Is it okay to draw lolicon? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Fr WDuKWtU4

>>2645887
Your rights end where my feelings begin.

>>2645887
loli is the most uninteresting subject

As long as the law of your country says so.

>>2645887
One minute in, and he's already acting like a retard who thinks it's normal to get caught for drugs, burglary, drunk driving and assault when you're a teenager. What a complete fucking scumbag.

>>2645887
>shadman
opinions discarded

>>2645887
Yes, yes it is. As he says it's fiction and in fiction every taboo imaginable can be broken.

>>2645887

>le edgelord defence
>never had sexual thoughts about minors
>spend all day drawing 11 yo girls getting fucked in every orifice possible

Oh gee shadman you got me convinced

>>2645913
Stay mad. Stay jelly.

>>2645917
I sure do wish I was a pedophile.

>>2645913
I mean, I understand your reasoning, but I fap to incest all the time, and I wouldn't be caught dead having sex with my family.

Supposedly the most common female sexual fantasy is about rape, yet I doubt that means they want to be raped.

>>2645953

They don't want to be raped per se, but they want the concept of being overpowered and dominated. If you frequently get turned on by the concept of hairless, flatchested prepubescent girls having sex with adults there is likely a tell there about your sexuality. I'm not against lolicon I just despise the ridiculous justifications and rationalizations the pedos engage in

>>2645980

Yeah. Which kind of rationalization would they need?

It's not like they want to fuck real kids. If you want to justify anything, chances are you're actually atracted to little girls.

File: 1469510285289.png (75KB, 256x256px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 256x256px

Draw what you want, its like lines dude.

>>2646005
If people who fap to dickgirls can convince themselves they are not gay, then people can convince themselves of anything.

>>2646005
Ugh, No. It's like saying furries want to fuck real anthro animals by fapping to it.

>tfw never heard about feminine dicks.

>>2645887
It's okay if no real life kids are being harmed. Still degenerate though.

>>2646005
>>2646006
gay is as gay does.

>>2646011

Sexuality isn't a binary either or thing, it exist on a gradient. Chances are a lot of furries have zoophilic tendencies. Same with lolicon/yaoi. You can have pedo/gay tendencies without being exclusively homosex or pedolicious.

File: 1425538747034.jpg (661KB, 1059x1500px) Image search: [Google]

661KB, 1059x1500px

>>2646005
Terrible analogy, Yaoi encompasses feminine attributes does it not? Unless you are turned on by hairy grisly hulk tier men you're gay.

>>2646015
pic related is not the least amount of gay.

>>2646030
Not gay*

>>2646005
You're implying faggots like all men on earth, as well as lolifags like every depiction of little girls, real or not.

And yeah, that's not true. 3d girls are gross.

>>2646005
Why do you even care so much

>>2645887
It's okay unless your shadman
because shadman is shit at it

>open the video
>chromatic aberration
STOP, FUCKING STOP

This video is cringy, I'm not very familiar with this artist, but from the looks of the characters hes drawing in the video, they don't look like lolis. Drawing teen looking characters, shortstacks, or characters who are designated as being "young" but representing them with mature bodily proportions (as western artists often do out of habit and lack of practice) is not loli at all.

I draw lolis, I have over 2k followers on pixiv as well. Personally I always found it very hypocritical to shun a certain subject matter while so many other ''degenerate'' subject matter already exist, the main argument they have is that lolicon is symbolic of unnatural desire which is why it is worse than others, by that logic bestiality, incest, pony porn etc also represent unnatural desires yet those are excepted in most places (tumbr). Theres commonly accepted artwork out there which depicts not only unnatural behavior but behavior which would be physically harmful in real life, yet that is also accepted as normal because it is fiction. All of this also applies to lolicon, lolicon, like anything else is fantasy. lolicon is a fantastical exaggeration of reality rather than a literal interpretation of reality, and it is possible to fetishize the exaggeration and have that be separate from the reality, many other fetishes do that. Fantasy does not equal desire, many women fantasize being raped, but would not want to actually be raped or hurt, and instead fantasize or use safe alternatives. The woman, and her boyfriend pretending to rape her understand that what they are doing is fantasy, the morality of the act is not an issue because they understand that no real trauma is happening and they understand the difference of safe fantasy and harsh reality. lolicon is really no different than that, it is harmless fantasy, just like any other drawn pornography.

