I'm not /pol/ but, philosophically speaking, why aren't

you are /pol/

Compatmentalization.
Dont know the readoning or how it happend.
But some jobs women are good at doing and some jobs men are good at doing.
Since this has been the underlying assumption since hunter gatherer times, they have seen little to no use in cross training people.
Could be a tribalistic-it doesnt matter what you want its whats good for the tribe. You're a man and you do x. Takes alot less energy in filling roles and training then letting your members decide what they would like to do instead.

Women carry babies in their bellies men cant. This is the primary basis.

>&humanities speaking, why is [bait]?

I've noticed a trend lately.

>>3215474
>Did men being viewed as greater than women begin simply because men were physically stronger?
Yes.

Is it really so shocking that social inequality is linked to the sexes literally not being equal?

File: 1501997854857.jpg (370KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

370KB, 640x640px

>why are these two fundamentally different things not perfectly alike in abilities and behavior
hurreerreee

>>3215474
The only thing that is exclusive to gender is that women menstruate and can become pregnant and men can knock up women. The rest is social constructs or hormonal influences that don't actually limit anyone.

hormonal influences don't limit anyone because I bastardized the definition of the word limit to suit my thinking

Anonymous ## Mod 2017-08-09 11:34:53 Post No.3217829
[Report]

Anonymous ## Mod 2017-08-09 11:34:53 Post No.3217829 [Report]

This thread was moved to >>>/pol/136693321