Would stalin have dropped a nuke on the germans in january 1945 if he could?
Would Italy have dropped nukes on Germany if he could?
>>3382741
doubt it
what's the point in ruling over an irradiated shithole?
better to let your hordes of slavs and central asians rape their women and kill their men in a way you assume total control
idk man let me ask him
Yo, stalin!
*creek* *step step step* "Yeah? What's up homie?"
Yo, stalin bruh, would you have nuked the germans in january 1945 my dude?
*creek smile* haha hitler you're so silly. of course I wouldn't
Me? Hitler? *grows a mustache* *the sides fall off*
Ummm
*smiles* Sorry buddy, but I was only joking
*slips his hand into his shirt pocket and pulls out a small atom bomb*
Oh shit my nigga stalin wildin! *ducks and pulls out a gun*
Haha fuck you Hitler! *throws the atom bomb*
Fuck *takes a shot the atom the bomb, little does hitler know you can't blow up a bomb like that with bullets*
*hitler explodes*
Honestly I think Stalin would have done it because the germans were his enemies and he hated them because hitler called them jewish brothers.
>>3382813
>Implying people knew about long term radioactivity effects back then.
Go check out "Document 72", concerning some American plans to use the a-bomb. When going over tactical usage, for instance to break up Japanese beach defense, they thought it would be safe to send their own troops in a day afterwards with no special precautions.
>>3382905
Kekko
>>3382741
No, by January 1945 they were going to take Berlin anyway. It would be much more useful to use it to get more out of the western allies post war.
>>3382741
Of course no, Stalin isn't an insane murderer like Hitler, he always killed to bring order not to unleash chaos
>tfw Germany surrendered too early
>tfw they weren't still alive and kicking by August 1945
>tfw we never got to glass Nuremberg and Hamburg
>>3382852
/his/, everybody