File: 954f33c7320e6af4d76a57c73ba3bc53.png (1MB, 985x1260px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 985x1260px

>>2646005
>if guys fapping to drawn little girls aren't pedophiles, then are guys fapping to drawn yaoi not gay?

I never really thought about it like that. I know for a fact I ain't no irl pedo since someone linked /hebe/ here and I nope'd the fuck outta' there as soon as I saw what it was but...

>>2645899
>Not doing those things

Not gonna make it

>>2645887
>im not gay
>draw male characters getting penetrated balls deep by BBC
Yeah, whatever you say

>>2646141
he might be doing it for the money.

Artists like him and doxxy are whores who'll draw literally anything for patreonbux

>>2645887
i cant tell what country this fucker is from

hes speaking swedish but sounds like a third world shitskin from latin america?

>>2646159
swiss german. i remember him saying something about it on sleepycast

>>2646159
I think he mentioned Switzerland.

>>2646173
>>2646176
Swiss guy here, can confirm. I found out where he used to live, I feel very content in knowing that I could call up his mother at any time to tell her how terrible her son's rendering is.

>>2646298
He drew his mom naked for mother's day and supposedly also her getting fucked by a dog, his rendering is the least of her problems.

I'd pay to see you interview her on her son's career, though.
>mrs shad, here he has drawn a homeless blind little girl getting raped by a pack of dogs, what do you think he meant by this?
>do you think his tendency to draw females with large penises was influenced by you in any way?

>>2646448
Assuming what you're saying is true, that explains a lot.

File: 163500_theshadling_mother[1].jpg (328KB, 837x842px) Image search: [Google]

328KB, 837x842px

>>2646450
http://www.newgrounds.com/art/view/theshadling/mother

Never saw the alleged dog version, hence "supposedly".

>>2646011
I am a furry and I would totaly fuck a real anthro animal, hell yeah. Not an actual smelly animal.

File: 1459221190219.jpg (39KB, 600x375px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 600x375px

>>2645887

>>2646448
>he drew porn of Lyanna Mormont from Game Of Thrones
Despite the major flaws in his art I still like the guy and his degeneracy but drawing porn based on an actual child is fucked up

>>2646005
>guys fapping to drawn yaoi not gay?
I know you're being flippant, but I do that occasionally, still never wanted to fuck a real dude. I think there's a big difference between what we imagine and what we're actually comfortable doing. Lolicon makes me really uncomfortable and I can see why it's a contentious topic, but criminalising it is the wrong approach imo.

>>2645899
Not surprising since Shad is a fucking tool who can't improve even if he tried.

Wherever I posted my loli work, I get permabanned. It's not tolerated anywhere anymore.

>>2647053
Maybe draw sfw lolis that isn't blatantly sexual.

>>2647055
Where's the fun in that?

In my country its illegal. I think lolicon is disgusting but the fact that it is illegal means that art as a whole is not covered under freedom of speech.
As it stands now, it is up to the police to decide if a piece of art in your possession is "obscene" this gives them the power to throw you in jail on child porn charges for literally anything, I'm struggling to find the article now but last year a guy was put on the sex offenders registry for owning an oil painting of a cherub.
Unfortunately its a problem that will not be solved any time soon, its just impossible to argue against these laws without seeming like a pedophile so politicians wont touch it with a barge pole

>>2647205
Which country do you live in?

>>2647215
Ireland

>>2645887
>tfw shad is better than you
Fuck.

>>2646005
Yaoi is created for insecure girls who can't handle irl males.

>>2646005
So does that mean if someone jerks to cartoon women does that mean they wanna fuck real women?

>>2647205
New Zealand/Australia here, can relate.

At one point, a judge literally decided a picture of the Simpsons is real people.

>>2645887
It's okay, but, shotas >>>>>>> lolis

>>2647504
erm, yea

>>2646005
it's a retarded and unequivocal analogy. pedophila isn't a sexuality, just like BDSM isn't a sexuality. It's a fetish. If you like loli's but not shotas, it's because you're attracted to vaginas, or at least not penises.

People like loli's not because they are retarded children but because they are a fantasy depiction of tiny attractive and cute little women. It commonly incites the fantasy of protecting fragile innocent things and giving them happiness.

Real children in real life are disgusting. Just like a lot of fetishes, if acted out in reality, would be disgusting.That's why most loli and shota fags don't want anything to do with the real thing, they are nothing like the fantasy version at all.

