Does anyone have a link to the full book this is from? It's

>>2683086
if you care, iirc there's a page or so in keys to drawing on local values and light patterns, the same stuff that's in your picture

>>2683114
No I don't want that. I like the way Hiroshi Misawa draws and I find his images really clear. I want his book specifically.

File: 1409007993047.jpg (23KB, 220x300px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 220x300px

>>2683119
same guy here, found it in the archive

>>2683119
>>2683121
*haven't found a link though

second

bump I want this book too...

Where can you buy this book?

>>2686595
image search of the cover returns a few Japanese sites but no amazon or anything like that.

>>2686602
that's a lie

https://www.amazon.co.jp/gp/product/4798603767/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o00_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

>>2683086
i bought it. it's not so great and the biggest drawback is that only the female body is referenced. you'll get more out of loomis than this shit

>>2687349
Can you scan it?

File: Misawa Hiroshi(三澤 寛志)-カイ-2.jpg (121KB, 873x1423px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 873x1423px

>>2687349
but the author of that book made THESE http://www.kaifineart.com/2014/01/misawa-hiroshi.html

baemparudy, I'd like this one as well

>>2687405
It's like if loomis was a gook goddamn

>>2687665
>gook
grampa is that you

File: balloonface.jpg (664KB, 2322x4128px) Image search: [Google]

664KB, 2322x4128px

>>2687405
yea but too bad he didn't think it was important to or doesn't know how to share his knowledge of art. same round faced model throughout the book and deviantart-tier anatomy tutorials. some are very laughable, like this one

>>2687720
I dunno, looks good to me. I can't read Japanese but he's obviously talking about going from larger masses to more detailed shapes.

>>2683114
diff anon here. do you know where I can look for the page you speak of?

>>2687730
Don't have it in front of me, but chapter 4, towards the end (or just the chapter on light)

>>2687720
Just scan it and let us be the judge anon! :)

>>2687724
Something that hasn't been covered ad nauseum in countless other drawing books, right?

>>2687808
So what? What's your fucking problem? Are people not allowed to talk about things that were covered before? Are you autistic or are you autistic?

>>2687809
>lol getting that worked up

File: n8umjWj.png (3KB, 698x1284px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 698x1284px

>>2687869

>>2687809
The point is that his supposed method is neither taking a new approach nor is it even giving a good explication of an old idea. That page is not useful to anyone.

File: b.jpg (424KB, 1254x885px) Image search: [Google]

424KB, 1254x885px

took all the pages available on amazon (like 5) plus a few:

https://mega.nz/#!k1EBERoZ!78EQb66id9hMTFrz33glHHDwLBzpy0O8eKoLdUW_EvI

someone correct me if i'm wrong, but it doesn't look like anything not already in keys to drawing or loomis. and of course it's also unreadable to 99% of us.

>>2688095
>>2688129
shhhhh!
critical thinking = autism