How does /his/ feel about the Axis History Forums? Good place

>>3379492
>Forums

File: d157b28f014c7b8749637a465dff397b.jpg (25KB, 400x310px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 400x310px

>>3379492
last time i was there it was a holocaust denial thread so i doubt it

>>3379496

>Gram Nazi

Haha nice one! :)

>>3379504
You sure? They're pretty tight on holocaust denial stuff

The average post there is probably longer, more detailed, and more well sourced than the average post here, but due to their autism they have a tendency to go on tangents completely unrelated to the topic over the smallest disagreement.

>>3379492
It's good, there's usually someone around who knows his stuff much better than almost anyone on /his/. Bit slow, unfortunately.
>>3379504
It's not a stormtard forum, though. Stormtards generally get btfo or kicked out there, but I'm sure one slips through occasionally.

Axis was was bad at war whole nations failed against one main force of a nation you could say two but..

its ok, some good sources there
learning about ww2 military history, you read military history books

not popular dumbed down books which flows the market with anglodumbs who never set foot in a russian or german archive

military history is dry and focuses on single operations, you put the picture togather, authors usually give very little narrative, they do try to find reason and connections but youll never read it in such book which army was better, which machine gun was the best or what was an "elite" unit, thats not a concern military historians, what they are interested in is facts which are not that easy to find given how much misinformation can be even in a detailed military report

good example
https://www.amazon.com/Waffen-SS-Armour-Normandy-Panzerj%C3%A4ger-Abteilung/dp/1907677240