sup /his/ I'm writing a research paper for my religion/anthropology

I'll bump once and then move on if nobody replies, it's not a really common religion I get it

>>348034
its also pretty late, maybe try again in around 8 hours

Here's a bump.
Hopefully someone knows.

>>349954
No one knows anything about bahai

>>349959
How did they write a wikipedia about it then, retard

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bah%C3%A1%27%C3%AD_Faith

If you study the humanities at uni do they care about how good your style is or do they just care purely about the content? I don't want creative writing feedback but if I was doing academic work I'd at least want it to be stylish instead of dry, e.g. I would use Schopenhauer or La Rochefoucauld as rolemodels.

Do lecturers give you feedback on aesthetic style?

>>349966
On 4chan you fucking turnip

>>349984
Your style is important only to the degree that it structures your argument.

Personal flair in your essays will help you come across and will make your essay interesting, so long as you do not confuse the quality of your argument with your suspense-thrilling prose.

Can you give an example tbqh?

>>350017
An example paragraph or examples of good and bad prose writers?

File: 1440260073708.jpg (47KB, 389x377px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 389x377px

>>349984
>tfw can't help but write like Kant

>>350029
An example paragraph of your own writing.

>>350038
My condolences. Maybe study Hegel's prose so that you can go even further down that tunnel, becoming so shit at writing that people can't tell and think you're even smarter than you already appear?

>>350043
I haven't been in school for years. My high school work wouldn't be an example of my potential now, and if I was to write something at this present moment it would be unplanned and out of practise.

>>350087
Keep writing like you are now, and I'm sure you'll have no problem.

>>350087
>>>/r/positivism

>>350105
Is this genuine praise? My posts here are totally improvised I don't take long to reflect on them or edit them before posting. I do think I have a good base level of clarity, modesty, and perception tho.

>Theres one god
>God reveals his nature to humans via prophets spread throughout history (Jesus, Krishna, Muhammad, etc.)
>Unity of Religion
>Unity of Language (auxiliary language)
>Unity of the world

Bout as barebones, but its a start

>>350116
I'm not a positivist at all though, they have even worse prose than Hegel. At least he was inspired. Positivists just try to reduce, popularise, mechanise, pragmatise, everyman-ise, anything (not everything) they touch.

Don't have to be one to realise Hegel can't write well. If Schopenhauer gave an honest account of anything Hegel, it was style. In content they had different concerns so it's less on-the-ball. You seem to think I dismiss his content like the positivists do, it's two different critiques though.