If a faulty premise always leads to faulty conclusions, how far

>>387143
>meditation be the baseline for a new kind of science
Wut.jpg
>faulty premise necessarily leads to faulty conclusions
Not necessarily. You can arrive at the correct conclusion from a faulty premise. You learn that in the logic class.

>>387143
>Not necessarily. You can arrive at the correct conclusion from a faulty premise. You learn that in the logic class.

Prove it.

>>387184
Sure.
>all tigers are fish (false premise)
>no fish have scales (false premise)
Therefore
>no tigers have scales (correct conclusion)

>>387252
I'm too stupid to argue with that. Is he correct?

>>387264
http://academic.csuohio.edu/polen/LC9_Help/1/14ftv.htm
Yes.

>>387291
>>387252
Does this still hold true for math?

>>387321
Yes. You could miscalculate in several places and still arrive at the correct answer.

>>387339
I can't put my finger on what's supposed to be wrong but something doesn't sit with me right. Do you always need to errors to cancel eachother out?

>>387321
>>387370
Yes. Having said that, it's also true that if you have a complete and consistent logical framework, if you then include at least one single false premise, then you can now reach any conclusion whatsoever, true or false.

>>387616
I wish they hadn't canceled the logic course two years before I went to uni.