>>2647750

Are those boys? Am I gay now?

>>2647767

>pedophiles don't want to have sex with children

wew lad

File: BOYS.jpg (812KB, 1075x1520px) Image search: [Google]

812KB, 1075x1520px

>>2647770
>Are those boys?
yes
>Am I gay now?
yes

>>2647772
Not him, but that isn't wrong, just like not everyone who has sex with children is a pedophile.

Pedophilia is a mental illness related to attraction to children, not the attraction itself.
If a child molester is diagnosed with pedophilia, he generally gets sent to a medical institution, not regular prison.

Yes.

>>2647205
This.

Making art a crime is a form of thought police and gives too much power to the government.

>>2647772
Some do, but not everyone who is into loli/shota is a pedo. It's a fetish separate from pedophilia but could be in addition to.

>>2647766
3dpd tho

>>2646005
fatansy =/= reality
thatd be like saying people into rape fantasies are rapists/rape victims

>>2647984
You are fucking stupid kid.

A rapist is defined as someone who has committed the act of rape.

A rape victim is defined as someone who has been raped.

A pedophile is defined as someone sexually attracted to children

You know, the kind of people that jerk off to images of children or "proportionately child like beings that just happen to be 1000+ years old for liability purposes".

>>2647991
except many are not into fucking actual kids, as in they arent sexually attracted to kids, so by definition not pedos

>>2646005
It's not gay unless the balls touch.

>>2647991
>A pedophile is defined as someone sexually attracted to children
Yes, to real children. If I recall correctly that's a part of the definition.

>>2646005
It's pedophilia if people get off to the character's age.
It's NOT pedophilia if they get off to how the character's cute, small, innocent or the body type that goes with loli shit.
>are guys fapping to drawn yaoi not gay?
It IS gay if the characters are bara or obviously men.
It's not really gay if the guy being fucked is drawn as a girl who happens to have a dick, they're probably getting off to the female features, the dick is just kinda there.
Other shit that isn't really gay, but some might think it is would be, is like futa or dudes magically becoming girls. As long as the girl is getting fucked, it's fine.

>>2648132
>It's not really gay if the guy being fucked is drawn as a girl who happens to have a dick, they're probably getting off to the female features, the dick is just kinda there.

Stop deluding yourself anon, you're gay.

>>2647216
hope the garda don't knock on your door lad

t. your best buds on the other side of the irish sea

>>2645887

>Fap to loli porn
>Fap to MILF porn
>Fap to shota
>Fap to skinny petite girls
>Fap to BBW girls
>Fap to muscle girls

I don't know what this says about me.

>>2648187
You don't have a gf

>>2648187

It says you're a bisexual, non exclusive pedophile.

>>2648189
[spoiler]I do tho[/spoiler]
[spoiler]I know she'd leave me if she ever saw all the porn that I looked at[/spoiler]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Owa5KcQ9Mxc

>>2647835
Yep. I just don't find it good to start drawing (heh) lines in the sand as to what's okay and what's not when it comes to expression in art. I don't get how someone will want to look at comics of a little blind girl being fucked by a pack of dogs but I'm not gonna forbid them to draw it in the first place, they're literally just lines.

Someone who draws little kids getting fucked and someone who films/watches real little kids in real situations that make sick people lots of money are very different. Are we gonna start calling artists who draw violence murderers too? It's pretty ridiculous.

>>2648132
>It's NOT pedophilia if they get off to how the character's cute, small, innocent or the body type that goes with loli shit.

What kind of retarded pedo logic is this?

>molest an 8 year old girl
>"but judge, I wasn't attracted to her for her age I was attracted to her cute little body and her innocence. Clearly not a pedophile, you see?"

sure
if you're not hurting any irl people then why the fuck not?

also there's a difference between drawn people and actual people.
with drawn people you can't do anything with them except see, but you can use all 5 senses with irl people.

I known some lolifag friends and all of them aren't into irl kiddies at all. One joked because they don't have huge-ass anime eyes, but that's pretty much the main reason why most lolicons aren't automatically pedos.

And if somehow being attracted to animu meant you were a loli, I would much rather have some guy masturbating to a picture than if they were to masturbate behind a tree near some elementary school or flat-out rape kids.

