Why has sub-saharan Africa never developed and culture or civilization of great value?
Don't worry, they will become first-world any day now. We're really helping them.
>>3253836
What are you talking about they were kings of egypt
>>3253947
Also what is this off?
>>3253947
I always found this guy's criticisms ironic. Didn't Chinese mismanagement kill some 30,000,000 of their own citizens after the end of European influence? Didn't they try to eradicate all their sparrows, destroy a bunch of their own heritage and other pants-on-head retarded, truly egregious shit?
The Chinese are literally the last people who can criticize post-colonial legacies.
>>3253969
It's from a documentary called Empire of Dust. It's about Chinese construction work in Africa.
>>3253976
You're kind of right, to be honest.
>>3253849
Will /pol/tards ever recover?
>>3253976
>Didn't Chinese mismanagement kill some 30,000,000 of their own citizens after the end of European influence? Didn't they try to eradicate all their sparrows, destroy a bunch of their own heritage and other pants-on-head retarded, truly egregious shit?
>End of European influence.
Except China wasn't colonized to begin with- just a few bits of cities in Coast was all Europe ever controlled there- with and the entire 19th Century was hell for them. By the 1950s they were pretty much at rock bottom. The entirety of Chinkdom never had the benefit of a bunch of European masters building shit for them during the painful crawl to modernization. Everything they built in Chinkdom, they learned how to build themselves.
Not to mention when the European Colonial holdings in China fell to their laps, they preserved them instead of forcing them to be PRC on the get go.
Meanwhile many ex-colonies enjoyed Western development and Infrastructure which all went to shit after they left.
>>3254023
Still, they killed 30,000,000 of their own people and destroyed a bunch of their own heritage.
If we combined every African war, famine, etc. after 1960 and corrected for population, I doubt we'd get anywhere close to that number.
>>3253976
China has heaps of heritage and you can't really kill it unless they are in low numbers and killed off like many indigenous folk.
>>3253849
niice
>>3254065
And how does that make the Chinese the last people to criticize post-colonial legacies?
>Be Chinese
>Not colonized by the Europeans.
>Go through hellish 19th/Early 20th Century due to both foreign intrusion and your own inability to stabilize the country & general mismanagement by a series of shit governments.
>Learn from all that and build up
>"Wow we had tremendous fuckups, but we're better off now because we learned from them."
>Be Chinese.
>See all these third worlders to whom the Europeans built fucking everything for them fro close to 150-200 years.
>Africans in 1900-50s lived better than an average Chink peasant.
>It all goes to shit after Euronigs leave.
>"Wow guys, you literally had everything going for you and you fucked it up, why?"
That's basically what Lao was about.
>>3254023
>Meanwhile many ex-colonies enjoyed Western development and Infrastructure which all went to shit after they left.
Not really. The infrastructure was paltry barring like a couple if places because conical government had no need or gave any fucked about fufilling the needs if the populace.
public education for blacks was only a thing in Africa post independence. Vast majority was private and had to be paid out of pocket which really made educating the masses a gargantuan task considering how poor funding was for mission schools.
>>3254094
>Africans in 1900-50s lived better than an average Chink peasant.
Lol no you tard, Not even close.
>>3254111
Ikr? All that peace, they clearly have it worse than a Chinese peasant dodging bullets while starving since 1916 with not a single clue about who among the many cunts is his legit government.
>
>>3254138
China has sher numbers.
>>3254131
And you know Africa had other fucked up bullshit as well? Not even saying rural China had it better.
>>3253849
/thread
>>3253976
"""Communism""" strikes again.