your opinion on this youtube channel is the information reliable?

>>494884
Duck Duck Go

>>494884
my wife's son really loves this channel

>>495024
If you don't stop him he's going to grow up into a cůck

>>495031
>>/pol/
Dan Green is ok desu, but he obviously has a hard on for Ghenghis khan.

It is ok for what it is: a collection of small, factoids to help teenagers learn things that they would find too boring to wiki up, spiced with the bad jokes and biased opinions of the author

That said, he lacks sources for most of his information, which makes him worthless for any academic class. Also, skip all videos where he tries to explain HOWs, since those tend to be loaded with opinions formed from the already mentioned unknown sources.

>>494884
>your opinion on this youtube channel
trash
>is the information reliable?
fuck no, did you even watch it?
I bet you're just looking for (You)s

>>495043
>not having a hard on for Genghis Khan

simply popular history

Quite shit. Read a book.

>>496388
recommend me

>>495115
How is it no reliable it uses mainly primary sources?

>>496392
What are your interests?

>>496396
Here's your free reply.
First, please improve your English if you are going to attempt to speak it.
Second, please provide proof that it uses primary sources, and that it cites said sources.