Is there a single philosophy which isn't ultimately

Only religion, if you consider that philosophy.

Scientism..... But there is a lot of bias in science, especially social science

File: 1441678556375.gif (856KB, 175x200px) Image search: [Google]

856KB, 175x200px

Why do /pol/ and /his/ discredit emotions? It almost seems like they're almost in denial of having them, despite the fact that emotions regulate and filter what information comes before the persons "logic" and "reason" kicks in.

I think these people associate themselves with the ideas in their minds, which are not their own. I think they're at least a tiny bit inauthentic.

>>494414
Science isn't based in emotion? LOL

>>494555
>I think they're at least a tiny bit inauthentic.
Nice try, Sartre.

>>494414
lel

Ask me how I know you haven't studied any philosophy

>>494555
Emotions often obscure truth

>>494570
Well science is sort of based on it, because you can't use science to prove scientific truths, science presupposes science and mathematics

>>494382
analytical philosophy

>>494598

You think Sartre was the only existentialist?

>>494598

>Emotions often obscure truth

And? I it wont necessarily make you more or less happy, or live with more or less purpose.

>>494702

>You think Sartre was the only existentialist?

was meant for >>494571

metaphysics/ontology
phil of math/logic
phil sci
phil history
phil language
epistem

etc etc

>>494382

YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT PHILOSOPHY IS, OR IN WHAT IT CONSISTS.

File: Vilfredo-Pareto-Quotes-2.jpg (130KB, 586x403px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 586x403px

Not really, desu senpai

>>494382
What's a MOOT?

>>494598

So do 'facts'.

>>495299
A miserable pile of girl wanting.

>>494742

Thank you, REI. Glad to see you.

Opie, you are, as always, a faggot.