Stalinism and the USSR reunited all the territories of ancient

>>3344928
What the fuck are talking about, Russian Empire had all the territories of USSR

>>3344981
Western belarus and galicia were Polish, crimea and southern malorossiya were Turk, and Zakarpathian Rus was Austrian.

File: Map_of_Russia.gif (36KB, 619x437px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 619x437px

>>3344991
I got some news for you

>>3345027
Galicia and Zakarpathian Rus are Austrian in this map.

>>3345058
that really doesn't make a big difference

File: rusen.jpg (80KB, 604x453px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 604x453px

>>3344928
Russia is the successor of Golden Horde, not Kiev Rus.

>At first Uzbeg did not want to empower Moscow. In 1327, the Baskaki Shevkal, cousin of Uzbeg, arrived in Tver from the Horde, with a large retinue. They took up residence at Aleksander's palace. Rumors spread that Shevkal wanted to occupy the throne for himself and introduce Islam to the city. When, on 15 August 1327, the Mongols tried to take a horse from a deacon named Dyudko, he cried for help and a mob of furious people fell on the Tatars and killed them all. Shevkal and his remaining guards were burnt alive. Thus Uzbeg Khan began backing Moscow as the leading Russian state. Ivan I Kalita was granted the title of grand prince and given the right to collect taxes from other Russian potentates. The Khan also sent Ivan at the head of an army of 50,000 soldiers to punish Tver

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Horde

>>3345132
It's seems the embarrassment from the last time this was posted wasn't enough

>>3345142
No amount of shitposting will change the fact that Russia has nothing to do with Kiev Rus. Eastern Slavs weren't as mongoloid as they are right now.

>>3344928
[stands in breadline]

truely the niggers of Europe

>>3345154
>same culture
>same religion
>same people
>same ruling dynasty
TRY HARDER
R
Y

H
A
R
D
E
R

>>3345163
>same culture
Not at all.
>same religion
Yes
>same people
No. Like I said. More mongoloid.
>same ruling dynasty
No.

File: Ruriks.jpg (261KB, 789x1261px) Image search: [Google]

261KB, 789x1261px

>>3345168
You faggot don't even trying

>>3345132
>Look guys! I cherrypicked some image from a gopnik comedy facebook page! This proves how mongoloid Russians are compared to us aryans!

kys

Meanwhile ukraine has the most amount of turk and tatar admixture. Funnily enough, even the national ukrainian hairstyle is turkish.

>>3345182
>some bastard offspring is the same line as original Rurik
>>3345185
Doesn't change the fact that Ruskies are mongoloid. More so than Slavs from Kiev Rus.

Not to mention that Moscow destroyed the true succesor of Kiev Rus - Novgorod.

>>3345161
[western propaganda]

Fuck off neoliberal. If I wanted to find niggers of europe I'd go to London.

>>3345072
It does. Those were principalities of Kievan Rus filled with Rus people that the Russian empire never liberated.

>>3345189
The American Journal of Human Genetics 82, 236–250, January 2008

"The extensive analysis of the Russian pool of paternal
lineages presented here establishes the following general
features: (1) insignificance of the oriental gene flow, highlighted
by the lack of typical East and Central Asian
haplogroups;..."

>Not to mention that Moscow destroyed the true succesor of Kiev Rus - Novgorod.

All Russian principalities were successors of Kievan Rus.

File: Busby_2015_admixture.png (685KB, 1024x742px) Image search: [Google]

685KB, 1024x742px

>>3345222
>The American Journal of Human Genetics 82, 236–250, January 2008
>"The extensive analysis of the Russian pool of paternal
>lineages presented here establishes the following general
>features: (1) insignificance of the oriental gene flow, highlighted
>by the lack of typical East and Central Asian
>haplogroups;..."
lol

File: gajda by gubert.png (682KB, 960x888px) Image search: [Google]

682KB, 960x888px

>>3344928
>Czech

>>3345238
This pic was supposed to mean something, probably... yeah

File: 552449298.jpg (33KB, 600x340px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 600x340px

>>3345475
it does if you're not a brainlet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26387712
http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1481340/

tldr: russians are mongoloid

>>3345256
>What is Transcarpathian Ruthenia?

