Thread replies: 7
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
Why do people still believe in Jungian psychological and non-empirical psychiatry?
Carl Jung just proposed that the stereotypes of story characters from his day were always present as the fundamental underlining of all psychology, and that fallacy laced stereotyping was a science.
Biased and oblivious to basic epistemology.
Psychiatry not founded upon testing and weeding out biases and fallacies appears to be making a comeback; based on casteism, role suction, circular reporting, etc.
Why do people make up bullshit instead of simply sticking to empiricism, testing, deduction, reason and logic?
>>
Because you hate your father and want to fuck your mom. That will be 300 shackles
>>
>>3354677
Seriously, how can I not hate everyone else?
Most people reject empiricism and instead promote egotism, stereotyping and groupthinkers.
I have a violent hatred for most people.
They're ruining everything.
>>
>>3354665
>t. INTJ
>>
Why is Jung constantly singled out as ridiculous while people constantly entertain Freud? How is it any worse? Why is Freud constantly name-dropped everywhere you go but people lose their shit when somebody talks about Jung?
>>
>>3354729
Tell me more about your father.
>>
File: 1449598415530.jpg (1016KB, 831x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
1016KB, 831x1000px
non-empirical psychiatry- based on the narrative experience, and techniques that strengthen your willpower
empirical psychiatry-load up the shotgun with as many different pills as possible and see which one sticks.
-this pill has no apperent application- i wonder what will happen if I give it to a bipolar patient?
its becuase psychology applied is to be for the betterment of the human being, it isn't to make themselves a zombie for their oppressors.
Thread posts: 7
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2