Let's be honest, /his/, would anything CLOSE to Jurassic

>>>/sci/

sage

There are literally 4 of them already made

>>904973
Not really. We're centuries away from that sort of mastery over genetics and cloning.

>>904978
>dinosaurs
>not history related
>announcing sage as well

Retard.

This isn't a thread for the history board my friend

>>904973

In the few instances where they found any dinosaur DNA the vast majority of it had been degraded, or it later turned out that what they thought was dino DNA was actually contamination (a less charitable observer might call this research misconduct.) But no, DNA is not stable over hundreds of millions of years. Why do you think biologists keep DNA in freezers? DNA, in water, at room temperature, will already degrade within a few months. Imagine what a few dozen million years in rough conditions would do.

>>904973
>take emus, pidgeons and ostrichs
>engineer their genome to highlight archaic traits such as claws, teeth, tail
>?????
Tada!"