How much validity is there to the claim that Germany's debt before WW2 was the cause of, or at least a significant factor, in their decision to go to war and acquire new territory?
>>3275656
If debt is the core problem, going to war isn't the solution.
>>3275656
It wasn't so much debt as it was lack of foreign reserves. Germany was heavily dependent on imports, especially for food, iron, and other non-ferrous metals. They were running out of foreign currency to pay for them, and needed the stuff to function. Conquering people and forcing them into an economic union with Germany " solved" the problem.
>>3275722
didn't Germany export a lot of weaponry to fund imports?
>>3275764
Not nearly enough to maintain solvency. By 1936 onward, almost all of it is going to re-arming the Wehrmacht.
The plan was to go to war from the beginning. The fact that the debt would be rendered insolvent was just part of that plan. The whole thing was a ponzi scheme that could only ever have ended in war from the first MEFO bill issued. Hitler wanted his total war. Debt was just a jewish number. Why care?
>>3276177
That was before the Great Depression and before Germany was ruled by the Nazis. Immediately after the Depression Hoover placed a memorandum on all debt payments leading to the Lausanne Conference where the Allied powers agreed to stop pressing germany for reparations as it went through a major financial crisis. The Nazis refused to pay a dime.