Thread replies: 4
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
File: 1501527804534.jpg (217KB, 960x925px) Image search:
[Google]
217KB, 960x925px
I'll make up a concept right now called concept-1. Imagine I asked you what concept-1's true meaning was. Imagine I asked you what concept-1 said I should do when herding goats in Rwanda and I have a cold. And similarly for a hundred other situations. Imagine I claimed that the investigation to find the true definition of concept-1 would require many more years. You'd think I was stupid. Maybe you'd point out that I just invented the term, so I should just define concept-1. You'd say that the "solutions" to the scenarios would have to be arbitrarily defined.
Now imagine the same thing but instead of concept-1 we look at "morality". Why is the investigation taken any more seriously?
>>
File: 1502383619077.jpg (104KB, 592x814px) Image search:
[Google]
104KB, 592x814px
>>3280940
How's middle school going?
>>
>>3280940
>Hurr durr dismissive question in response to an actual question
Off yourself
Anyway op, morality is only standardized by factions because the good lord hasnt returned yet. Finding an arbitrary definition is an exercise in futility, because no single person's values correlate the same way to their morals as another. I hope thats a good answer to your question.
>>
>>3280940
This thread, and by extension you as the creator of it, depress me
Thread posts: 4
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2