Why do people cite non-Bantu civilizations when defending Sub-Saharan

>>3362310
Why did Finland never accomplish anything?

Why do people shit on sub-saharan Africa when they're actually just criticizing Bantu civilizations?

Because they're from Africa.

>>3362310
Bantu are basically frontier people who lived in the Rainforest and Miombo. Why expect them to be anything other than what they were?

Most Black Americans and African Diaspora in the Americas don't come from them.

>sub-saharan africa
>civilization
>before colonialism

>>3362310
Finland had the largest empire in history

>>3362359
That's Korea though.

>>3362328
Does it matter? They just want to shit on Blacks and will use anything to do so such as deliberately misunderstanding shit and making up bullshit rhetoric.

>>3362320
Something something squirrel skins and shiet

They actually had the zimbabwe civilization. Irrelevant and small but they developed it in complete isolation, unlike europeans, who basically cucked themselves into middle eastern and north african civilization.

>>3362491
It was actually pretty important in the area and it was a part of a line of big political entities in the region.

>>3362310
>beginning with the premise that Bantu civilizations are the default for Sub-Saharan Africa when Bantus were back-migratory invaders who displaced indigenous SSA tribes

Read a book motherfucker.

>>3362491
Europeans created a lot of independent civilizations, even more impressive than Zimbabwe

But yes Zimbabwe is pretty impressive

>>3362320
lmao people from siberia didn't accomplish anything fuckin subhumans lol

this is literally your argument reworded

>>3362310
Subsaharan races are a subspecies and could never created a truly human civilization.

>>3362684
Zimbabwe, Shongai, Yoruba, Swahili, Zimbabwe

>>3362686
All meme civilizations, and some among them had heavy Arab influence. The negro never invented a writing script, tell wheel, or a dwelling more than 2 stories.

>>3362708
>never invented a writing script

Just like Europeans

>>3362708
And europeans civilizations have heavy mesopotamian influences. They never invented writing, the wheel, or a building greater than 2 stories. They stole it all from the mesopotamian warrior

>>3362718
> or a building greater than 2 stories

Not him but Cucuteni, Minoans, Nuragics, Myceneans

Though I think his point is retarded and the Axumite empire built castles

>>3362451
not according to latest archaeological discoveries made by the CassinI probe

>>3362458
This. We wuz shakespeare n invention n sheeitt

>>3362718
>And europeans civilizations have heavy mesopotamian influences.
And have surpassed Mesopotamia a million times over

>>3362320
Uh, they did? Just look at the Romans.

>>3362749
And subsaharans have generally surpassed europeans now too, since they're population isn't declining compared to the average Europeans. I too can use completely arbitrary subjective means to determine how advanced a civilization is

>>3362714
All indigenous european groups had their own alphabets, please stop with his mesopotamia meme already

>>3362766
>All indigenous european groups had their own alphabets

Their own alphabets were derived from Phoenician

>>3362765
Rats outbreed humans too, it doesn't make them human. Look at how subsaharans live without outside civilizing influence. They live in utter chaos. Examine their skulls and faces and even physically they are off model. They would be extinct like other subspecies if compassionate Europeans hadn't kept them afloat this long.

>>3362766
>all indigenous europeans have their own alphabets
retard/10
>>>/historybook/

>>3362765
>And subsaharans have generally surpassed europeans now too, since they're population isn't declining compared to the average Europeans
Imagine being this stupid. All means are "subjective," but I still put EInstein above a cannibal. An immediate jump to extreme skepticism is always a sign that you've lost the argument.

>>3362765
>>3362822
also, why the hysterics? we can admit that african civilizations are presently inferior without doing wrong. In fact, it would be wrong not to admit what is true.

European civilizations were once pretty primitive, but I'm sure you've never defended them for the reason that they were always shitting out babies. Try to have some personal culture my dude

>>3362841
>why the hysterics I just wanna ignore facts and reinforce my preconceived notions
>>>/pol/

>>3362623
>Invaders, displaced.

Boy they just migrated and assimilated a lot of them.

>>3362766
>please stop telling me facts I don't like already

File: IMG_1517.png (64KB, 316x947px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 316x947px

>>3362320
>he doesn't know about the Finno-Korean hyper war
Literally?

File: 49621-great-zimbabwe-stone-ruins.jpg (148KB, 549x600px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 549x600px

>>3362639
>But yes Zimbabwe is pretty impressive
lmao how low can your standards get?

>>3362899
Can you name a fact I've ignored? Or don't you maintain that everything is subjective, including the worth of facts?

>>3363543
That's the Great Zimbabwe structure not the kingdom