Thread replies: 5
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: 747324201000100980616no[1].jpg (756KB, 980x616px) Image search:
[Google]
![747324201000100980616no[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/7blCizW.jpg "747324201000100980616no[1]")
756KB, 980x616px
>The core idea of the responsibility to protect (often abbreviated as 'R2P' or 'RtoP'), as endorsed by the United Nations General Assembly at the 2005 World Summit, is that every state has the responsibility to protect its population from genocide and other mass atrocity crimes; the international community has a responsibility to assist the state if it is unable to protect its population on its own; and that if the state fails to protect its citizens from mass atrocities and peaceful measures have failed, the international community has the responsibility to intervene with appropriate measures, with coercive military intervention, approved by the UN Security Council, available as a last resort.
Do you agree?
>>
I think they should only pass resolutions they intend to enforce.
>>
>>3292151
So does this make Mugabe a criminal for not prosecuting murders of whites?
>>
>>3292151
States may do what they want with their own inhabitants.
But States may also do what they want with other states. So if a nation wants to commit genocide, and other nations don't want it to, it must be able to defend itself from those other nations.
If it can't, it really has no right to do anything.
>>
>>3292204
It shouldn't even be in there, but alas we must put it in there because human empires/countries throughout history have shown they do not care about their own people. Instead they will often use force on their own citizen to rule over them.
Thread posts: 5
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1