I'm not really justifying or defending myself (not really a loli fan) just answering OP's question

>>2648350
>Denial

File: 250px-Grand_Theft_Auto_IV_cover.jpg (35KB, 250x313px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 250x313px

>people are still having the "reality vs fiction" argument on the internet 8 years later

File: 1458068350804.png (108KB, 464x290px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 464x290px

>>2648497
They are just trolls or shithead moralfags. >>2648350 This and only this is the right answer. I'd rightfully send every fucker in this thread to death row for seriously thinking a faggot jacking off to a pointless picture is more important then defending real life children from being raped by fuckers that does sexually like little kids. Anime aren't children. It isn't real people. Only real rapists are wrong, not artist drawing anime shit that doesn't effect actual kids.
I don't give a shit about some faggot fapping to images, I care about that other faggot about to rape that poor defenseless child. Any dumbass that thinks the former is actually more important than the latter, is fucked up in the mind and needs to get purged from history; >>2647991 >>2648340 >>2648354

>>2649574
It's emblematic though and that's the problem. It symbolizes, celebrates, the raping, murdering, and oppression of children.

Lying doesn't hurt anyone but it's still considered wrong. Loli artists are essentially liars. The make up some pseudo like complex reasoning to call it what it's not--kiddie diddling. Hypocrite.

>>2650346
this is the stupidest thing i've read yet on this board

>>2650346
>It's emblematic though and that's the problem. It symbolizes, celebrates X of Y
You're right, let's ban everything.

>>2650346
>The make up some pseudo like complex reasoning to call it what it's not--kiddie diddling. Hypocrite.
>"it's not real"
>pseudo like complex reasoning
>"literally never happened"
>pseudo like complex reasoning

>>2650346
>yfw there are educated adults in this world and in government that actually think this way

le butthurt thread

>>2645887
Eh, I like Shadman as a person and I don't think what he does constitutes any real offense.

>muh thought crime

But hey, whatever. I can't tell him what not to draw.

>>2646005
I fap to yuri and I'm pretty sure I'm not a lesbian

Its not even just about lolicon man, i think that its to be expected that people who don't care at all about art would be censorship happy about things that makes them unconformable,
but when i actually see artists especially porn artists advocate censorship it really makes me worried and sad, those people are making a living by using freedom of expression and
here they are advocating the one thing that goes against their whole existence.

In south Korea any kind of drawn porn is illegal and some months back there was a big crackdown on pixiv and quite a few Korean porn artists went to jail and those who didn't quit
and went into hiding, do you think that the public defend those artists? no the average citizen just thinks that they are perverts who contribute nothing to society and corrupt the youth and
shit, censorship is a very dangers thing, when people grow up into censorship they take it for granted, and no one goes against it ever, see Japan, because its the law and to the average
person if its the law then it must be right because "there is a reason that's illegal"

>>2648197
>You people wouldn't believe the things that i've seen

>>2646030
hahahahaha
thats super gay dude

>>2645887
I enjoy it once in a while
Shadman isn't that good though.
Funkuhr has some amazing work.

>>2650346
As a young adult who was diddled for real as a small kid and struggles with the subconscious effect on my mind everyday- you can go fuck yourself, with something big preferably, and then congratulate yourself on Twitter for being such an upstanding moral citizen like I'm sure you do everyday.

Dumbass.

>>2650399
>the average citizen just thinks that they are perverts who contribute nothing to society and corrupt the youth and
>shit
They're right you know, porn is degenerate.

>>2645887

>>>/a/146166757

At least /a/ has come to terms with the fact that they're lolicons.

>>2648132
The entire appeal behind traps is that they're guys in skirts, of course it's gay.
That being said, fapping to 2d traps/guys doesn't make you gay because they're nor real.
2d isn't anything like 3d.

>>2647776
>Pedophilia is a mental illness

ffs I can't wait till society progresses to the point where pedophobia is judged as abhorent as racism, homophobia, transphobia etc.

File: Mina.Tepes.full.1057195.jpg (1MB, 1500x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1500x1200px

Don't worry anons. You are not pedophiles if you fap to her because she's 400+ years old.

It's pathetic how pedophiles defend lolicon with the excuse that the drawings are not real people.

Who says they are? Name one person that has said that? Name one. I guarantee you whom ever you point to that wasn't what they said or implied. And you perverts know this.

