Why was the Mexican Reconquista so successful? Do Gringos fear

File: somos_aztlan_.jpg (136KB, 610x430px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 610x430px

The natives are simply reclaiming stolen land.

>>3299513
Because aparently having laws is racist.

>>3299547
The only law of history that is universal is the law of conquest, gringo. You took the Far North of Mexico by force and turned its inhabitants into second class citizens. The racial motivations behind the war are plain for all to see. But now, the Mexicans are only reclaiming their natural lebensraum from the weak eurangutans, and now you cry your crocodile tears about enforcing arbitrary laws to save your delicate race of pink rats.

>>3299547
You're at the tip of a poverty stricken continent. You and canada are essentially the only two not crappily led and successful nations on the whole two continents.

Feel free to make your laws, implant your rfid chips and shut your borders to legal migrants but you'd have better luck legislating the tides.

And the tides are coming anon.

>>3299513
The U.S. brought this on themselves by funding cartels and drug wars in Mexico

This is karma and justice

File: memorial-of-the-berlin.jpg (68KB, 550x413px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 550x413px

>>3299513
I think this is an apt comparison. While Americans love to harp on about destroying communism and the symbolism of oppression that the Berlin Wall represented, they have STRENGTHENED their own "Berlin wall" along the Mexican border. Really makes you think....

>>3299513
What the fuck is "American" in this graph? Mutts?

>>3299616
mostly people of anglo descent actually. there are definitely mutts among this population though

>>3299613
>A wall to keep people in is the same as a wall to keep people out

>>3299616
Americans.

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-27 at 6.14.03 PM.png (125KB, 597x431px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 597x431px

>>3299613

>>3299625
You mean united statians.

>>3299624
You're keeping them inside of mexico. Helk you have people in your government literally flabergasted and outraged at how Mexico won't pay for a wall to keep its people in it.

>>3299571
At the time of the US Mexican war the part of Mexico that eventually became part of America had around 40,000 Mexicans living total in all that area.

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-27 at 6.15.19 PM.png (226KB, 483x751px) Image search: [Google]

226KB, 483x751px

>>3299631
Ironically the Italian Mafia was chaotic neutral. When the Feds destroyed them in the 80s, the Mexican cartels stepped in and conquered the US by turning its citizens into degenerate drug addicts. It was the ultimate jiujitsu; they turned american individualism against itself masterfully.

>>3299634

You think the emigration of Mexicans to the US is actually good for Mexico? You're pretty dumb then

>>3299645
Yes it is. Why are you lying?

>>3299650

Ok I guess you are dumb.

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-27 at 6.19.28 PM.png (227KB, 481x750px) Image search: [Google]

227KB, 481x750px

>>3299640

>>3299624
true, but if you think about it it's also the opposite as well. the US government is becoming a national security state obsessed with monitoring its citizens. It is Stasi but with gorillion times the resources. Why, for example, do we need a passport to get into canada nowadays? Why is it so much harder to enter Canada and Mexico? Why are our civil liberties being curbed?

>>3299639
It was still larger than the gringo population. Given time (see OP) the Mexicans would have settled it.

File: including-unreported1.jpg (4MB, 7129x3833px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 7129x3833px

use the newer data

>>3299645
To some extent it is. The illegal immigrants from Mexico overwhelmingly cone from poor, less educated, less sjilled backgrounds. While Mexico has rather meager welfare support, these people would still be a cause for political and social tension. By going to the US Mexico rids itself if this burden plus gets a source of foriegn cash from the remittance payments. These payments, perhaps still now, but certainly at one time recently were the single largest source of foriegn cash even larger than Mexico's Oil industry.

Because Mexico sucks and the United States is a better place to live.

>>3299640
>>3299631
the mafia was never destroyed. especially in Europe where they are like the # 1 drug smugglers into the West.

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-27 at 6.26.40 PM.png (140KB, 414x703px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 414x703px

>>3299662


>>3299645
>what are remittances
>what is sending excess population away to ease social and economic problems

>>3299662
>the Mexicans would have settled it.
I don't think hat is true Mexico didnt have the population to settle Texas a couple decades ago which is why they asked for outside settlers to come. Texas was much better land than the remaining portion of Northern Mexico. Most Mexicans wanted to live closer to Central and southern Mexico, which again was far richer land than even Texas was.

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-27 at 6.30.34 PM.png (149KB, 432x721px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 432x721px

>>3299683

>>3299691
>to settle Texas a couple decades ago which is why they asked for outside settlers to come.
Its a fair point, but it ignores the devastating impact of apache raids in the many decades before anglo settlement in texas. nomadic raids had depopulated the area severely as the inhabitants got btfo by horse warriors.

>>3299656
>>3299645
Remittances are literally Mexico's 2nd largest source of income.

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-27 at 6.35.30 PM.png (242KB, 476x721px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 476x721px

>>3299692

>>3299678
Basically this

>>3299599
And this

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-27 at 6.36.34 PM.png (186KB, 457x701px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 457x701px

>>3299711

>>3299543
They aren't natives they are bastards.

>>3299599
We'll see.

>>3299513
according to this most of the US is of German descent, also most of Trump supporters

>>3299599
Time to build the wall.

>>3299613
Our wall is to keep people and Invaders out. Not to keep them in.

>>3299571
The spics lost the war they started and didn't you that land. Get over it.

We're building the wall.

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-27 at 6.40.02 PM.png (196KB, 457x722px) Image search: [Google]

196KB, 457x722px

>>3299727

>>3299745
>they started
lol
>didn't you that land.
can you speak your own language hillbilly?
>We're building the wall.
good luck jajajajaja. your political elites are so divided that it will never happen. you americans are becoming more like a third world nation with each passing day. i predict civil war in your country in 20 years, at most. I can't wait till our government reannexes our lands that have majority mexican population now.

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-27 at 6.42.21 PM.png (40KB, 480x179px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 480x179px

>>3299746

>>3299700
Well the Apache raids were certainly a problem for Mexican settlers in Texas and the rest of Northern Mexico. But I am not certain if the Mexican army alone could have defeated the Apache without the American army also fighting the Apache. Mexico was a newer nation than the US, that was in more political flux, had a weaker military, and thus had to be more on guard from Eurpean colonial powers trying to assert control over Mexico. I don't think Mexico could have afforded to have sufficient troops in its periphery in the North to deal with the Apache on their own. This would have been a continuimg problem for Mexican settlement of its North. Given the sensibilities of that age I suspect the US would have still wound up with the land though it may have been at a better price than the one negotiated at the treaty of Hildalgo.