I made this for a spa in my town haven't send it yet.

>>2548707
>muh trypophobia

Go to /gd/. This is clearly a photo.

Also, that's not remotely how water looks (either the droplets or the actual pool of water), that wood paneling is artificial as fuck, and it doesn't look very good for anything other than a split second glance.

Then again, it's an advertisement, so I guess needing to look good is debatable...

>>2548719
Droplets? I thought she was covered in small diamonds, and I'm not shitting you.

I would be very much ashamed of calling something like this mine, to be honest.

Why is she bedazzled?

>>2548748

I know that's what it looks like, but if you zoom in really closely, you can tell that it's generic clip art water droplets.

Maybe it's easier to do that on mobile or something, but...eh.

>>2548765
there's no "eh" about it. It looks like shit. Have some god damned standards.

>>2548719
doesn't matter where he goes

anywhere will call it shit

i would just uninstall photoshop in shame

Why is she sunlit when it's nighttime behind her?

>>2548768

I'm referring to whether it's easier to zoom in on mobile or not, dumbass.

I have called this bad already, Jeebus.

>>2548707
She looks diseased

>>2548707

Spas are typically marketed as a place primarily for women where they can go and be pampered in a soothing and relaxing atmosphere. This looks like a ad for a strip club or a whorehouse aimed at men. Women will HATE this.

>>2548775

Yes and no. It's clearly a photomanip, so...it's normally /gd/ material.

You're right about it being shit wherever OP goes.

File: 8da134f026126aba25fc6515ffffec5b.jpg (18KB, 236x269px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 236x269px

>>2548707
>What do you think?

>>2548948
Fuck you

>>2548948
Christ. This shit doesn't bother me to the point of thinking I have any such phobia, but this shit still bothers the fuck outta me.

Fuck those tiny plants, yo

>>2548707
This looks fucking awful, OP.