Can you point out some flaws in his theory? Specifically, in

I am of the opinion that Peterson's thought from what I know of it is that which I take to be Jungian in character,
and makes a great deal of presuppositions about metaphysics and dabbles too much in the anthropomorphism.
Bluntly, I do not think that mythology and religion as informing of meaning and value are adequate epistemological categories or at least are arrived at hastily and further, I do not think that we can say that they factor greatly into ordinary experience.

I also think that logos in this sense is a less developed version of the Hegelian notion of Spirit, and this outlines what I take to be a major issue with Peterson,
which is that he has an implicit dualism of phenomenal and noumenal types of knowledge.
That is, the distinction between only observable and only intelligible forms of knowledge, without a theory regarding interaction between the two.

If people are interested in what Peterson is saying, I think they would be better served by examining the German Idealists, or maybe even Alasdair MacIntyre if they think there is something to what Peterson says about morality.

File: 20170816_003446.jpg (404KB, 2896x2896px) Image search: [Google]

404KB, 2896x2896px

Here's a flaw