It's very simple, loli celebrates pedophilia. And that is what makes it morally wrong. Loli is an attitude that poisons society. Why should society have to wait for any you perverts to act on your pedo-urges just so they can say that loli is wrong?

A person is innocent until proven guilty, but an idea is guilty until proven innocent. And the idea of loli is as guilty as the pedophile.

>>2651231
nice strawman

>>2651231

>le slip slop

>>2651002
>That being said, fapping to 2d traps/guys doesn't make you gay because they're nor real.

You're right fapping to cartoon depictions of homosexual acts doesn't make you gay.

It just make you loser who is too pathetic to acknowledge their own homosexual fantasies. In other words it means you're such a chicken-shit about gay people that you use gay-cartoons to deal with your own frustrations.

But you're not gay, so that makes it okay.

>>2651241
>>2651246

What's wrong pedo-anons? Too afraid to face up to the moral issue at stake here or do you need more time to come up with something?

It's bad enough you perverts have such low standards in art, but celebrating this kind of shit just makes you people a lot more tasteless.

I'm just gonna thow this out there: most guys are attracted to teen girls (12+) and the only reason they dont act on their attraction is because it's illegal, of course some of them also think it's immoral but that's even a smaller number of guys.

>inb4 white knights
>ugh yuck I could never be attracted to a younger girl, we would have nothing in common

File: 1409534211161.jpg (981KB, 1536x2178px) Image search: [Google]

981KB, 1536x2178px

>>2651250
Yeah dude, because i can go down to my local bar and find a trap just like this, but the only reason i don't is because i am hiding my sexuality, not
that the darwings that i masturabe to are so stylized that they hardly represent reality at all at this point.
So far i've never met a male in real life or on the itnernet that gets me hard and i masturabate to 2D traps a lot, it's just not the same.
Just like how finding one metal song that you like don't make you a metalhead finding a very specific very altered variation of a fetish doesn't brand your sexuality.

>>2651269
If you're actively seeking penis when there's other options available you're on the spectrum, bruh.

>>2651261
In europe the age of consent is 15 and below in most countries, in places like france you'll see 25 and older man dating
15-16 year old schoolgirls and no one bats an eye, the majority of people just shape their morals in the laws that they grow up in
The funny thing is, if you fuck a 15 year old in france you are tots good with the law, but if you draw a non existent 15 or even 17 year old having sex which is a legal act you are off to jail.
Thankfully europe doesn't have any blanket laws and most of the countries are safe and i can draw whatever i want in peace.

>>2651278
And i never find it because it doesn't exist, real people are real people men i don't know how else to explain it to you,
the 3DPD is not just a meme for everyone.

>>2651269
1. No one gives a shit about your pathetic life or what you do with it.

2. The reasons you stop yourself from living out whatever pedo-rape fantasy you have planned are your reasons alone.

3. So you think your 2d husbando is the bestest thing? So what?

Basically all I'm reading from you is that you're too pathetic to even want to engage with the real world. Propbably because you know they won't except your pedo-rape fantasies. Oh, I'm sure you have had all the opportunities in the world but said no. You weren't saying no from some moral high ground. You said no because you're too much of coward.

File: 1469108735855.jpg (36KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 640x480px

>>2651278
>doesn't indulge all of the options in make believe chinese drawings

>>2651293
>Oh, I'm sure you have had all the opportunities in the world but said no.
But i didn't that was my whole point, what i truly enjoy simply does not exist as a real person, not in any age not in any gender.

>>2651284
The mental gymnastics you're attempting to justify this man-part preference aren't fooling anybody. Just embrace it.

>>2651284
Why do you keep fighting it? Go out a rape a kid. How else would you know you don't like the real thing? You haven't really tried it. You don't know shit. Go diddy a kiddy and stfu.

>>2651306
How else would you know you don't like the real thing?
Because i look at it and it doesn't look like my drawings, the aesthetic that gets my dick going is not in any way presented anywhere on real people, also where did the pedo thing started? i was talking about
traps, i live in europe i could fuck a shitty 15 year old trap legally, that's not the point.

>>2651297
>But i didn't that was my whole point
You started out about being able to pick up underage trannies at a local bar but you don't. Your whole point is that you're too much of a pussy for the real thing and so you keep making excuses.

>>2651311
>What is sarcasm?
>Yeah dude, because i can go down to my local bar and find a trap just like this (meaning the drawing i posted)
Are you autistic?

