Are countries, nation-states, and other geo-political divisions

ISIS, EU, USA, Russia are multiethnic

eu
nato
un
opec
asean

is there a powerful entity thats not multi-ethnic?

>>356533
China.

>inb4 the 9% of their population that isn't Han

>>356533
>>356528
So are China, India, Indonesia, the Philippines, Brazil and most big african countries.

>>356534
u rite u rite

but thats because theyre so goddamn efficient and theres so many of them

>>356534
only 30% of the population are han senpai

>>356540
None of those are relevant on the world stage except for china, compared to the other things mentioned

>>356533
None of those exept Nato is an empire in the traditional sense. most of them are just economic unions between countries that share the same interest.

>>356533
Aren't those more like leagues than empires?

>>356196
Imperialism is out of vogue in the developed world. The most you can hope for is a stealth neoliberal pseudo-empire like America.

Literally /pol/

>>358153
Nato isn't an empire in the traditional sense. It's just an alliance.

>>358564
>/pol/
>Multi-ethnic
Fearmonger please leave

>>356553
Brazil and Indonesia are rising fast...or Brazil was until their terrible leader plunged them into a depression.

>>356196
I think communication and transportation became so widespread that a western multi-ethnic empire isn't possible.

Russia and China can do it because they are huge and poorer than the US or Europe.

>>358153
>NATO is an empire

Suka blyad pidor

>>358581
/pol/ is multi-ethnic

>go to /pol/
>Americans, Jews, various Euros, Asians, Mexicans, Brazilians everywhere