Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
File: a959095e0a2efe7496a1090144338e18.jpg (227KB, 736x1137px) Image search:
[Google]
227KB, 736x1137px
Is dynamic sketching a meme?
It looks like a lot of courses now teach this as the foundation to learning. Scott Robertson teaches this Art Centre as the foundation course. FZD teaches this to new students. Peter Han teaches this at cgma and concept art academy.
So is dynamic sketching the way forward?
Like imagine if you put in hours into dynamic sketching and it doesn't work. You would have wasted a lot of time doing boring exercises.
There is also no historical basis for dynamic sketching. Past atelier did not do draw a thousands straight lines or thousands of boxes in perspective.
>>
It's one of many different ways of learning art. There is no one singular correct path as we all learn it a little differently. If you're learning from it and it's working for you, great, if not there's always other options.
>>
>>2672637
>week 1
>>
>>2672637
viscom memer here, definitely 100% worth it
>>
posting in a rep thread...hold on lemme wipe my ass on that post # >>2672637 *wipe wipe wipe* ah feels so good
>>
File: 02806102.jpg (46KB, 327x400px) Image search:
[Google]
46KB, 327x400px
If you don't think linear perspective is important and "EWW TOO BORING" you're fucking lost, son.
What the fuck do you think FWAP and Successful Drawing are about? How to become a master butthole fingerer?
>>
>>2672637
You're wasting hours posting on /ic/ which gives zero gains.
What's the difference?
>>
It's just a basic easy thing to get beginners to understand form and practice technique.
There's nothing historically like it because back then there would be a guy over your shoulder forcing you to do cast studies with charcoal, and you wouldn't be able to complain about it being too hard.
Thread posts: 8
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2