ITT we post historys greatest leaders Pic related, historys

File: n1x59g0o2ysxj8np3qw7.jpg (44KB, 760x878px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 760x878px

As long as we are lying about shit.

Sulla

>>378909
Wow, you've learned something yesterday. Are you going to improve these shitty OPs as we point out the obvious mistakes, you fucking kid?

If you're talking great leaders I think you have to ask the question. "If this person wasn't in power? Would someone else have taken their place to the same effect?"

I think the answer to that with Hitler is yes. Therefore I think he was just a product of his times, not much more than it.

Now somebody like Bismarck or Alexander the Great, or Genghis Khan would have all been viable choices.

No way to judge objectively though.

>>378909
>does nothing of importance sans a war they lost
>good leader

>>383146
This is sort of a meme suggestion.

Intelligence is an intrinsic good that you can hold in your hand, it is physical matter that you own.

A generic rifleman of the era would probably be a better chancelor than Alexander the great because he spent 20 years fighting against enemies that didn't strafe run trade routes or use seige equipment and would have habits created from such.

File: fairy.gif (24KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 400x300px

>>383025
>a literal fairy

No wonder Tomyris fucking keked him.

>>378909

>Turns Germany from a humiliated postwar whipping boy into a superpower
>Pisses it all away out of arrogance and turns Germany back into a postwar whipping boy

Eh, he breaks even I guess.

>>384813
>race
What is that

>>383175
>never proven