What do you think of Ken Ham and his organisation's interpretations

>>953318
He's a quack. Creationism is literally as retarded as Scientology.

>inb4 creationists flock to this thread to spam their bullshit

Absolutely heretical.

Is he the one who came up with the "god powered hyper evolution" in that one creationist museum to explain how animal life could have diversified so quickly after leaving the ark?

File: St. Augustine of Hippo.jpg (71KB, 409x502px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 409x502px

He's wrong

Arrogant cretin or clever con man.

File: god said it.jpg (17KB, 328x250px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 328x250px

>>953318

>Unwilling to accept that their interpretation of the bible in incorrect.

>Subordinates reason to dogma, non-negotiably.

Their ideology requires that they prohibit open-mindedness; thus, not worth debating, except as a psychological experiment.

>>953318
>I watched his debate with bill nye. He had a well made slide show with some hilarious arguments.

File: Jack Chick.gif (28KB, 468x240px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 468x240px

Pelagianism at its finest.

I see Ken Ham's whole theology as the antithesis to the reformed ministry and its underlying message is salvation comes from believing philosophical assertions and behaving morally, which is completely man-centered.