derive. You do stuff because you want to, and no other reason. Now get back to drawing, scrub.

>>2827353
Even if you're not a believer of the existence of an objective or absolute truth, you'd still need a lot of time to think about and construct the meaning you want to give to something. Why do you want to do stuff? You don't just "want" to do stuff.

I lost the reason to draw and stopped drawing for a long time due to that existential crisis. That was because I just wanted to draw when I started, I didn't even know why I wanted to draw. An artist like that will easily give up when they face a hurdle. In order for a man to create will, spirituality is important. Without spirituality, that man is nothing much more than a dysfunctional automaton. Maybe "autistic" is the more humane term.

>>2827369
>You don't just "want" to do stuff.

There is a scientific perspective (the axioms of which the vast majority of people implicitly believe in) that would support the notion of arbitrarily wanting to do things.

>>2827337
I'm not spiritual at all. I don't believe in gods or ghosts or karma or any other mumbo jumbo like that. The reason why I draw is because of a need to create. If I don't make things I get depressed and don't work properly.
And it doesn't have to be drawing, even if that's the most common one. It can be repairing stuff, building legos, photography, writing. It's on the level where I hardly even find it (especially drawing) fun any more. But it's still something I have to do. Like eating, or taking a shit. And I mean, you don't have to believe in a god to feel if you need to take a shit.

>>2827369
>An artist like that will easily give up when they face a hurdle.

If you gave up in the face of a hurdle, you enjoyed avoiding the hurdle more than the joy of jumping it. Odds are you dabbled in something because it was cool at the time, but ultimately it just wasn't for you. There was no great existential crisis, you just had changing tastes and freaked the fuck out over it for no reason.

>>2827373
If everyone put so much thought into the meaning of their life, everyone would be an artist or a philosopher. Screw mere artists, the world would be filled by overmen. The truth is, the process of defining the meaning of our impulses takes quite an effort, that's why the majority chooses to eat up axioms without much further thought. People are just too lazy and scared to observe the mirror.

>>2827398
>that's why the majority chooses to eat up axioms without much further thought

the axioms I mention are not ones that are prescribed by some higher authority, rather they are naturally intuitive to the vast majority of people i.e. inductive reasoning, cause-and-effect, the independent existence of the world to your consciousness, etc.

>>2827388
That's not what I meant by being spiritual. A spiritual man simply questions the meaning of existence.

>The reason why I draw is because of a need to create. If I don't make things I get depressed and don't work properly.
You just want to prove yourself, that's the reason why you create. A self actualization. But in order to create something that is truly meaningful, self actualization isn't enough. An artist has to have the desire for transcendence, an overcoming of the self to master ultimate truth. The reason why modern art is banal and selfish is because the artist refuses to leave this self actualization stage and overcome themselves.

>>2827391
>you just had changing tastes and freaked the fuck out over it for no reason
Yes, my taste changed because my desire wasn't solid enough. Even simple desires need to have a meaning behind them, or else you will eventually be sick of it.

>>2827404
I believe that those axioms are just as banal. How does causation apply when you don't even know what causes it? "The independent existence of the world to your consciousness", or in other word, ignorance. Inductive reasoning, I don't even know how this logically applies to the creation art, unless the person is autistic.

>>2823219
and a master of all lmao

>>2825832
This anon! Speak it brotha! One life guys. Do whatever the fuck you wanna do. There will always be judgemental people trying to put you down. There will always be haters. No matter what you do.
The art is being able to walk on nails. Endure the pain of the moment and trust in yourself. Fuck the critics! They don't know the wear and tear these feet have endured. Keep yo head up bra

>>2822260
he is CHEATING bruh

no amount of hard work can give photographic memory :(

love this

Does nobody know if he actually has photographic memory or not? Someone must have asked him in the past

File: Sketchbook-2016.jpg (87KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 960x720px

>>2829160
Read the interviews on his English fansite. He studies objects and people every single day.

How can you draw so well without photographic reference? Is there a certain way you train your self?

I observe things all the time. I don’t take references while I’m drawing, but I’m always collecting visual resources. I observe them carefully on daily basis, almost habitually. I study images of all sorts and genres.