>>2651310
So you don't draw from life, and you only get hard for badly drawn shota. Okay.

Yeah, you people are fucked up.

>>2651320
Never said i am normal friend.

>>2651318
>autistic

Said the guy who can only get it up to 2d traps.

whatever "bruh"

>>2651325
so that's a yes

>>2651324
And you never said you're good at drawing either.

File: f60174080073e2cb68995835011cea4b.jpg (235KB, 805x1000px) Image search: [Google]

235KB, 805x1000px

>>2651325
Not just traps, my tastes are literally everywhere, hairy armpits, scat, etc
It's just that real life seems boring to me, i tried in the past from peer pressure by good friends but i gave up.

>>2651326
Yes, you are autistic. That's what the post means.

>>2651332
>my tastes are literally everywhere

No you're contradicting yourself.

>>2651336
Well except 3D if that's what you mean, but in 2D i like almost every fetish in existence.

>>2651231
you describe a strawman argument in your first sentence but then go on to construct your own
you're not very good at this logic thing

this thread is funny because most of the people who enjoy loli are girls, esp young girls

99% of them are harmless

>>2645887
>we have to protect the childrenz because people who are attracted to stylized fantasy versions of them will go out in public and HURT THEM

>we have to protect women because people who are attracted to them will go out in public and HURT THEM

most of you are no better than fucking feminazis i swear

>>2651340
bitch you jerk off to 2d strawmen.

>>2651345
That reminds me, a lot of the more popular lolicon artists are woman, like henreader and the woman who did kodomo no jikan and the other one that did lotte no omocha.

>>2651353
>kodomo no jikan
I loved that one

what a edgy fucktard

>>2651345
this, go on tumblr for proof.

>>2645887
>Is it okay to draw lolicon?
Is it okay to draw gore?
Is it okay to draw rape?
Then?

I would do it for a living if I could.

>>2651459
They're not real blah blah. You don't understand blah blah. I'm no into real blah blah.

>>2651481
Are you saying it isn't ok to draw gore or rape, or what?

File: 1462887872434.png (128KB, 427x315px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 427x315px

>>2651231
Christ who the fuck cares?
Why are people like you breathing on this Earth SERIOUSLY caring more about some faggot over some real life child being raped? Why? Fucking WHY?
This "thought police" thing is the plague of 2010s, it's fucking pathetic. Why do so many people care about the rapist, and not the rape VICIM? No one fucking talks about that with people like you, you just want people to pay because they drew/look at something you don't like, instead of locking up fucked up molesters that raped a defenseless child.
God I hope you people die in cold blood at this point, SJWs tier shitheads are the worst thing to happen, even over Hitler at this point.

>>2651459
It's ok to draw anything you want

>>2651345
This

Femanon here with tmi

>severely tokophobic to the point that discussion of the subject is nauseating
>one of my biggest, favorite kinks is impregnation

>arachnophobic as hell
>most i've ever been turned on was shit tier edgy story about giant spiders with massive dicks raping people to death

>molested as a child, really hate being around kids because i find them annoying
>love drawing lolicon

okay maybe I'm an extreme case but the point I'm trying to make is that art = fiction = fantasy = expression. It's a means of experiencing something with complete control over the situation. you draw the picture, read the story, watch the movie, and when you're done, nothing in the real world has changed.

the argument against lolicon is that it encourages pedophilia. if drawing and viewing lolicon were an offense punishable by death and no one ever drew it, there would still be child molesters. there have always been pedos and there always will be, regardless of what some obscure fuckwit on the internet doodles.

>>2651880
All of your green text read like cause and effect

>>2651880
Stfu tranny. Just because you say you're girl doesn't make your peewee disappear.

File: memes.png (810KB, 1286x3969px) Image search: [Google]

810KB, 1286x3969px

is this the right thread

>>2651950
ur mum makes my peewee disappear

>>2651231

It's pathetic how gamers defend violent video games with the excuse that the characters are not real people.

Who says they are? Name one person that has said that? Name one. I guarantee you whom ever you point to that wasn't what they said or implied. And you psychos know this.

It's very simple, violent games celebrates murder. And that is what makes it morally wrong. Video games are attitudes that poisons society. Why should society have to wait for any you killers to act on your murder-urges just so they can say that violent games are wrong?

A person is innocent until proven guilty, but an idea is guilty until proven innocent. And the idea of video game violence is as guilty as the serial killer.

