Assuming, for the sake of discussion, that the Gospels are accurate

>>3202770

I don´t give a flying fuck about him.

>inb4 some people start to claim he was a wise man and a teacher

If you don't believe he had a chance of being God, he was batshit fucking insane in the Gospels, telling people to eat his flesh and to give up their property for some non-existent kingdom.

>>3202770
It all seems a bit culty

File: IMG_0957.jpg (17KB, 200x175px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 200x175px

>>3202770
Makes it easier for me

Inferior to Shakyamuni Buddha

He's just a cult leader, quite a typical one for his historical context, we know about several Messiah from around his time. He's interesting because while being the most influential cult leader in history, he's quite a loser personally, having amassed a following of several dozens only and being executed only a few years after he'd started his mission.

>>3202770
The first zombie in literature.

I would think

that

he was a kike.

Oh wait I dont have to assume anything in order for that to be true.

>>3202789
>>3202800
Honestly this
>First, if he claims to be God and yet in fact is not, he has to be a madman or a lunatic.

>Second, if he is neither God nor a lunatic, he has to be a liar, deceiving others by his lie.

>Third, if he is neither of these, he must be God.

>CS Lewis

Of course, this assumes the gospels are entirely accurate, which is far from supported.

File: 29-how-jesus-became-god.jpg (33KB, 400x600px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 400x600px

>>3202845
I find it hard to believe he actually called himself God because if he did the other gospels would have had a lot to say about it. But instead, it's only the latest, the less reliable and the most contradictory gospel that mentions this crucial fact. He most likely called himself Messiah and The Son of Man tho, but these positions have no claims of divinity.