How can anyone ever admire him or think he was a good general after his monstrous fuck-up at Gettysburg and failure to even having a strategy during the war?
>>3379910
>won more battles than he lost
>was very succesful in the Mexican-American war
Hmm, gee, I wonder OP.
>b-but he lost in the end!
So did Napoleon.
>>3379924
I'm not sure I follow. Something to do with origami? Please elaborate.
All Grant did was playing the numbers game and keep driving Lee south. It doesn't take a genius to realize that the North had more men and resources than the South.
But what do I know, my ancestors were still in Dutch East Indies back then.
>>3379910
>He did this stupid thing
>Let's forget everything else he did and focus on this, guys?
Thats the same like saying hitler (hi im /pol/) was a bad leader because he lost the war in stalingrad. totally ignore the 8yr economic growth and everybody else playing factors in the game.
>>3380167
yes but napoléon was a great man
not an american (shit by default LOL)