How can you create such perfect images of fish-eye perspective?

I’m always thinking about perspective and space, and when I’m drawing I try to expose my knowledge as much as I can. I’ve never been taught about fish-eye perspective by someone. I just naturally got used to it as I’ve been constantly observing space. To give you a tip, understanding the principles of cube is a big help.

When did you start drawing? How, or with who did you learn?

I’ve been drawing since I as a kid. I went to an art academy for the first time in the summer vacation of the second year in high school. I’d never been taught by someone, but I studied Korean college examination art in the academy.

How can you draw so well without guidelines?

I think anyone can do it if one has a strong image in his/her mind. Of course it requires practices. You need to be confident while you are expressing your vision with your hand. It may seem difficult at first time, but practicing will make it easier.

>>2825469
Saw an interview with him once in which he said to draw everyday like... literally every single day. Even if it's a 10 min sketch...

>>2825862
Would you be so so kind of inviting me in? ... (sweats profusely)

>>2829611
I think every person interested in art would recommend that

>>2825832
(OP here) Props to anon! Jezz, I just wanted to look to some cool KJG drawings, not start World War 3 on the philosophy of art...

File: ss.png (11KB, 455x197px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 455x197px

>>2829614
Just wait the day they will open registration again.

>>2829615
*nods in agreement*

>>2829618
much obliged anon. your kindness is appreciated.

File: Pieter_Bruegel_the_Elder_-_Hunters_in_the_Snow_(Winter)_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg (383KB, 1280x911px) Image search: [Google]

383KB, 1280x911px

He has the capability, but he's not drawing like Bruegel. He's an unimaginative faggot. Kys weebcuck.

>>2824070
The church didn't commission Hudson River School painters to do anything. They were a deeply religious bunch who sought to express the glory of god upon the landscape all by themselves.

Michelangelo took over as architect of St. Peter's Basilica til the end of his days. He was a pretty devout Catholic.

The list goes on. Lets end this bullshit meme that the church and the arts/science weren't tied together.

>>2825859
Han may not be on KJG's technical skill level yet, but WHAT he draws is far more interesting most of the time. I can only look at KJG's sketchbooks for so long before the novelty of his skill wears off and the actual content starts to bore me.

>>2829983

Irrelevant, I'm simply talking about pure skill in drawing here since people were saying he was close to KJG skill level which he is not.

File: hb_19.164.jpg (955KB, 2000x1478px) Image search: [Google]

955KB, 2000x1478px

>>2829852
Yeah, wooah, what a master...

>>2825859
>them arms
Every single time.

>>2829889
Why do christcucks always confuse people believing in god with people believing in the church? Michelangelo was a homosexual and a scientist, he dissected human bodies and had sex with men. How could he have believed in the dogma of the catholic church if it basically said he's going to burn in hell eternally?

The church at the time was simply the richest client and hired lots of top talent to work for them. That's all the church did for art. It's obviously a great thing they funneled all that money into art, but that's literally all that tied the church to the arts, money. I guess some artists also enjoyed the fantasy themes, but for that they could as well draw from greek mythology.

>>2830073
>he dissected human bodies
Dissection was never really prohibited by the Church, only illegal for non-scientists. There was a prohibition of dismembering the crusaders from the church, but no prohibition of dissection was ever exist. The prohibition was often misunderstood.

>had sex with men
Literally no proof. He might liked male models, but that accusation is baseless.

>The church at the time was simply the richest client and hired lots of top talent to work for them.
And the problem is? It was their responsibility to God.

>>2829852
"what are opinions and what do I do with it?"

>>2830221
In art, theme is just as important, if not more important in a few places, as technical skill.

>>2830031
What's wrong with them?

>>2823215
>>2823198
>you are not
art·ist
ˈärdəst/
noun
a person who produces paintings or drawings as a profession or hobby.

unless you're a philosopher.

uh... yeah you are.

>>2823181
>there is no love in sex
What are you? A prostitute?

>>2823139
>Stop drawing what I dont like!