http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet ech/article-3985150/Is-w

>>3373855
lead tablets are pretty neato, I have heard of them being used as books, but can't find much on the internet. The author of a book I read claimed to have seen lead tablets written by Jacob or some other old testament character. It wasn't an /x/-tier book, but some historian just hanging out with Mandaeans, It is a shame he didn't obtain permission to scan them

I am hoping that this will shed more light on the ever-paradoxical life and history on the historical Jesus.

It also makes you wonder who wrote the books, if they were a misconception of Christ or more accurate than the Gospels...

>claim god was both male and female
Our Xather, who art in heaven

>>3374013
It makes me wonder about the rumours of the various apocryphal books allegedly held in the Vatican archives. Too many books like this would crumble the entire institution, or at least discredit them heavily, if they were to become widely known.

>>3374229
The Wikipedia article doesn't seem to be too friendly to these codices

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jordan_Lead_Codices

>>3374240
Well that's damning.

>>3374240
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLhhpR-jp9o

watch this.

It was copied from dumb journalist copying some skeptics book.

>>3374291
The own wikipedia article says that the lead is 2k years old.

is legit.

(((they))) don't want you to see the truth.

wikipedia is heavily infiltrated.

>>3374240
>the lead is of a perfectly appropriate age to have been made within one or two lifetimes of Christ
>the writing hasn't been proven to be the same age
How would the forger get their hands on lead that was that old and why would they risk damaging it by stamping print into it?