Why didn't Amerindians set aside their differences

Don't worry my nigga, we're going to unite with all non wh*Tes from Blacks to Asians and genocide wh*Te subhumans

>>3292842
Eurangatans were literally armed apes shooting up an unarmed university campus.

>BTFO Europeans
Couldn't happen. They would've won eventually; they were far too advanced in comparison.

>>3292846
Good luck with that

>>3292842
Because plagues had already wiped out like 80% of the native population, they just never had a chance.

File: swig.jpg (60KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 500x500px

>>3292842
Because they were heathens.

>>3292858
Superior weapons can't defeat numbers + dedication.

See: Mongols, USSR, Vietnam, Afghanistan

>>3292905
they didn't have the numbers, they're tribes were on the brink of collapse before colonists arrived

File: 18252158_437238156637806_1780606764186599424_n.jpg (170KB, 1080x1350px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 1080x1350px

>>3292912
They still outnumbered the colonists. Only later on would they become minorities.

>nates
>ever doing anything productive

>>3292905
>minorities
>dedication/disipline/focus

Pick one

Euros had technology, and also organization. Tribes are too small and conflicted to unite. Civs play rival tribes against each other.

>>3292905
Vietnam had superior weaponry.

Because they hated each other more than the hated the Europeans, to put it in simple terms.

>>3292842
Same reasons why modern Europeans are still squabbling with each other instead of fighting back against the Muslims. They don't understand the demographic threats.

>>3292905
>See: Mongols, USSR, Vietnam, Afghanistan
None of these groups were particularly if at all backwards compared to their enemies.

>>3292846
>Collaborating with middle-east pigs for becoming just like white peoples.
No thanks.

>>3292905
You're an idiot

>>3292842
>90% population death
>no modern communication between villages and cities
>no information about the new people
It's pretty obvious.

>>3292973
Incas were pretty much organized though. The diseases was the main and mostly the only factor for the failure.

>>3292842
They were not really a single people that could be banded together.

Europe was millennia ahead of America and they only managed to set aside their differences (but not really) like a decade ago.

>>3292842
Because they were inferior biologically and technologically.

>>3295108
/thread

>>3295108
Incas were superior to europeans though.

>>3295133
They couldn't ride a horse and use muskeets, so they were inferior.

File: ollanta.png (176KB, 312x600px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 312x600px

>>3295141
>horses
>muskeets
Wrong. All irrelevant against the andean civilizations. Yet Incas managed to make iron some years after the spanish came and got horses from them.

Incas were superior to europeans. History demonstrates it. Get over it, monkey.

>>3295234
extremely low quality bait

>>3295234
Woow.. they won 100000 against 30 spaniards and 30000 monkeys... sooo brave of them.

>>3295284
So you agree with Inca superiority?

Great for you, chimp.

>>3294280
Pizarro quite literally intervened in the middle of an Incan civil war.

>>3295328
The Inca civil war happened due to the death of the Inca(king) without completing his plans and leaving a prepared sucesor, due to european diseases.

>>3292846
Can I join as a slav?

Ignoring that disease reduced their numbers to an amount that couldn't adequately resist, they hated each other.

>>3292872
This. There simply weren't enough of them. Pre-plague population, they could have.

>>3292842
>why didn't medieval Europeans forget their differences and BTFO the Muslims?

File: maize_pill.png (2MB, 1000x5500px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1000x5500px

>>3292842
>implying that weren't their plan all this time

>>3292842
If aliens had arrived to conquer Earth in 1950, would the West have allied with the Commies to defeat them?