Why is it that every other "bad guys" in history are

>>3255942

They are...

File: Untitled.png (2MB, 1464x968px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1464x968px

>>3255942
>these guys get a free pass?
They do?

The term "Hun" was literally brought back to use because of German barbarism in 20th century.

File: 1497708580087.jpg (129KB, 670x894px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 670x894px

Because its impossible to shine the light of barbarism and sub-humanism on a group that was literally eradicating the barbarians and sub humans in an attempt to preserve one of the most modern and European cultures of the time. Its like saying the British and French empires were savage in their imperialistic campaigns that brought the civilization we know today to the people that are openly called savage and uncivilized by comparison.

>>3255973
Akshually it's because the Kaiser told them to "fight like Huns" during the Boxer Rebellion, only in WW1 did it become an insult

>>3255983
It's easy to proclaim yourself civilized and all around you barbarians and subhumans. But it doesn't make you any less barbarous if you do gruelling and savage things yourself.

>>3255983
Seems like you got lost.
>>>/pol/

>>3255983
Incas were superior to europeans though.

>>3255942
Its just really convenient to demonize them in this period of time we're in.