File: 14fzEpS.jpg (47KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 625x626px

>>3345513

File: busby.png (962KB, 731x872px) Image search: [Google]

962KB, 731x872px

>>3345544
read the study before you sperg out. the guy was not wrong, east slavs are more mongoloid now than they were during kiev rus.
>Over the past few years, studies of DNA isolated from human fossils and archaeological remains have generated considerable novel insight into the history of our species. Several landmark papers have described the genomes of ancient humans across West Eurasia, demonstrating the presence of large-scale, dynamic population movements over the last 10,000 years, such that ancestry across present-day populations is likely to be a mixture of several ancient groups [1-7]. While these efforts are bringing the details of West Eurasian prehistory into increasing focus, studies aimed at understanding the processes behind the generation of the current West Eurasian genetic landscape have been limited by the number of populations sampled or have been either too regional or global in their outlook [8-11]. Here, using recently described haplotype-based techniques [11], we present the results of a systematic survey of recent admixture history across Western Eurasia and show that admixture is a universal property across almost all groups. Admixture in all regions except North Western Europe involved the influx of genetic material from outside of West Eurasia, which we date to specific time periods. Within Northern, Western, and Central Europe, admixture tended to occur between local groups during the period 300 to 1200 CE. Comparisons of the genetic profiles of West Eurasians before and after admixture show that population movements within the last 1,500 years are likely to have maintained differentiation among groups. Our analysis provides a timeline of the gene flow events that have generated the contemporary genetic landscape of West Eurasia.

>slavic catholics
Constantinople deserved it

>>3345577
Slavic Catholics = Civilization
Slavic Orthodox = Barbarism, primitivism

orthodogsy is islam-tier

>>3345629
>muh relijun is better than yours
Literally Islam tier.

>>3345629
Slavic catholics= sucking german cock, shitty individualism, jew influence, mercantilism, endless massacres
Slavic orthodoxy= Independent civilisation, humanism, spiritualism, collectivism, tolerance and mutual respect

>>3345709
lmao, but it's literally serbs and russians committing genocides, being imperialistic, savage shitholes

>>3345190
Piss off commie I'm from a former eastern block country and USSR was anti-Slavic, anti-Russian and anti-human impoverished prison of nations and we're all glad it's dead.

>>3345709
>Slavic orthodoxy= Independent civilisation, humanism, spiritualism, collectivism, tolerance and mutual respect

All of that bullshit should be replaced with one thing that would be true: Russian imperialists and their bitches

File: rosja chuj.jpg (2MB, 2285x3500px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2285x3500px

>>3345709
>Independent civilisation
Russians are pretty much Chinese pawns who LARP as a world power. Their economy is wack, their population is shrinking, their culture is degenerate by alchohol, poverty and corrupt orthodox priests with watches worth more than a yearly income of an average ruski.
>Humanism
More like blind faith and lack of ambitions.
>collectivism
>tolerance
Pick one.
>mutual respect
Hahahaha lol no.

>>3345529
If anything they would be speaking Slovak

>>3345716
Its catholics who commit genocides and do capitalist imperialiasm. See Pilsudski's oligarchy, Ante Pavelic, Hungarian dicatorships, Bandera etc.

>>3345876
>Pilsudski's oligarchy

He was a protestant who was changing his faith with each new wife and killed some of his political enemies but never commited any genocide.

I don't know what to say about the rest. All people can commit atrocities but still nothing compared to communism.

>>3345876
What Hungarian dictatorships? Horthy was a Calvinist.

>>3344928wtf i love stalin now

>>3345185
He's not wrong. The reason Muscovy rose above all the other principalities under Mongol control was because they were THE most willing to carry out Mongol orders, collect and pay Mongol taxes and punish unruly principalities that had crossed the Mongols. I mean FFS Alexander Nevsky the """Russian""" """"national hero"""" visited the Mongol court in Sarai on the Caspian Sea multiple times in his life. You can't make this shit up.

>>3346081
like there's something wrong with that

>>3344928
If this true why did the soviets consistently place locals over Russians in disputes and give them autonomy?

>>3346081
Except Alexander Nevsky was Novgorodian, not a Muscovite.

>>3346829
Only a Mongoloid would think there isn't.

>>3346845
>Except Alexander Nevsky was Novgorodian, not a Muscovite.
God, what a dumbass

Oh look, it's another poltard who imagines mongol yoke as russians actually living together with mongols and interbreeding

>>3346845
>Only a Mongoloid would think there isn't.
Here's a little mind game for you. As a small duchy what your course of action, place following in correct order.
-unite the shattered state
-attack big empire to gain independence
Choose wisely