Recently I was bored and wanted to watch a documentary on England.

>>867106
>thread
Fuck me I need to go to sleep.

bumpidy

"China: A Century of Revolution" is pretty comfy

>>868192
Ah yes and it's even on PtP.
Thanks mate! Comfy is what I am looking for I guess.

Is he right about the Anglo-Saxon kingdom being the most advanced state in Europe before the n̶o̶r̶m̶i̶e̶s̶ normans ruined everything?

>>868530
He doesn't say they ruined everything but they didn't add anything to it.

>>867106
Not strictly England-related, but I've been thoroughly enjoying Kenneth Clark's Civilization series recently.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpPNbI6GcxI&list=PLt3Pke412qVciCdn0jVjBquUNS4ClEVYa

>>869602
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpPNbI6GcxI&list=PLt3Pke412qVciCdn0jVjBquUNS4ClEVYa
Yepp, that's a good one but I watched it already. Also the documentaries don't have to be England related. Sorry for the confusion.

>>867106

What is this documentary m8?

File: BBC Civilisation.jpg (122KB, 460x288px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 460x288px

BBC's Civilisation obviously, in case you don't know it.

>>871951
lel hadn't seen the previous posts, never mind.

>look up David Starkey
>working class
>English nationalist
>Quaker
>rabidly anti-Catholic
>homosexual

This is going to be one of those "England pure strong 14/88 Anglo-Saxon Germanic, not a drop of filthy French mud blood" kind of things, isn't it.

>>871981
No it isn't and your ad hominems are weak.

>>871985
I listed his opinions and beliefs and made a guess that his documentary would probably reflect them. I don't think you know what an ad hominem is.

>>871991
>working class
>homosexual
>opinions and beliefs

>>871981
Shit with that kind of bias wouldn't even get funding or be released over here.

>>867106

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNpXwpYAahg

OP, I have to warn you, it is against the law in many countries to invoke David Starkey's name without posting this video in the same topic

File: 1457705108270.jpg (74KB, 480x383px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 480x383px

>>872182
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNpXwpYAahg
Sorry I am too busy to watch a video in shit quality from some who unironically uses the term "SJW" in the title. Also I did not invoke his name.