>>2651269
I guess it's kinda like how furries would fuck anthromorphized animals, but not actual animals.

File: 1449545831471s.jpg (5KB, 125x125px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 125x125px

>>2645899
It IS common. Not that normal is always a good thing. I, personally have never been in trouble with the law, but both my brother and sister have been, along with my mother, father, and stepfather. Law breaking is normal, but not a good thing. Get off your high horse, anon.

Of course
>I love gay art and futa
>but I'm not gay, though, I swear!

>>2655266
They're probably not gay if they can also get off to women

They're bisexual

What happened to shad?

He used to be so great on sleepycast but now he just acts like a fucking weirdo faggot all the time

It's one of the reasons i hate interacting with other porn artists because they make normal conversations cringy

>I'm a ssssssssslipery ssssssssnake
>Drawing sssssssssexy girlssssss

Sssssomeone put this sssssssad man out of his misery

>>2652095
Great.

#REKT

>>2651250
There are people that can distinguish between a depiction of gay people/underage people/murder and the real subject.

Smart people.

That's the same as thinking that if you like GTA, it will make you/ you're already a sociopath murderer.

And wich kind of people thinks like that?

>>2655657
That's why I rarely interact with "fans", and generally keep my comments brief when I post art on /ic/. I don't want to associate my personal life with my art.

And yeah, fans and commissioners can be creepy motherfuckers.

>>2652095
anti-loli faggots completely BTFO

>>2647219
No fucking way man. Shad is, has been and will always be shit, there's no way you're anything but beginner tier if you're worse. You started drawing recently?

>>2647770
>>2647773
But it's not gay if they look like girls, just look how girly those boys are.

>>2647773
Is there a translated version? I can only find moon runes

>>2648187
Novelty addict perhaps?

>>2650346
>Lying doesn't hurt anyone but it's still considered wrong.

If this is what you believe Im tapping out. Good luck with this thread anons

Godspeed

>>2656841
Did lie hurt you anon? You wanna cry about it?

File: 400x400.jpg (21KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 400x400px

>>2651231
>morally
>wrong

>>2647767
>tiny attractive and cute little women.

In kindergarten uniforms with those red backpacks that grade schoolers carry? Little women, huh?

>>2651231

I don't give a shit if people want to shit on some guy for drawing little girls having sex. It's normal for it to be socially unacceptable, no one gives a shit about that. He just shouldn't be legally persecuted for his ideas.

>>2657552
This.

I don't understand why this is so hard for some people to understand. I also don't get why
degenerate pedos and their apologist have to come up with so many excuses ("I don't see lolis as young girls, just flat/petite/tiny women") in order to justify their fetish.

I think lolicon and shotacon (even straight) are disgusting, just like the rest of normal society. But I don't think anyone drawing it should be jailed for it. Fined if it gets discovered, sure. Maybe even put on the sex offender registry, but not thrown in the slammer over drawings.

Also are these shit taste fetishist forgetting that it's totally possible for a lolicon to actually be a full on pedo as well?

File: retarded.jpg (54KB, 960x783px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 960x783px

>>2651231
>an idea is guilty until proven innocent
Your main argument isn't even an argument

>>2657552
>He just shouldn't be legally persecuted for his ideas.

>>2657557
>this
>I don't think anyone drawing it should be jailed for it. Fined if it gets discovered, sure. Maybe even put on the sex offender registry

nigga are u retarded

>>2657552
>He just shouldn't be legally persecuted for his ideas.
Then you should have no problems with sjws or feminism pushing thier ideas

>>2657698
It called skepticism, you fucking idiot.

>>2657557
>Fined if it gets discovered, sure
>being fined over a drawing

I hate pedos as much as the next person, but nigga, this is some 1984-tier shit

>>2646157
this
I draw all kinds of shit too but my personal interest is as vanilla as vanilla goes
As long as there are people willing to pay, I'm willing to draw

>>2657548

They are cosplaying.

>>2645887
nothing in this world should be off limits from drawing.
You're not hurting anyone, what's the big deal

>>2657717
It's called being a faggot
also it imply s you know what the people who draw lolicon think.

That's some pretty shitty sjw tactics their bucko.

It's fine, it just means you're a pedophile.

>>2646120
I agree with you

normies will never understand

the future will have no freedom of expression, because they cry in favor of censorship of anything that hurts their feelings