If we ever got to the point where we could create robots with

>>3321531

Slavery is only bad because of the emotional and physical pain that it inflicts on the victim. Machines cannot feel emotional or physical pain, so there is nothing wrong with "enslaving" a machine.

Wait, are we starting with the assumption that slavery is immoral?

>>3321540
>Machines cannot feel emotional or physical pain
the machines we are capable of producing currently certainly cannot, but that doesn't mean that we won't be able to in the future

>>3321551

Never heard of the "golden rule" faggot?

Do you like being called a faggot?

File: 1502324411659.jpg (19KB, 750x402px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 750x402px

>>3321540
>Slavery becomes moral so long as you lobotomize them first and use anesthesia.

>>3321556
>Design a robot to do x
>Program it to feel bad when doing x

Yep makes perfect sense

>>3321623
Right. It's more likely that they would in fact be designed get off on doing menial repetitive tasks, probably with some basic incentive/reward system that doesn't actually cost anything but gives them a sense of achievement.

It's like they would have a job playing shitty f2p mobile games. You won't actually need to enslave them, they will gladly do what is asked of them to get more gold stars or whatever. It's just a framing problem.

>>3321654

Just program them so that doing repetitive menial tasks makes them happy. Make so that they got a healthy dose of digital endorphins any time they complete the task at hand.

What the point of creating sentient machine for doing repetitive tasks?
Simple mechanism already can do it.