Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
File: Tf4PGFI.png (256KB, 720x480px) Image search:
[Google]
256KB, 720x480px
>search for discussion about intellectual imposters and the Solal hoax
>find multiple defenses of the the philosophers Sokal talked about and criticism of Sokal as "not understanding the philosophers"
Jesus Christ, why bother arguing with these critical theory leftists if they don't even admit that the Intellectual Imposters philosophers talked shit? What do you guys think?
https://www.reddit.com/r/badphilosophy/comments/5me6cg/hey_guys_do_you_remember_when_alan_sokal/
>>
Can't say that I know anything about Alan Sokal.
>>
There are no arguments that actually change the people you debate with. The only way to change their mind is to torture them.
>>
http://www.mrbauld.com/chomsky1.html
OP here, just found this by Chomsky. He lays it all out the way I see it, only be humours them by pretending to be naive.
>>
File: images (22).jpg (6KB, 251x201px) Image search:
[Google]
6KB, 251x201px
The sad part is that not even hard sciences are immune to this. Pic related.
>>
File: 1504394319154.jpg (796KB, 1320x1650px) Image search:
[Google]
796KB, 1320x1650px
>that's nice, dear
What the fuck is this shit
>>
>>3365726
That's because you're a dummy: Sokal's discovery" was appliable to literally every academic field (including hard sciences like Phyics and Chemistry), yet somehow it always turn out to be about postmodernism, rather than knowing that publishing shitty articles on non-peer reviewed journals is the easiest thing in the world.
>>
>>3365726
go back
Thread posts: 8
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3